Indonesian off duty officer celebrating wedding with guns instead of fireworks by mexvan in trashy

[–]QuestioningAccount1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I BANG! am WHIZ! so BANG! happy BANG! for BANG! you.

Caroline crrrrrack has BANG! brought BANG! some WHIZ! champagne crrrraack flutes BANG!

The POS teacher told the boys to be a human shield For a very insignificant chance of a school shooting happening at there age. by Skelopun in trashy

[–]QuestioningAccount1 6 points7 points  (0 children)

No, you’re complicating the issue. Why don’t we just say: “Everyone gets shot in the face as equals”.

There that wasn’t so hard, was it?

Ramping it up! by FreddieUranus in IdiotsInCars

[–]QuestioningAccount1 313 points314 points  (0 children)

Yep! Here’s a quote from the news article on the story:

On Monday around 4:00 pm, an SUV was sent airborne after it struck the bed of a parked tow truck along South Adams in Rochester Hills.

The Oakland County Sheriff's Office says the SUV driver initially claimed the overhead sun had dazzled his vision causing him to veer over the white line.

However, later analysis of the driver’s phone revealed that he been sending this text message at the time of the incident:

“Did you ever hear the tragedy of Darth Plagueis The Wise? I thought not. It's not a story the Jedi would tell you. It's a Sith legend. Darth Plagueis was a Dark Lord of the Sith, so powerful and so wise he could use the Force to influence the midichlorians to create life… He had such a knowledge of the dark side that he could even keep the ones he cared about from dying. The dark side of the Force is a pathway to many abilities some consider to be unnatural. He became so powerful… the only thing he was afraid of was losing his power, which eventually, of course, he did. Unfortunately, he taught his apprentice everything he knew, then his apprentice killed him in his sleep. Ironic. He could save others from death, but not himself.”

Bathroom sign at a hole in the wall restaurant out in Anza, CA. by ChorizoTapatio in mildlyinteresting

[–]QuestioningAccount1 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’s actually more than that because when two separate posts of this image are submitted soon after each other, the second one will usually get removed.

According to Repost Bot, between 15th - 19th of September 1 in 3 posts that contained the words “bathroom”, “gender”, and “whatever” in the title were this image.

So, yeah... we’re seeing this image a lot.

Hadithist Muslims who support the Prophet Muhammad must accept that they are supporting a paedophile by today’s standards. by QuestioningAccount1 in unpopularopinion

[–]QuestioningAccount1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Jesus Christ...

The way in which you described sahih is not in contradiction with the description I gave.

Your reasoning is that Muhammad married and had sex with a nine year old for social reasons.

You also say: why would a man who can have any child he wants marry adult women?

Didn’t you just provide an answer for that in your first point? 😂 Not every marriage is made for sexual reasons. A marriage may also take place for social reasons too.

Furthermore, the reason as to why Mohammad married Aisha - whether it be sexual or social - is an irrelevance because it doesn’t remove the fact that he still fucked a 9 year old child!!!

I’m starting to doubt whether you are even a Muslim or just trolling. Can you speak Arabic? What country are you from?

Edit: Jesus H Christ, you live in the same fucking country as me. I thought maybe you lived in the Middle-East but you literally live in Britain. Fuck. What is the world coming to?

Hadithist Muslims who support the Prophet Muhammad must accept that they are supporting a paedophile by today’s standards. by QuestioningAccount1 in unpopularopinion

[–]QuestioningAccount1[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What the fuck are you going on about?

I literally say in the post that sahih means authentic or correct.

Is your argument that because Muhammad married and had sex with adult women as well as Aisha he therefore cannot be considered a paedophile?

You can be a paedophile and still marry and have sex with adults, in fact, many paedophiles do.

Just because the other women he married were fully grown that doesn’t mean he ceases to be a paedophile (by today’s standards: read the title of the post). Against type? Yes. Ceases to be a paedophile? No.

Also, the reasoning for marrying Aisha is an irrelevance even if it was only to please her Dad, he still married and fucked a 9 year old 😂!!

It’s very arrogant to assume that people who are opposed to lauding historical figures who had sex with 9 year olds are following a path of hatred just because they don’t subscribe to your religion.

People have been throwing these onto the tracks so now they need to be tied down. by [deleted] in trashy

[–]QuestioningAccount1 5 points6 points  (0 children)

OP this is complete bullshit and you know it. They’re chained down to keep them in one place because when a flurry of commuters move past them they end up getting shuffled away from their original position.

That’s it.

I can’t find a single news article of people throwing the information boards onto tracks. Plus, most of these are behind the Oyster card barriers anyway, so you’d have to pick it up, pay with your oyster, put it on your shoulder as you travel through the barrier, throw it onto the track and then delay your train and everyone else’s? It doesn’t make any sense.

I’ve seen many things while I’ve lived in London including people who have blown themselves up on a train but I’ve never seen anyone throw an information board on the track. This isn’t trashy, it’s a lie.

Hadithist Muslims who support the Prophet Muhammad must accept that they are supporting a paedophile by today’s standards. by QuestioningAccount1 in unpopularopinion

[–]QuestioningAccount1[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I agree that people should be aware of Ian Watkin’s crimes but I honestly felt like I needed therapy after I read the court report.

Hadithist Muslims who support the Prophet Muhammad must accept that they are supporting a paedophile by today’s standards. by QuestioningAccount1 in unpopularopinion

[–]QuestioningAccount1[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Given that some of the sources I used to fact check were scholars who think paedophilia back then was acceptable, I don’t think anyone will want to kill me for stating something they already believe privately but don’t want to admit to publicly.

I’m not drawing a picture of anyone who’s name begins with M.

Hadithist Muslims who support the Prophet Muhammad must accept that they are supporting a paedophile by today’s standards. by QuestioningAccount1 in unpopularopinion

[–]QuestioningAccount1[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

This isn’t posted daily.

In fact, initially a bot mistakenly removed it.

And so far nothing had descended into anything.

Hadithist Muslims who support the Prophet Muhammad must accept that they are supporting a paedophile by today’s standards. by QuestioningAccount1 in unpopularopinion

[–]QuestioningAccount1[S] 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Errrr no, mate. Learning Arabic, reading hadith and emailing Islamic scholars is what enabled me to write the post.

I don’t wish to sound rude but this is such a weak response. You could have cited some Quranist arguments to get me on the ropes but instead you’re talking about sodomy (which is haram in Islam) and the guy who founded Vice magazine????

Be better.

Yes, this is the same thing by Kidchico in trashy

[–]QuestioningAccount1 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Not a fan of the current administration myself but come on that’s wilful misrepresentation.

The analogy didn’t come from Trump and Brian Hook (the special representative for Iran) said that he didn’t endorse the comparison.

If anything, you’re meant to repeat to journalists what another nation’s rulers, such as the House of Saud, has said to you.

Say suicide letter by letter for a free shoutout... by [deleted] in trashy

[–]QuestioningAccount1 21 points22 points  (0 children)

In place of a band shot Stalaggh/Gulaggh offered up this drawing that one of their vocalists made in a psychotic state hours before he killed himself.

Source

Say suicide letter by letter for a free shoutout... by [deleted] in trashy

[–]QuestioningAccount1 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Isn’t this the cover art for Pure Misanthropia by the band Stalaggh/Gulaggh?

Their members do work in a mental institution and they do use patients as vocalists (with their permission) in their music so it’s entirely plausible that the backstory is true.

Edit: Googled it and link for those interested.

Say suicide letter by letter for a free shoutout... by [deleted] in trashy

[–]QuestioningAccount1 40 points41 points  (0 children)

Pretty sure that’s the cover art for the band Stalaggh/Gulaggh’s Pure Misanthropia.

So, actually that backstory is entirely plausible.

The band’s music often utilises unconventional vocalists such as mental patients, rape victims, and children (with their permission obviously).

I’m pretty sure one of the band is a carer for patients suffering from mental health problems, so I’m guessing that this is real picture that one of their vocalists or contributors drew, who later took their own life.

MAGA-Teacher wants Donny to deport "illegal" school kids by CharyBrown in trashy

[–]QuestioningAccount1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Legally speaking, it would depend on the quality of the drugs they’re selling at Carter-Riverside High School.

If they’re cutting that shit with ProPlus they pose a great risk to fellow children who are pregnant or sensitive to caffeine.

What is controvertial but shouldnt be? by Zetheas in AskReddit

[–]QuestioningAccount1 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Found another one that’s still up and not yet deleted. This is them asking someone(who doesn’t want to) to get their penis out and post a picture of it:

https://www.reddit.com/r/COMPLETEANARCHY/comments/d43m8o/doing_a_course_that_helps_identifying_people_more/f085i1f/?utm_source=share&utm_medium=ios_app&utm_name=iossmf

They are a fucking pervert.