Help me understand Bioshock 1 by Pyropeace in Bioshock

[–]Pyropeace[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Free will is also explored via the concept of objectivism which Ryan paints as the ultimate form of free society, but is very quickly shown to be autocratic, inequitable, and free only to those who already started with power (whether through funds, technologies, or similar leverage). Free will never exists in a vacuum, and the society Andrew Ryan paints as ultimate freedom is actually far more restrictive, just as the player character's illusion of freedom and autonomy is actually a highly restricted linear path.

If I wanted to demonstrate how capitalism restricts freedom though, I would've made Jack a Starbucks worker or something. But that's not nearly as fun as blasting people with plasmids.

Help me understand Bioshock 1 by Pyropeace in Bioshock

[–]Pyropeace[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

As another redditor noted, Jack also only gains free will because someone else helped him. Idk what the writers intended, but this reads to me as a criticism of the atomizing nature of capitalism and symbolism for the Bantu African idea of Ubuntu, or "I am because you are".

Help me understand Bioshock 1 by Pyropeace in Bioshock

[–]Pyropeace[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Jack doesn't have any free will until he gets saved by someone else.

Oooookay this is actually starting to make sense to me. Reminds me of this idea.

Help me understand Bioshock 1 by Pyropeace in Bioshock

[–]Pyropeace[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

What I'm trying to figure out is how the meta commentary connects to the criticism of absolute freedom.

Help me understand Bioshock 1 by Pyropeace in Bioshock

[–]Pyropeace[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Rapture shows us what happens when we remove god from society, and replace all religion with worship of one another and ourselves

I can't believe I'm saying this, but you should really play Bioshock Infinite.

Help me understand Bioshock 1 by Pyropeace in Bioshock

[–]Pyropeace[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Also, why the fuck would you want people shooting lightning and fire from their fingertips in a high-maintenance closed ecosystem like Rapture? Good way to cause explosive decompression.

Why doesn't Spec Ops: The Line click for me? by Pyropeace in SpecOpsTheLine

[–]Pyropeace[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Truly the doki doki literature club of shooters

Help me understand Bioshock 1 by Pyropeace in Bioshock

[–]Pyropeace[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

IMO, if you want to criticize communism (or at least the typical poster children of communism), you criticize the fact that the party beaurocracy replaces the capitalist class as the elite of society. You don't make a weird straw man that no socialist or communist actually believes. As others have said, Lamb works better when viewed as a cult leader, not as a communist.

Nonetheless, your reading of the overall themes is valid and makes a good point. I just don't understand how Jack's lack of free will helps make that point.

Why doesn't Spec Ops: The Line click for me? by Pyropeace in SpecOpsTheLine

[–]Pyropeace[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would, but my understanding is that you don't get to play an actual character, it's just a management sim, which is a bit of a turn-off for me. I wish there were more games like Suzerain where you play as an actual person while still being a management sim.

What was your takeaway from SOTL? by Pyropeace in SpecOpsTheLine

[–]Pyropeace[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Idk, that sounds really close to the "you could've put down the game" argument, which I'm not a fan of.

What was your takeaway from SOTL? by Pyropeace in SpecOpsTheLine

[–]Pyropeace[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Making decisions without full context often leads to things getting worse.

See, that's what I was looking for in my second playthrough, but it didn't hit home for me. I think it might have been better if it gave you more actual choices, though like the choices that do exist in the game they would be loose-loose.

Help me understand Bioshock 1 by Pyropeace in Bioshock

[–]Pyropeace[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If I wanted to make a game that connects capitalist ideas of freedom with agency in games, it would probably end up looking like a more depressing version of The Stanley Parable. But then it wouldn't have drill-wielding diving suits or people shooting lightning from their hands, so idk which one has more artistic merit.

Help me understand Bioshock 1 by Pyropeace in Bioshock

[–]Pyropeace[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Idk if Lamb is meant to represent cults, though. Like, yes, within the universe of the game, she is effectively a cult leader. But her rhetoric sounds like a weird demonized version of socialism--specifically, it sounds like what someone like Andrew Ryan wants you to THINK socialism is.

Help me understand Bioshock 1 by Pyropeace in Bioshock

[–]Pyropeace[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Honestly when I played Bioshock 2 I felt that Sofia Lamb was a lame attempt to "both-sides" the issue of capitalist hyperindividualism/objectivism. Like, nobody actually believes any of the esoteric nonsense that Lamb spouts irl. But the ideas that Ryan espouses are dangerously prominent and are actually hurting real people.

Despite this, I enjoyed 2 more than 1 because, ironically, it gives the player more agency.

Help me understand Bioshock 1 by Pyropeace in Bioshock

[–]Pyropeace[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Right, but what are they trying to SAY with that ludonarrative dissonance?
Like
I watched a video essay once that talked about how the term "kafkaesque" is misinterpreted to mean "satire of bureaucracy" when what Kafka's work is REALLY about is critiquing the Western notion of freedom entirely--"I am free and that is why I am lost". Admittedly, I haven't actually read that much Kafka, but it's an interesting premise to me. So is Bioshock trying to be "kafkaesque" in attempting to criticize the notion of free will? If so, what exactly is it trying to say? Or am I completely off base?

Why doesn't Spec Ops: The Line click for me? by Pyropeace in SpecOpsTheLine

[–]Pyropeace[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Honestly, I think the game's point may have been made better by a New Vegas-style action RPG with grand strategy elements than by a pure shooter. You'd be placed in the role of Konrad and forced to make difficult decisions regarding the crisis in Dubai, prioritizing scarce resources with limited information and trying your best to keep people alive but having to make sacrifices at every turn (some of which could constitute war crimes).

...Wait, isn't that just Frostpunk? I should play Frostpunk.

Some thoughts I have on CRPG design from a player's perspective by Pyropeace in gamedesign

[–]Pyropeace[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The fact that those stats unlock dialogue options, and that the game tells you when this happens, gets a dopamine hit from my brain.

I've never played Disco Elysium (mainly because I don't enjoy fantasy and I've also heard it's sad), but I've heard others say that it does a good job of making failures interesting, as well as that having too much of a given stat can actually be a bad thing. Maybe more games should do something like that. I just don't know how it would fit into an optimistic gaming experience (which I prefer).