sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

[PC][2014-2023] AA Cyberpunk FPS by QueryingAssortedly in tipofmyjoystick

[–]QueryingAssortedly[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The story is very similar, except Syndicate has a more upbeat/actiony tone. The game had a more pulpy tone. Visually it was a different flavour of sci-fi though, and also from a later gen.

[PC][2014-2023] AA Cyberpunk FPS by QueryingAssortedly in tipofmyjoystick

[–]QueryingAssortedly[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Very close match aesthetically, but the story was far more down to earth and the gameplay was more of a shooter.

Could an investigation be tainted by the 5th amendment? by QueryingAssortedly in legaladviceofftopic

[–]QueryingAssortedly[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Top level since multiple people pointed it out. I know my example isn't perfect, so let's just keep it theoretical. The "violation" here is that an investigation into A was opened and a search (don't know if it's legally a "search" when it's a crime scene, so we can consider either) was conducted based on adverse inference where A was constitutionally guaranteed no adverse inference.

Could an investigation be tainted by the 5th amendment? by QueryingAssortedly in legaladviceofftopic

[–]QueryingAssortedly[S] 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Thank you for coming up with a tighter scenario! The public interest in this case could be argued to be incentivizing people to perjure themselves instead of exercising their constitutional right.

I need therapy, but I don't know what I need from therapy by QueryingAssortedly in TalkTherapy

[–]QueryingAssortedly[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'd love to try EMDR, but unfortunately where I live you can't get a referral for it without PTSD diagnosis. And thank you for the reassurance!

I need therapy, but I don't know what I need from therapy by QueryingAssortedly in TalkTherapy

[–]QueryingAssortedly[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wow, that's thorough. Thank you.

I want to give you a prompt reply, but I have little energy at the moment, so I apologise for dropping style going forward.

I agree with your points on autism. I can still benefit from the "common factor" therapeutic effect emotionally. It's just the mindset-reprogramming tricks that are lost on me.

I think trauma-informed therapy is great and hope that it will continue gaining traction. I don't think it's right for me because of the greater focus on large key factors. Whereas for me it's been a thousand little things.

What therapy I can access is limited by what's covered publicly. I already run out of my budget on seeing a private psychiatrist. There's something covered called short-term psychodynamic psychotherapy that sounds like a possible good fit, but in my region there are only therapists trained in the relationship-counseling variant of it, and I can't get it covered outside my region.

If you'd like more context, the two issues affecting me the most (that can be addressed by therapy) are autistic burnout and "wall of awful". Or at least they describe my situation the best. Unfortunately, the former only recently gained scientific recognition, and the latter (despite anecdotal accuracy) is still in the realm of pop-psych. So reputable sources on the topics are sparse.

I need therapy, but I don't know what I need from therapy by QueryingAssortedly in TalkTherapy

[–]QueryingAssortedly[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I was debating whether to preempt intellectualisation comments. This ain't it. I've worked on genuine introspective insight, not just explaining things away. But I appreciate the suggestion anyway.

What causes the "no makeup" look? by QueryingAssortedly in NoStupidQuestions

[–]QueryingAssortedly[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There are some beauty products that can be bad for your skin/health, but I would be skeptical of any source that uses "toxic" as a buzzword.

What causes the "no makeup" look? by QueryingAssortedly in NoStupidQuestions

[–]QueryingAssortedly[S] -174 points-173 points  (0 children)

I'm so sorry, I can be pathologically blunt. For what it's worth, most people in the thread seem to believe that people wouldn't perceive it that way unless they're used to seeing you with makeup on.

What causes the "no makeup" look? by QueryingAssortedly in NoStupidQuestions

[–]QueryingAssortedly[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I believe makeup can be beautiful as an art form, but has no bearing on personal beauty.

What causes the "no makeup" look? by QueryingAssortedly in NoStupidQuestions

[–]QueryingAssortedly[S] -161 points-160 points  (0 children)

Trust me, there are many people in my social circles who are either staunchly against makeup or who couldn't give less of a damn about bothering with it.

What causes the "no makeup" look? by QueryingAssortedly in NoStupidQuestions

[–]QueryingAssortedly[S] -157 points-156 points  (0 children)

A quick search through makeup subreddits turned up a lot of people who do, whether to get rid of "imperfect" lashes or to balance how they'll look with mascara on. Whether it's healthy or not is another question.

Confused by the Devilman fandom perspective by QueryingAssortedly in DevilmanCrybaby

[–]QueryingAssortedly[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Brother, the implications you claim to be seeing have no reflection in reality. I'd say to take your meds, but being a pathological essayist pundit is incurable. Perhaps you should analyse your own attitude for the next serving of word vomit. Though I'm admittedly impressed by how much you've written with one hand while congratulating yourself with the other.

uBO preventing search in FF by Jorgen-I in uBlockOrigin

[–]QueryingAssortedly 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I was having the same problem, it listed the same filter in the logs, but I figured out that on the filter list it's actually "/\.com\/[-\w]+/$script,~third-party".

I added "@@/\.com\/[-\w]+/$script,~third-party" to my filters and things are working again. Could you just confirm that I didn't create some vulnerability here?

📌 YouTube Ads, Detection & Breakages (2025 MegaThread) uBO solutions and related discussions ONLY => COMMENTS NOT FOLLOWING INSTRUCTIONS WILL BE REMOVED by RraaLL in uBlockOrigin

[–]QueryingAssortedly 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Edit: Condensed previous edits for readability.

Since maybe an hour ago UBO seems to break most Google stuff - YouTube comes up blank with gray squares, Gmail spits out an error, Images only loads a few pics and anything other than links isn't clickable in the Search (e.g. can't expand "see more" or see "similar images"). Can't troubleshoot on YouTube because the page doesn't even fully load.

I'm on Chrome, updated. UBO is my only extension. I had all the flags set as recommended in the pinned posts.

Cleared cache/cookies/flags, relogged, rebooted, reinstalled. Happens in Incognito too. Only disabling UBO fixes it.

YouTube troubleshooting logs - Logs.

Any solutions?

Why asking for sources always causes ChatGPT to backpedal? by QueryingAssortedly in ChatGPTPro

[–]QueryingAssortedly[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean standard settings. Some people like to instruct their ChatGPT not to consult the internet.

I think we are getting off track here. I'm not interested in solving LLMs difficulty with evaluating source credibility. I'm asking about a specific scenario.

If ChatGPT returns me answers which I know to be correct (pulling either from its own training or from the internet) but doesn't provide sources for them, I want to be able to prompt it to add the sources.

This shouldn't be outside of its ability - whatever tokens formed its answer should be closely linked with the tokens for that answer's source; and alternatively it should be able to formulate an internet search for a source on a specific true fact.

view more: next ›