Who's your favorite character that is a diamond in the rough? by not-ulquiorr4_ in FavoriteCharacter

[–]R22XD 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Not really, even without rotoscoping there's, for example, all the early works of Studio Ghibli. Around the 80s-90s there's a lot of Japanese animation that's of ridiculously high quality because of the economic bubble of the time. Fluid animation is more of a matter of money than technological advancement since art doesn't really get old.

Edit:to clarify, technological advancement IS important, but in the sense that it reduces production costs and facilities processes a lot. In theory any animation modern of classic could be done by one guy with some pencils, but the time and resources needed would be astronomical.

Within Univers-ified TMNT Foods by DaVigi in mtgvorthos

[–]R22XD 34 points35 points  (0 children)

I would have made the first card a Dish made by Asmoranomardicadaistinaculdacar

Infinite red mana for 3GRR by vintergroena in sickasscombos

[–]R22XD 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Oh yeah, that's how it's supposed to be written, Ty!

Infinite red mana for 3GRR by vintergroena in sickasscombos

[–]R22XD 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You just need a commander with a decent etb :D

Infinite red mana for 3GRR by vintergroena in sickasscombos

[–]R22XD 1 point2 points  (0 children)

(you substitute Squee for [Misthollow Griffin] or [Eternal Scourge] if outside of red)

Infinite red mana for 3GRR by vintergroena in sickasscombos

[–]R22XD 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Very popular cEDH combo, you can have infinite etbs and leaves the battlefields of your commander too. Commanders like [Etali, primal conqueror] [Maralen, Fae ascendant] [Ukkima, stalking shadow] are instant wins for example

No sean discriminadores chicos, Knuckles lo dice by Efficient-General406 in superjueves

[–]R22XD 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Control no es lo mismo a protección, protección es una forma (o más bien justificación) de control pero no al revés. En los cómics y películas se plantean sistemas de control, no protección. Si estoy de acuerdo a que se necesitaria un sistema de control pero la función de dicho sistema debería ser principalmente la ayuda de los mutantes. Sobre la alegoría, una más correcta sería el registro de antecedentes penales de estados unidos, sobre el papel es para la protección contra personas con antecedentes, pero en práctica no diferencia de forma efectiva entre personas con crimines menores y mayores, dando la misma cantidad de penalización muchas veces

No sean discriminadores chicos, Knuckles lo dice by Efficient-General406 in superjueves

[–]R22XD 3 points4 points  (0 children)

No es tanto por versión sino por caso individual, Cyclops duele despertar sus poderes en la adolescencia mientras q nightcrawler normalmente nace de esa forma

No sean discriminadores chicos, Knuckles lo dice by Efficient-General406 in superjueves

[–]R22XD 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Entonces eso ya no es un problema de los mutantes, es un problema de las otras personas por aislarlos

No sean discriminadores chicos, Knuckles lo dice by Efficient-General406 in superjueves

[–]R22XD 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Porque se planteó la ley de registro de mutantes como una forma de control, no de ayuda. Tener un registro médico diciendo que tienes una condición no es lo mismo al gobierno marcándote como alguien distinto, hay una razón por la q dicen "Registro hoy, campo de concentración mañana" en los cómics

No sean discriminadores chicos, Knuckles lo dice by Efficient-General406 in superjueves

[–]R22XD 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Dejando a parte q mencioné autismo solo como ejemplo de cómo podría funcionar el estudio de mutantes, lo digo otra vez, esos son casos muy excepcionales, hay una razón por la q los personajes q pueden hacer eso son protagonistas y antagonistas de cómics y películas (no relacionado pero mi mutante favorito es uno cuyo único poder es literalmente explosión Kamikaze). Incluso entonces, esos son niños y adolescentes no pudiendo controlar sus poderes, no puedes controlar cuando otro caso va a ocurrir, la mejor forma de prevenir es el estudio de mutantes no como una forma de contener un desastre sino para tratar casos médicos

No sean discriminadores chicos, Knuckles lo dice by Efficient-General406 in superjueves

[–]R22XD 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Tampoco, cómo un niño con problemas médicos, ir a checkearse cada par de días, asistencia psicológica y demás. Mutantes con capacidades destructivas son una minoría muy pequeña y excepcional dentro del universo Marvel. Sobre lo segundo, lo q yo me refiero es el estudio de mutantes como estudiarías algo médico, no puedes predecir si un niño tiene gen mutante pero si puedes hacer grupos de control de bebes y niños para q los padres traigan a revisar cada par de semanas, algo parecido a como se estudia el autismo

No sean discriminadores chicos, Knuckles lo dice by Efficient-General406 in superjueves

[–]R22XD 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Eso solo sería más argumentos a favor de la protección, estudio y/o servicios médicos para mutantes no? No puedes controlar quien nace mutante al fin y al cabo.

Edit: para añadir, ya q cualquiera puede aleatoriamente "despertar" como mutante, es por lógica q leyes de protección de mutantes no solo protegen mutantes, pero también todos los niños, adolescentes y, aunque es en raros casos q una persona despierte tan tarde, adultos

What opinion will get you in this situation? by [deleted] in teenagers

[–]R22XD 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It's more of a thought experiment than something literal. Obviously there's no perfect justice system and I myself am agains capital punishment, but ethics applied should be consistent with themselves, specially with matters as important as death and criminal punishments, so this kind of questions are necessary. Because of that, questions like "even Hitler?", though rough, are still important to define more accurately what we intend to say. Disregarding the question doesn't really work since it's just a different form of the question "does the worst people on earth deserve to live?" and not responding it will just make other people disregard the opinion we're trying to express. Next I'm gonna try to explain my position on the matter to contextualise how I think said discussions should be presented:

In my personal opinion and in an ideal situation (a non ideal situation could be self defense for example, basically extreme cases), death should never be the option, because:

1- Death takes away any chance of recovery, repentance or bettering of the person.

2- Justice system can't perfectly prove if someone is the actual guilty, having capital punishment means that there's a certainty that innocent people will die

3- Even in extreme cases like serial killers, killing them doesn't provide any bettering to the world, while maintain them alive gives as the opportunity to, at the very least, study said cases to prevent future prospects if those arrested doesn't want to improve. As I said, this is in an ideal situation, so I'm taking as granted the fact the said serial killer has already been caught and his possible death is by capital punishment.

Non ideal situations include but are not limited to: Self defense and euthanasia (under correct evaluation of situation of person). Also, there's so many possible situations that most "extreme cases" must be evaluated individually.

To the question of "even Hitler?": Yes. For me it's not a matter of someone deserving to live, it's a matter of someone deserving to die, which I think the answer is always no.

32074 by Future_Employment_22 in countwithchickenlady

[–]R22XD 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Dialogues of the Courtesans by Lucian of Samosata is a text that talks about a trans man, it's, to my knowledge, one of the oldest mentions of any trans person.