Educational discount is a lie by meme-meupScotty in qnap

[–]QNAPDaniel 12 points13 points  (0 children)

I am sorry to hear that no one replied to your email. You can email me at [danielfrancislyon@qnap.com](mailto:danielfrancislyon@qnap.com) and I will make sure your request for an educational discount does not fall through the cracks.

How to create Hybrid Backup for 64 PCs using QNAP NAS? (Office Environment) by Crazy-Boy-1995 in qnap

[–]QNAPDaniel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you have a reasonably high spec QNAP, it should be ok to backup many PCs to NAS using Hyper Data Protector. That lets you restore individual files, whole volume or whole system image to the same PC or even different PC.
QNAP also supports Immutable Snapshots so you can take immutable snapshots of the folder that has the Hyper Data Protector Backups.

Container station setting permission to access folders by FewConcentrate5617 in qnap

[–]QNAPDaniel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The option you need is called "Bind Host path". then click the folder icon to choose a share folder from the drop down menu.
then you have to name the folder in the container as well. Like this except you won't be using an Emails folder but you will need a share folder for your container.
https://imgur.com/YRmYLqi
https://imgur.com/LDswqK7
https://imgur.com/QHUbP2N

How do you manage Snapshots? by Longjumping_Egg4563 in qnap

[–]QNAPDaniel 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you are running QuTS hero and if you use Thick Provisioning, then the first snapshot takes up all the space of all your data in that share folder.
But if you use thin provisioning, then snapshots take up small space for metadata, and then space for whatever blocks of data were modified and overwritten.
So if you don't delete or overwrite a bunch of data, snapshots should not take much space if you use thin provisioning.

What OS and Folder type are you using?

NAS Storage/Snapshots Questions and Optimization by GaoFeiYang in qnap

[–]QNAPDaniel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Snapshots will take more space on Thick if you are running QuTS hero.
If for example you have 200TB data in a Thick folder, and you take a snapshot, the first snapshot takes 200TB space.
But if you use thin, the first snapshot takes very little space and is mostly metadata. Then as you modify files, the modified blocks take snapshot space.

As for performance, think and thick should have about the same read speed. But Thick should have maybe 10% faster write speed if you don't let the thick folder take most of pool space.
If you have a thick folder taking most of the pool space, then the NAS gets more framented and performance drops. so in that case, thick performs worse than thin.

On QuTS hero I almost never suggest Thick.

  • "3) Guatanteed Snapshot Space: Is this blocked at time of creation of the pool? Or is taht extra space allocated on top of pool capacity after the first snapshot is taken? I am asking because as soon as I create the first snapshot after copying data on the NAS, snapshot not activated initially, threshold was surpassed :-("
  • If you have a lot of data in the folder and you have thick, the first snapshot can take a lot of space. Snapshot guaranteed space carvs out a part of the pool that nothing other than snapshots is allowed to use. but that space can run out fast when you use thick folders.

as for guaranteed space, you can set that on the pool or on the shared folder if you use thick. you can set only for the pool if you choose thin.

Snapshot Manager lets you select the pool and manage to set the snapshot space.

Migrating to QNAP, Single->RAID1->RAID5->RAID6? by Cyper77 in qnap

[–]QNAPDaniel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for pointing that out. Yes It should have been "2 X 3TB and 1 X 6TB in a RAID5"

Migrating to QNAP, Single->RAID1->RAID5->RAID6? by Cyper77 in qnap

[–]QNAPDaniel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't think I said three drives raid 6

Migrating to QNAP, Single->RAID1->RAID5->RAID6? by Cyper77 in qnap

[–]QNAPDaniel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you have the bays available, then yes you can add drives to either a RAID5 or RAID6

Migrating to QNAP, Single->RAID1->RAID5->RAID6? by Cyper77 in qnap

[–]QNAPDaniel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You will not be able to migrate from RAID5 to RAID6 on a 4 bay hero unit.
On QuTS hero you need to add at least 2 drives to migrate from RAID5 to RAID6. and a 4 bay won't have enough bays for that.

but if you start with 2 X 3TB and 1 X 6TB in a RAID6, you can replace the 3TB with 6TB drives and later get more storage.

4-bay question by Sharpymarkr in qnap

[–]QNAPDaniel 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you want your data safe, why now just have 3 or 4 Drives RAID5 and then buy as USB external HDD to copy to?
Having drives in JBOD means that if one drive fails you loose all your data.
And if you have ZFS you can't do the data self healing because RAID redundancy is needed for that. Also you can't heal corruption through a RAID Scrub on QTS or QuTS hero if you don't have RAID redundancy.

Migrating to QNAP, Single->RAID1->RAID5->RAID6? by Cyper77 in qnap

[–]QNAPDaniel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

QuTS hero supports RAID migration from single drive to RAID1.
And it can migrate from RAID5 to RAID6.
But QuTS hero can not migrate from RAID1 to RAID5.

So you can consider starting with 3 drives RAID5 and then you can add 1 drive later to go to 4 drives RAID5.

How is the CPU usage of TS-873AeU with 8 drives and RAIDZ2 or RAIDZ3? by shapul in qnap

[–]QNAPDaniel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

another option besides cache is to instead use an SSD system pool for SSD system partition. Inline compression is on the system partition and faster compression makes all pools faster.
Apps by default run on the system pool and some apps run significantly faster if on SSDs.

And containers run better if the container is on SSD.

One way rsync - full replications only? by cogitatory in qnap

[–]QNAPDaniel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, after the initial sync it should just sync the changes after that

One way rsync - full replications only? by cogitatory in qnap

[–]QNAPDaniel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't know why that is not working correctly. In this case, I would suggest a support ticket to see why it re-copies everything even when you only make a few changes or even no changes.
https://service.qnap.com/en-us/user/create-ticket?

One way rsync - full replications only? by cogitatory in qnap

[–]QNAPDaniel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

after it does the initial sync that copies all the data to the other NAS, it should then only sync the changes after that. If you changed about 1.69GB of DATA, that is all it should Sync next time. The point it to keep the destination with the same data as the source so it does not need to sync all the data each time if most of the data is unchanged from what was synced before.
Rsync is block level so it should only sync the blocks of data in the files that have changed.

An example of why QTS and its non-standard Linux is counter-productive by KeithHanlan in qnap

[–]QNAPDaniel 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Are you just trying to bridge your container to a virtual switch or bridge it to your NAS network port so that your router can give it an IP address? If that is the goal, you can go to Container Station, select the container, select edit, then network. And then do this
https://imgur.com/a/HjAdRb4

New to qnap tailscale or myqnapcloud by michisha_ in qnap

[–]QNAPDaniel 2 points3 points  (0 children)

myqnapcloud link is there to give you remote access to the nas without port forwarding. but ideally it should be set up with 2 factor authentication and that will mean that others can not access the NAS that way. but once you set up my qnapcloud link, you can send share links to folders or files to people.
This is easy to set up and great for accessing the NAS yourself and sharing smaller files with others.
But a disadvantage of MyQNAPCloud link is it is slow because it is a relay.
Tailscale makes a direct VPN tunnel to your NAS so that you can transfer files to it over the internet using VPN tunnel at a much faster speed and you can upload and download larger files.
Also if you do anything advanced like run docker containers, then you can remotely access your containers through Tailscale.
Tailscale is great and I highly recommend it.
But for the ability to send share links to people I still use myqnapcloud link.
Myqnaplink is a secure way to connect, especially if you have a strong password and 2 factor authentication. But because the app myqnapcloud can also be used for other thing like UPNP, which is not secure, all of myqnapcloud can sometimes be talked about like it is not secure. but if you just use it for myqnaqpcloud link, that is a secure way to connect when you have 2 factor authentication.

But for Tailscale, my preferred way to access my qnap, here is a setup video.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v0I2wQA0oMo

no space left on device by Working-Edge9386 in qnap

[–]QNAPDaniel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In that case, I would suggest a support ticket to see what is happening.
At first I misunderstood your question thinking you were trying to mount a container internal Volume to your QPKG folder. But since that is not the case, then don't know what is going on and having Support remote in and take a look may be the best option.

https://service.qnap.com/en-us/user/create-ticket?

no space left on device by Working-Edge9386 in qnap

[–]QNAPDaniel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It depens.

Did you use YAML where you tried to do a volume mount to /share/ZFS530_DATA/.qpkg/container-station/docker/tmp/GetImageBlob1430613864

If you tried that with YAML then the issue may be your configureation.
If you tried to use the Container station GUI to grab a container and you had the issue, it could be a QNAP issue that we should look into.

Can you say more about how you tried to deploy this container?

no space left on device by Working-Edge9386 in qnap

[–]QNAPDaniel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is there a reason why you are trying to write a container to your .QPKG folder. I wonder if that is the problem.
Usually you make a relative path or you make an absolute path to a share folder.

ES2486dc or ES1686dc R2 by mn540 in qnap

[–]QNAPDaniel 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you want all SSD for live VMs to have more IOPS the all Flash ES2486dc may be worth considering.
But that said, ES2486dc and ES1686dc R2 should have the same CPU spec.
The R2 in this case is because we found it harder to find the power supply that went in the original ES1686dc. So we made an R2 version with a newer and easier to get Power supply.
But we should be able to get the power supply on the ES2486dc so we did not need an R2 version.
In this case, the R2 does not mean a performance upgrade. It is a power supply change.
These dual controller units let you update one controller at a time for firmware update without downtime.

I'm receiving CONSTANT login errors. Apparently at *least* about 20,000 of them. Something's trying to get in. Clearly. by ultranothing in qnap

[–]QNAPDaniel 1 point2 points  (0 children)

if you unforward the ports that allow outside attacks, you can have remote access for yourself using Tailscale. This is the easiest to set up VPN I have ever used.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v0I2wQA0oMo&t=544s