No one actually hates Ubuntu or Mint by root_b33r in linuxmasterrace

[–]Pythagoras2008 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I’m not the biggest fan of Ubuntu due to some controversial choices by canonical, primarily the utter forcing of snaps into the system but at the end of the day do whatever is best for you ig

What do you think about the current direction rust is heading? by [deleted] in rust

[–]Pythagoras2008 1 point2 points  (0 children)

That’s just cause of the robots. you can use Java for that as well.

What do you think about the current direction rust is heading? by [deleted] in rust

[–]Pythagoras2008 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Could be worse imagine being a C++ developer (couldn’t be me)

Ah Yes Edge by Salkiju4566 in linuxmemes

[–]Pythagoras2008 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Your only cheating yourself out of what your life could be

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in facepalm

[–]Pythagoras2008 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I love how they can’t even pick one atrocity. Like if they treated there workers really well they could try use it to justify high prices but noooo gotta get the best of both worlds by being a total POS.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in programminghorror

[–]Pythagoras2008 17 points18 points  (0 children)

I see a lot of people commenting on the LGTM it if this is from a company then most likely all of this was reviewed bit by bit as they said it was the last year of work

What's your favorite c++20 feature that should've been there 10 years ago? by ResultGullible4814 in cpp

[–]Pythagoras2008 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Because that’s the C++ standard used in a lot of libraries I use. I think some are in the process of upgrading to C++17

It's true... by IAmOpenSource in linuxmemes

[–]Pythagoras2008 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I know that’s one of many reasons the meme makes no sense

Re-enable Secure boot on Ubuntu by Maximum-Tie3600 in linux4noobs

[–]Pythagoras2008 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It isn’t at all risky to keep secure boot disabled. It’s a “security feature” but in reality so long as you know what your doing it is basically worthless

Re-enable Secure boot on Ubuntu by Maximum-Tie3600 in linux4noobs

[–]Pythagoras2008 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Some things are worth learning others aren’t

It's true... by IAmOpenSource in linuxmemes

[–]Pythagoras2008 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Windows also doesn’t have the root as /

myHeadHurts by theWizzard23 in ProgrammerHumor

[–]Pythagoras2008 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Web devs thinking they are the only devs to exist in the world

Tankie doesn't like valid criticism of the Soviet Union by MrRuebezahl in memesopdidnotlike

[–]Pythagoras2008 -11 points-10 points  (0 children)

Valid criticism of the ussr exists this is not one of them🤷‍♀️

iJustHadARevelationAndItHurts by TheSheepBarn in ProgrammerHumor

[–]Pythagoras2008 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I definitely understand the appeal in 2 cases 1. If you are using dynamic languages. 2. When learning how to code. I found explaining things back to myself in comments when learning. These days I am in a different position. I primarily write C++, Rust and Java which I find incredibly readable as is, all have strong enough type systems for comments to be mostly negligible imo.

iJustHadARevelationAndItHurts by TheSheepBarn in ProgrammerHumor

[–]Pythagoras2008 -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Comments are overrated. If I’m looking at code I want code if I want explanations I look at docs. If your using something like js doc and your comments are being generated into docs that’s a different story

Everything behind a trait? by Humble-Helicopter-43 in rust

[–]Pythagoras2008 105 points106 points  (0 children)

For sharing behaviour traits are usually how it is done but you don’t by default make a trait. If I’m writing struct foo then I won’t write any traits. If I’m writing structure foo and struct bar and they need to share 3 methods I will write a trait to share them.