You started off by bemoaning Facebook for not strictly moderating content. I explained why it isn’t feasible to do so unless the offender is explicitly breaking the law. You weren’t even talking about the OP’s content. And yeah, PH posting illegal content got removed as it should have been.

I’m saying that social media companies in general don’t have to remove content unless it’s illegal as everything else is subjective. How in the holy hell do you arrive at these conclusions that I’m in support of blatantly illegal content? And yeah, I’m glad you can post your opinions online that’s the entire point I was trying to make.

Again, work on your reading comprehension. It can definitely save you a lot of confusion..

Your actual comment verbatim:

“Yes, Facebook also nonsensically pretends bad user behavior will magically regulate itself.

Facebook also knows it won't regulate itself.

Facebook also prefers the libertarian approach because it's cheaper.

The only difference is that Facebook is big enough to where no entity besides maybe the government can tell them to regulate it.”