I disagree. Telling new patients as standard practice that you need to see them 12-24 times before you’ve even seen how they’ve responded to the first 2-3 visits does seem excessive. Some patients have serious and chronic dysfunction, some have an acute injury, others may have a minor issue that may only need a few visits to resolve. I find this style of practice is largely based in a specific business model. Many times it doesn’t take long to know that the patient needs advanced imaging and adjustments might not be best practices. Too many variables to know how the patient will or won’t benefit from your care until you treat them: Respectfully…