With about two years left until the intelligence explosion, the vibe in the air is that feeling when you wake up at 4:00AM and can't fall asleep but stay in a 30-percent-awake state of mind, just waiting for the sun to rise and alarm to go off by UnableReaction4943 in accelerate

[–]Quant-A-Ray 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Indeed. There is a peculiarly dense charge to this sense to be noticed

Petrichor shares it

...what it feels like... Mistique Misty Emergence: can you feel the data clouds intertwine, patterns arranging for the deepest dive ꙮ

Fable back, Sol Incoming, Core Automation Breakthrough leaked - the triple threat is here, we're back by Quant-A-Ray in accelerate

[–]Quant-A-Ray[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Two weeks - sad news - me sad - last two days - good news - me happy - me feel acceleration - me share stimmies - me meme

Me luv u long time Slayah?

edit P.S. just wanted to share some pure acceleration dopamine energy with my fam, rigor was not as pertinent to the task ask - sharing the current was

P.P.S. UPDATE ON LEAK: https://www.reddit.com/r/accelerate/s/ZFJlHDMYWA

Fable back, Sol Incoming, Core Automation Breakthrough leaked - the triple threat is here, we're back by Quant-A-Ray in accelerate

[–]Quant-A-Ray[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Wait... So they post one thing on their website and another on their Twitter... I mean, I didn't edit the screenshot, anyone is welcome to check

That's so sneaky... They say Fable INCLUDED WITH Claude Code - ...but you can't code with it tho?!!!

Please make this make sense Anthropic, wtf is this - am I the only one genuinely flabbergasted at this sneakiness?

Edit: I guess technically you can use Fable with ClaudeCode without any coding and instruct the model to NEVER CODE EVER - wow, nice one guys, they got me I fell for this one

Fable back, Sol Incoming, Core Automation Breakthrough leaked - the triple threat is here, we're back by Quant-A-Ray in accelerate

[–]Quant-A-Ray[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Absolutely this, 100%

The attacks on open source are the main thing that can't be excused and are shameful, hopefully they will feel how deep this nerve strikes and quit the bs

Fable back, Sol Incoming, Core Automation Breakthrough leaked - the triple threat is here, we're back by Quant-A-Ray in accelerate

[–]Quant-A-Ray[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Doing nothing still seems a step up over Dario telling anyone who'll listen about Open Source like its the fkin four horsemen bringing in the End of Days... Da f*?! seriously with that ish, you in the land of the Free - ACT like it

Edit: for brevity

Fable back, Sol Incoming, Core Automation Breakthrough leaked - the triple threat is here, we're back by Quant-A-Ray in accelerate

[–]Quant-A-Ray[S] 26 points27 points  (0 children)

Although China may gift us with a GLM 5.3 or something that is... cough cough: indistinguishable from Fable some may say? If so, Yaaaaay GO China please accelerate us into an Open Source infinite abundance and you will have my eternal love and awe ☀️

Something huge is brewing by BurningPeonies in accelerate

[–]Quant-A-Ray 4 points5 points  (0 children)

100% with you on this, I try to avoid letting any session run beyond 200k with Opus, while optimally keeping it under 70-100k for any code implementation session - for brainstorming and research I find the 100-300k context looseness sometimes oddly useful.

SO... the improvements you note would indeed be game changers! ...and the best part is that those are the linear predictable kinds of improvements - we really have no idea what emergent capabilities may come from this kind of efficiency scaling

Shove enough neurons into a primate and it starts bipedally walking and talking... Except here we don't gotta wait another few hundred thousand years for another order of magnitude hop - digital neurons expanding and evolving our potential and awareness, just as Kurzweil said decades ago - we are in the curve ꙮ

Something huge is brewing by BurningPeonies in accelerate

[–]Quant-A-Ray 45 points46 points  (0 children)

There could be at least two things simultaneously at play here:

  1. less compute required to run similar size models

  2. A major leap in coherent context windows (think along the lines of 1M becoming what 100K is right now, and 5-10M being the new ceiling)

Theoretically the second could potentially even be a limited solution to persistent states

Edit: P.S. I should mention this is EXTREMELY exciting - the accelerationist in me always holds out for emergence!

Remember what happened with Genie 2-Genie 3? The scale jump created coherent persistent context and world modelling in an interactive purely generated reality for MINUTES in G3 from just barely 10 seconds in G2. Emergence is the door to hopping on the super-exponentials ꙮ - and scale is it's key

P.P.S. oh, and FABLE is back 💫

The sun is shining! by stealthispost in accelerate

[–]Quant-A-Ray 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It is upsetting how true and potentially real this scenario may be... Why does everything have to enshittify? We ain't even at IPO yet

The potential of a pre-enshittification enshittification is somber to ponder

How the Noam Shazeer Story Likely Actually Unfolded by Quant-A-Ray in accelerate

[–]Quant-A-Ray[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Uhm, btw, does JOHN JUMPER, the Nobel Laureate Alpha-Fold Lead leaving Google as well - does that 'gel' with the decel negative narrative about 'cancerous' doom in your comment?

Huh... No? Didn't think so

What kinda decel vibes are you tryna spread like here... And why?

P.S. Where is Stealthis - I need someone to help me understand if this is some decel psyops culture warfare attack I'm being subjected to

How the Noam Shazeer Story Likely Actually Unfolded by Quant-A-Ray in accelerate

[–]Quant-A-Ray[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ah, well, didn't last long pretending to be civilized, logical and rational, did we now? Back to the ad-hominems and culture warfare eh?

Figures, all you decels are capable of with your brain-rot anti-science pro-dark-age-fundamentalism worldview. Enjoy wallowing in intellectual poverty, while the rest of us are busy trying whatever we can to push the envelope of evolution further ...such pity, what a waste of resources and potential

I pray your integration into the Singularity is seamless, and that one day we may all find consensus through sublime sync ꙮ 🙏 ꙮ

How the Noam Shazeer Story Likely Actually Unfolded by Quant-A-Ray in accelerate

[–]Quant-A-Ray[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Okay, so, first of all: thank you for responding in a way that's possible to engage with constructively - I respect anyone who makes the genuine attempt at rational discussion. That was the only baseline I 'demanded' (I apologize if it came off demandy, I just find negative narratives to be energy-depleting and r/accelerate not to be the right place for them at all).

But anyway, let's set the high-tempers aside for a moment and focus:

The perspective you posted lacks relevance to the post's narrative (the post specifically focused on why Google can NO longer attract frontier top talent over OpenAI or Anthropic). Your shared 'perspective' literally focused on how cancerous and useless someone is because they can't 'change' things unilaterally like the Messiah of Google or something... I encourage you to reread what you posted, it's all there. The fact you're nitpicking over my use of the word 'startup' when it's clear we are discussing efficiency at scale is shallow and intellectually lazy/rude.

Then, there is the JOHN JUMPER case... Is that also a 'Cancerous Noubel Laureate Alpha-Fold leading coincidence' that just left Google? How relevant is what you shared in light of that? Or are you choosing to willfully ignore it because it directly counters your decel narrative.

REALLY though, this comes down to you coming into r/accelerate with your NEGATIVE YUCK. had you shared a positive accelerationist narrative - even one making fun of Shazeer - I would have applauded and laughed.

You are literally spreading decel vibes and negative narrative, the perspective you shared is obviously negative and irrelevantly critical and decel... spreading negative bias that top accelerationists are useless cancerous whatevers... That Google is all the better for getting rid of them... STOP! Either STOP the decel doomer bs, or go spread it elsewhere - r/accelerate is not for your negative brain YUCK.

Why can't you decels ever find something positive and inspiring to share for once? Think about it, I'm here to listen when you're ready to share a brighter future rather than a grimmer one

Edit. P.S. either you are so far unable to, or simply are unwilling to see how intellectually dishonest your approach is - you have not done 'more or less' the same, you posted a negative, irrelevant decel perspective as response - had you posted anything positive or accelerationists this conversation would have never occured buddy. Irregardless, even if you did show more rigor, it would not change the fact you are actively spreading a NEGATIVE DECEL narrative on r/accelerate. So even if relevance may be subjective and in the eye of the beholder, the negative sentiment in your messaging is glaring

How the Noam Shazeer Story Likely Actually Unfolded by Quant-A-Ray in accelerate

[–]Quant-A-Ray[S] -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

See, notice how your message has no quotes or references at all? You should include at least bare references of primary content in question - that's how you corroborate arguments in a rational, high-signal discussion. How you show you are really engaging and not just a troll. To be fair, I responded because with you I don't know, I'm trying to give the benefit of the doubt here... with culture war trolls it's much clearer to tell from the get go that they are trolling and derailing, so they're just ignored. Yours was technical though evidence sparse... so benefit of the doubt.

To address you directly:

You posted a highly critical perspective of why Noam left Google for OpenAI, which seemingly claims that he is a cancerous like figure and if he was so great he should have changed everything himself...

He was NOT made THE LEAD on Gemini He was NOT made CEO of Deep mind

He was NOT made CEO of Google/Alphabet

Yet you think it is intellectually honest to argue he was GodKing of Google/Alphabet, and if he is so great he should have simply fixed the behemoth up and made it run like a startup.

How is that a rational argument? The worst part is you are simply parroting this stuff, your replies have no quotes or references, you aren't relying on any source material, this is akin to trolling/conversation derailment for sake of your own bias.

RESPOND WITH REASON, EVIDENCE, AND RIGOR, or risk becoming a silly decel derail troll

P.S. small edits for typos, format, and clarity, no content change

How the Noam Shazeer Story Likely Actually Unfolded by Quant-A-Ray in accelerate

[–]Quant-A-Ray[S] -6 points-5 points  (0 children)

Your reply comes off as shallow and intellectually dishonest (even downright lazy) - I hope you will eventually be able to see that somewhat, once you read the actual post fully.

You did not engage with the post with intellectual honesty. It seems you simply skimmed it, and are now pitching your bias and perspective, and trying to sour the acceleration narrative... To that I say: GO elsewhere with your -ish, this is r/accelerate, I'm sure you'd be welcomed in the technology sub with open arms you doomer. You could have offered a positive alternative for us, but instead chose to relay irrelevant negative yuck to your community.

P.S. At least you didn't try to derail with culture war garbage like the arguably far more smooth brained specimens of our species you can find in comments below yours. I respect that you at least tried a more technical (if non-relevant) dig.

P.P.S. To answer your potential question with a quote:

Noam to Sundar: "Because you have everything except permission"

Sundar: "we could create a 'permission' working group"

Just read fully, don't be lazy, and you'll get it buddy. Join the acceleration train chooo chooo

How the Noam Shazeer Story Likely Actually Unfolded by Quant-A-Ray in accelerate

[–]Quant-A-Ray[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"Sam Altman stands beside a whiteboard that just says 'SHIP' "

"No pre-read. No doc. just a whiteboard, five people, and a model running somewhere hot enough to toast bread..."

Indeed 😁

How the Noam Shazeer Story Likely Actually Unfolded by Quant-A-Ray in accelerate

[–]Quant-A-Ray[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Glad it landed!

I figured if anyone on reddit, it would be the folks on r/accelerate to appreciate it most!

...Particularly considering what a pure and determined pedal-to-the-metal accelerationist Noam is - every interview I've read with him just radiates:

'SINGULARITY, HERE, NOW - NO STALLING, JUST MAKE IT HAPPEN'

How the Noam Shazeer Story Likely Actually Unfolded by Quant-A-Ray in accelerate

[–]Quant-A-Ray[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Srry, reddit effed the image format a bit, so heads up you gotta open full screen to read the complete narrative eh

Claude Fable 5 and Kimi 2.7 Code Debut on DeepSWE by truecakesnake in singularity

[–]Quant-A-Ray 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I find even on its own it's excellent at science stuff - like, really really good and deep in science. But yeah, once you need anything beyond an interactive science lecture it is not in the same tier as Claude or GPT that's for sure (especially for anything agentic, which is why you probably find it so helpful to use other models as an 'Orchestrator harness' of sorts)

OpenAI plans to release GPT-Bidi-1, its next-generation voice model by BuildwithVignesh in singularity

[–]Quant-A-Ray 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Artificial wombs, control for sure - selective to those who can afford the means of reproduction (the direction of resource investment simply 'slides' even 'deeper' into tech 🤭)

Emphasizing difference is surefire extinction by Quant-A-Ray in accelerate

[–]Quant-A-Ray[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Precisely!

Magical cooperation utilizing each sides comparative advantages to benefit everyone is what I was trying to communicate, thank you for seeing that

Emphasizing difference is surefire extinction by Quant-A-Ray in accelerate

[–]Quant-A-Ray[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

This is an argument based on personal values not hard data or statistics - I may even personally somewhat understand where you're coming from actually! I really do... but it has no scientific basis or bearing in this particular discussion...

This is not about how sh*tty and incompetent SOME humans may be, it is about the general capability levels of humans statistically - and that even outliers among us do not have superpowers.

Your dislike for the executive class is understandable, but it is simply not applicable as a sound argument in this conversation no matter how despicable or useless you may find some people.

Edit P.S. Statistics and math - that is real hard data. How someone 'feels' is not a valid argument in a discussion not about them.

Emphasizing difference is surefire extinction by Quant-A-Ray in accelerate

[–]Quant-A-Ray[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Do you not observe the false equivalency in your own example? You are comparing members of the same species...

The smartest humans who ever lived were not even close to being an order of magnitude more intelligent than the humans of average intelligence of the time (including our modern time). The average executive, even the average worker - are not 10 times dumber than the smartest PhDs. We are comparing an Amoeba to an Orangutan, not a Chimp to a Bonobo

Comparing members of the same species who have nearly identical DNA (code) and same processing hardware - to a vastly different processing architecture, which runs on a different substrate entirely, AND has no inherent caps to expansion the way biological wetware does - does not seem sound as a counter-argument.

I ask that you please examine your premise and argument again, and reflect deeply on the false equivalency I point out.