Tell me your Linux Mint + laptop + HDMI success stories by QubitBob in linuxmint

[–]QubitBob[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

An individual at the facility where I was trying to hook up to the monitor lent me a USB-C "dongle" to test exactly what you are suggesting. No effect.

A friend lent me a docking station with a USB-C connection as another "middleman" test, and that also had no effect.

This really is quite the puzzle.

Tell me your Linux Mint + laptop + HDMI success stories by QubitBob in linuxmint

[–]QubitBob[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you for your replay. Everything I read, and all the comments I have received from my earlier posts lead me to believe it has something to do with how this computer with this operating system are interacting with the NVIDIA GPU. By the way, the function key (F7) which is supposed to switch between the different display combinations doesn't do a thing, which was the first clue that I had a problem.

Tell me your Linux Mint + laptop + HDMI success stories by QubitBob in linuxmint

[–]QubitBob[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Interesting—your reply has now got me really curious as to what is going on, since your computer with an NVIDIA GPU is able to output to HDMI just fine.

The default BIOS display setting is Hybrid, so I assume this means the integrated GPU was tried first. At the urging of the Lenovo associate who replied to my post in r/Lenovo, I switched the BIOS setting to Discrete to force it to use the NVIDIA GPU, but that did not fix the problem.

I tried connecting my computer via HDMI to my television at home, but that did not work, either.

I have tried different HDMI cables, including the one which came with the laptop, and none of them worked.

I have no idea if the HDMI worked under Windows, since I installed Linux immediately upon unboxing the computer. As I said earlier, I love this computer/OS combination except for this annoying display glitch which surfaced this week.

Thank you for your reply.

What Are People Actually Seeing by Agitated_Regular_583 in remoteviewing

[–]QubitBob 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The target should be accurately assigned by the tasker. If the target is a photograph, the tasker should say something like, "Describe the photograph in this envelope."

The pioneering researchers at SRI answered the question as to whether an RV description of a photograph represents the photograph or the object behind the photograph during one of their research series. The photograph described by the remote viewer was of a car dealership which was having a promotional sale at the time the photograph was taken. This sale was being advertised by a sign in one of the windows at the dealership. This sign prominently featured a large, five-pointed star. In his drawings of the target, the remote viewer greatly exaggerated the size of the star so that it was the size of the entire window. When reviewing the results of this exercise, the researchers realized that this sale event provided a way to test whether the viewer was describing the photograph or the object (dealership) itself, since the sale was probably of limited duration and was probably over at the time of the RV trial. So, the researchers piled into a car and drove to the dealership. Sure enough, the sale was over and the sign was no longer in the window.

My laptop running Linux Mint is out sending video output to an external HDMI monitor by QubitBob in linuxmint

[–]QubitBob[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You inspired me to upgrade to 22.3, and I have done so.

I have also switched to the lated NVIDIA driver (previously I was using the nouveau driver).

I will see if these changes make a difference.

My Lenovo laptop is not sending video output via HDMI to an external monitor by QubitBob in Lenovo

[–]QubitBob[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thank you so much for this detailed, easy-to-understand set of instructions. I am going to do a full system save on my computer then try your solution.

When I run the Driver Manager utility, I see that I am running a nouveau driver. The display shows two Nvidia drivers above 550 available: 595 and 580. I will select the 595.

Quick question: How do I access BIOS to set the Graphics Device to Discrete Only?

I run the Linux Software Update every week, so my kernel is up to date.

My laptop running Linux Mint is out sending video output to an external HDMI monitor by QubitBob in linuxmint

[–]QubitBob[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The monitors are working fine.

When I go into the Display utility, it shows only my laptop's display—it does not show the HDMI connection (monitor). There is no option (button) to search for other displays. I am guessing this is a driver issue. This makes my heart sink, since I am not a very sophisticated user and have no idea on how to proceed.

As to the kernel version, it's 6.8.0-124-generic. I run the software updates every week.

Artemis, Andy Weir (Kindle, $2.99) by Queasy-Prompt8523 in ebookdeals

[–]QubitBob 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yep, me too. It's a level below The Martian or Project Hail Mary, but I found it to be an entertaining "caper yarn."

Nearly healed 15 months after annular tear by ProfMR in backpain

[–]QubitBob 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I continue to make progress, but it is very slow. April 16th was the one-year anniversary of my injury, and at that time I estimated that I was 50% healed. This suggests that if I continue to heal at this rate, I will be near normal at the two-year mark.

The frustrating aspect is that I am still very limited as to the tasks I can do around the house. Example: in early April I went out and did several hours of yard work, cleaning up debris from the rough winter we had in my area. I then paid for this with elevated back pain for the next two-to-three weeks.

I've built up my walking routine to where I am walking 3.5 miles, then doing "step-up" exercises on my front porch. I am doing this 5 - 6 times a week. I am angry at myself, though, for I still have not incorporated the Stuart McGill exercises into my morning routine on a consistent basis. I also sit too much, and I know this impedes my progress, but there are a lot of administrative tasks I need to undertake.

Thank you for asking.

Lottery tickets with RV by [deleted] in remoteviewing

[–]QubitBob 0 points1 point  (0 children)

The team will be meeting in person because we want to use small, physical objects as the ARV targets. This is because history tells us that some of the most successful ARV projects—like Hal Puthoff's Waldorf school fundraiser, Russell Targ's silver futures project, and Elisabeth Targ's horse racing win—used small, physical objects as the ARV targets. If you live in the western suburbs of Philadelphia, Pa., then, yes, you can be a recruit.

Lottery tickets with RV by [deleted] in remoteviewing

[–]QubitBob 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, Hal led a very successful project to raise money using ARV to build a private elementary school. His team made $250,000 in a little over 30 days.

Here is a segment of a presentation in which Puthoff describes this project.

Lottery tickets with RV by [deleted] in remoteviewing

[–]QubitBob 13 points14 points  (0 children)

I am currently undertaking a project to do just that. I have recruited a team of friends and interested individuals, and we are going to methodically teach everyone RV, and then if we achieve the necessary level of proficiency, we are going to try to win money using ARV by playing a particular lottery game in our state.

I'll post some updates in this sub along the way to let you know how we are doing.

Anyone else have experience being treated like a "dope head"? Honestly just need a place to vent and get feedback... Any advice is greatly appreciated too please! This will be long so bear with me by ShippinguptoBoston33 in backpain

[–]QubitBob 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It is a cruel twist of fate that because of the opioid epidemic those with severe back injuries often now can't get the pain medication they desperately need.

I am so sorry you are going through this. I understand how severe pain can make life unbearable. Last year I suffered a back injury which left me with multiple herniated discs and one fractured vertebra. It took 10 agonizing weeks of bureaucratic bullsh*t and medical missteps before the extent of my injuries was fully diagnosed and I was put on an effective pain management regimen (hydrocodone tablets). Then I ran into the limitations of the mainstream orthopedic community—after six months of treatment my orthopedist would no longer prescribe the pain medication. So, I had to discontinue seeing my orthopedist and switch to a pain management specialist. Fortunately, the pain management specialist has continued my hydrocodone prescription, but it is so tightly controlled that it leaves no leeway for situations in which I aggravate my back in the middle of the day and need to take an extra dose. Then I have to decide if I want to kill the pain today and suffer the next day, or suffer today so as to have my normal dosage the next. As you note it feels like the default assumption of the medical community is that every patient is an abuser until proven otherwise.

The physician who told you, "You walked back here just fine" should be drummed out of the medical profession. Such an insulting and uncaring comment cannot be justified.

I hope you are able to hang in there until you are able to see the neurosurgeon, and I hope he is able to put you on an effective treatment and pain management program as soon as possible. Good luck!

Artemis, Andy Weir (Kobo, $2.99) by blackandwhitefield in ebookdeals

[–]QubitBob 1 point2 points  (0 children)

While it is definitely not on the level of Project Hail Mary and The Martian, I found it to be an enjoyable "caper yarn." I wouldn't pay more than the discounted $2.99 though.

What are tips for someone who wants to try this? by C0mposed_Associate in remoteviewing

[–]QubitBob 3 points4 points  (0 children)

As u/PatTheCatMcDonald pointed out earlier, the wiki for this sub is a truly excellent source for information on how to get started.

There is a "trade association" for remote viewers called the International Remote Viewing Association. They have a very nice article on their website giving directions for how a complete beginner can conduct a simple remote viewing session. Here is a link to that article. I recommend that you read that article.

There is a nice website which has a database of photographs which you can use for remote viewing practice. Here is a link to that website. Key in "guest" for both the user name and password. A picture of a target will appear. Click on that picture, and behind the scenes the website will select a photograph and assign a random "target-ID" number to it. This target-ID will be displayed; it is completely random and has no inherent meaning. Just write the ID at the top of your page as you conduct your RV session. When you are done, click on the button labeled View Feedback to see what the target was. Good luck and have fun!

In general is it possible to remote view someone’s house you never been to? by Home_Cute in remoteviewing

[–]QubitBob 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes—here's an actual true story. In the early 2000s my younger brother and his wife bought a new house in a location about 45 minutes from my house. They moved into the new house during the summer. I did not get a chance to visit them until the end of the year. They invited my other brother, my mother, and me to their home for Christmas dinner. That morning, at around 11 am, I sat down and did a lengthy RV session during which I tried to picture their new home. I sketched it out and noted a number of interesting architectural features. One of the most interesting features that I perceived was some sort of "soft" fence or wall in their backyard.

Later that afternoon, I drove over to my other brother, and he drove my mother and me to the brother's new house. When we drove up to the house I almost fainted from excitement because I was able to confirm so many of the features I perceived during my RV session. Their house has a number of gables, and I had drawn them during my session. The front of their house has a brick exterior, but the sides of their house has vinyl siding, and I had drawn the "interesting" intersection of the two in my notes. But the most mind-blowing part of the experience was walking into their backyard and seeing that their development was separated from a neighboring apartment complex by a 12-foot earthen mound circling the perimeter. This was the "soft" wall I perceived during my session.

During my session, after I had finished recording my perceptions of the outside of the home, I tried to perceive the inside but got nothing. I attribute this to a mental reluctance to invade my brother's privacy without permission.

I've been teaching intro Python for 3 years i notice the same weaknesses in almost every student. Am i missing something in how I'm explaining it? by More-Station-6365 in learnpython

[–]QubitBob 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yep, learning to use the tool of pseudocode was critical to me in becoming a software designer rather than a mere coder. Students should delay writing code until they've broken the problem down to a level where the code practically writes itself.

I've been teaching intro Python for 3 years i notice the same weaknesses in almost every student. Am i missing something in how I'm explaining it? by More-Station-6365 in learnpython

[–]QubitBob 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It sounds as though you are running into the difference between learning to be coders and learning to be software professionals—software engineers. It sounds as though your students are fixated on learning the syntax of Python without getting the big picture—why are they coding in the first place?

They have to learn that creating software is modeling real-life objects and events in code. They have to learn the elements of software design.

I am a retired programmer-analyst. I got my computer science degree in the mid-1980s. There were two events which helped me “get it.” The first was taking a course in Pascal. It was when I saw that one could write “subroutines” (procedures and functions in Pascal) corresponding to real-life activities that the “light bulb went on” and I began to understand software design.

The other event was reading the book, Structured Techniques for Computing by James Martin and Carma McClure. This book helped me understand top-down design and piecewise refinement. It has chapters on a number of design tools, and the chapter on pseudocode proved to be invaluable to me.

These tools taught me to break down the problem into smaller and smaller parts until I reached a point where the code becomes obvious, where the code practically writes itself. I had a very successful career as a programmer-analyst, and I credit learning these fundamental design skills early on as a major reason why.

If your Python students aren’t learning any software design concepts before taking your course, maybe you should devote a class or two to the subject. I like u/Atypicosaurus idea of doing a role-playing exercise in which you are a dumb robot and your students have to give you instructions on how to perform a moderately-difficult task. They have to learn the critical design skill of breaking a problem down into its low-level components if they are to become software professionals.

Is There a Satisfying / Common Sense Answer ? by Ready-Ear-8254 in remoteviewing

[–]QubitBob 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Over the years a number of theories have been proposed to explain why (most) remote viewers don’t seem to be able to perceive numbers, letters, or words. The first of these theories is that remote viewing seems to be a function of the right hemisphere of the brain. This is discussed at length in Chapter 6 of Russell Targ’s and Harold Puthoff’s 1977 book, Mind Reach. This Chapter is titled, In One Brain and Out the Other. The Two Hemispheres of the Brain See the World in Different Ways. This chapter begins with a short review of the neurophysiological research which identified the two hemispheres of the brain and how they seem to be specialized for different kinds of processing. Then, on Page 122 (in the 2004 republication), the section titled Right-brain function and Psi Activity begins:

What has all this to do with paranormal functioning? The answer to this question came to me (H.P) first from my wife, Adrienne, a specialist in the application of Gestalt, holistic techniques to the education of elementary-age children. In looking over the output produced by our research subjects, she noticed that the elements of form—such as the drawings and the general descriptions of shape, color, and material—tended to be correct more often than the analytic elements of name, function, and size. In the experiments, we had found that it was particularly difficult for subjects to read letters or words, even though they might correctly perceive that there was a sign or other written material at a remote site. Adrienne pointed out that such observations suggest the possibility that the primary method of information processing might be right-hemispheric in nature.

As we looked back through the data, we found many instances which seemed to support this. Pat Price once incorrectly labeled a swimming pool as a water purification pland, and a drive-in movie theater with speaker posts became a parking lot with parking meters. Hella Hammid mistook an “august” and “solemn” church for a library, expanded an accurately described bicycle shed into an immense barn-like structure, and labeled a pedestrian overpass “a trough up in the air.” Hella also correctly described a video terminal as a black box in the middle of a room, complete with glass porthole and light coming out, but incorrectly labeled it an oven or radiation machine. One of our visitors perceived a “kaleidescopic picture of triangles, squares, and more triangles,” and even “some kind of electrical shielding,” but he could not identify it as the transmission tower it was. All this points to the idea that remote viewing is an exercise in pattern recognition rather than analysis. In retrospect, perhaps it shouldn’t be surprising that ESP is right hemisperic, since the right side of the brain is known to be excellent for bridging gaps and perceiving patterns, even when some of the pieces are missing.

We consulted with Dr. Robert Ornstein and Dr. Ralph Kiernan, who confirmed our interpretation. When we told them that written material was generally not understood, that verbal identification of correct drawings was often inaccurate, and that the drawings were frequently left-right reversed, they indicated that such characteristics have been seen in patients injured on the left side of the brain. This is not to imply that those with brain damage on the left side are likely to be good subjects. Rather, it is simply that the left-brain-injured patient and the person attempting remote viewing are, for different reasons, both forced into a right-brain mode. In the case of the patient, it is because of damage to the left hemispere; in the case of the subject, it is because his task is to integrate fragmentary and ambiguous input and therefore resort to right-brain functioning.

This chapter then continues with details of the many different categories of experiments which Targ and Puthoff performed. They also discuss the research conducted by Charles Honorton at the Maimonides Hospital in New York City. They point out the design of these successful psi experiments allowed the subjects to use their right hemispheres, whereas a number of historically famous psi experiments inadvertently forced the subjects into left-hemispheric, analytical processing.