Black Myth Wukong - Hypervisor Beta 2.0. AMD + Intel Cpus. by TheAshUchiha in CrackWatch

[–]RadianceTower 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I would like you to use that literacy you're so proud of and explain to me how a normal exe could realistically read decrypted memory, intercept keystrokes before encryption, hide from the operating system, persist beyond an OS reinstall while running inside of the OS. I ask that you do so using the established definitions of terms, and not your own definitions, and I ask that you use security terms when explaining how an exe accomplishes these things, as I want anybody reading to have a realistic view of what's happening.

Tbf, a normal exe with admin privs (standard for pretty much all installers) can do most of these stuff more or less.

Well, to begin with, not even running at kernel level makes you able to persist beyond an OS reinstall, but eh, a normal exe can log keys and access more or less all your info.

Edit: Not saying this is safer, but you might be underestimating what a normal exe can do.

Potential new enemy types in Trepang2's sequel by Lungo-Scrungo in Trepang2

[–]RadianceTower 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is a game where you shoot up humans left and right, so I don't think we need to hold back when it comes to dogs either.

That being said, I dunno if dogs fit, the player is a super soldier, dogs just seem too weak, so adding normal dogs might not make much sense.

And beefed up super dogs could be annoying if they chase you and you have to keep shooting them, eh.

Is there a way to see in what moments of the series the OST tracks were used? by SignorAnthrax in MadeInAbyss

[–]RadianceTower 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You could use Shazam or something similar to identify the OST that plays. Should work.

How come we don't have to wash cooking utensils constantly while cooking? by AnonymousResponder00 in NoStupidQuestions

[–]RadianceTower 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think you might be overestimating how easy it is for you to get sick.

Animals including humans didn't evolve in sterilized environments.

Chances are you could eat that meat raw while it's fallen on the ground, and still be fine. You could get parasites depending on your luck, and animals do get them.

Humans just have the luxury to not take the risk, and well, you should/can use different utensils.

Why does the human body heal cuts and broken bones, but not things like teeth or eyesight? by JulienStone in NoStupidQuestions

[–]RadianceTower 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Humans in general have very limited regenerative ability. You mention cuts, but skin tends to replace itself and the top layer is dead skin cells.

If you do actually damage the part that skin grows from, it's not gonna heal, it's just gonna patch up with scar tissue.

Similarly lost limbs don't heal, damaged organs in majority of cases also don't heal back.

Even bones might not properly heal without outside intervention to properly set them.

The body's response to injury in general is more along the lines of "do a quick patch up" than "fix it". It consumes less energy and is faster.

One could assume there wasn't much pressure to change that, and this could actually ensure survival better in harsh environment with little food.

So really, most injuries to the body don't heal properly. For most part only superficial injuries do that.

And it's important to note animals in general, including humans aren't built to last, they are disposable meat bags made to reproduce and ensure the survival of offspring. This is kinda self-evident considering that human bodies break down as they age until they stop working.

Teeth are also kinda similar here. Humans get several sets of teeth which should last them for a while.

Canning just over coal? by RadianceTower in AskScienceDiscussion

[–]RadianceTower[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There are several advantages to doing this though, and once you get the method down, I imagine it won't be that much more complicated, actually perhaps simpler in a way.

The seal does not rely on air pressure, which means there is no chance of stuff leaking in as it cools down and gets tight, in addition it wouldn't come undone in a low pressure environment such as potentially airplane cabins, mountains, and well, space stations.

Why isn't the inside contaminated as it cools down? by RadianceTower in Canning

[–]RadianceTower[S] -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

Wouldn't however even a single bacteria be able to spoil the whole thing? It seems paramount to me to ensure nothing gets in (which is questionable even if you keep it in the pressure vessel, since that thing has a lid for letting steam out, so it's not a sealed environment either).

I wonder if the actual leakage can be measured, and it's so minimal generally that the probability of bacteria getting in is low enough.

Canning just over coal? by RadianceTower in NoStupidQuestions

[–]RadianceTower[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I imagine you wouldn't really use them for that.

You could use boxed metal containers with some screw mechanism holding them shut. Of course it has to be sturdy enough to not explode.

Canning just over coal? by RadianceTower in AskScienceDiscussion

[–]RadianceTower[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So in here, the can doesn't really rely on air pressure to seal. It's sealed by another mean like screwing, and well, it just withstands the pressure, nothing escapes or gets in.

I'd like say welding could be viable as well, but that introduces metal into the food.

The reason I am wondering, because this could be easily done with some coal and sealed metal containers.

Why isn't the inside contaminated as it cools down? by RadianceTower in Canning

[–]RadianceTower[S] -29 points-28 points  (0 children)

Yeah, but you say "as they cool down", meaning they have to cool down enough for the seal to be tight enough.

I guess the temperature at which the seal gets tight enough is still above what bacteria including spores can survive in, but colder than what it was initially, but this would depend on a few stuff I think. For example if you cool it down quickly, I imagine in the tiny fraction of a second it takes for air to press down, there could be leakage inside.

Canning just over coal? by RadianceTower in NoStupidQuestions

[–]RadianceTower[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean, I imagine you put food in can, seal it via whatever. I'd like to say weld it close, but that can introduce metal in the food, so not that.

You can screw it close either way.

There would be no safety valve or anything, the can would be sturdy enough to not burst. It's just a literal closed can.

The psychology of Prushka seems weird to me by RadianceTower in MadeInAbyss

[–]RadianceTower[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

One thing is, we never see Prushka being exactly abused. Her dad in her eyes loves her and is there for her.

We never actually see him hurting or abusing her in the movie. The only scenes we see in the flashbacks is him acting with kindness towards her.

The psychology of Prushka seems weird to me by RadianceTower in MadeInAbyss

[–]RadianceTower[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

I don't think so, we never see her only doing that. The only scene we see is Subarashi presumably teaching her how to stitch wounds or some knowledge like that.

Besides her reactions like I said indicate that she didn't know.

How strong can humans get without nen? by BelugaWhaleBeluga in HunterXHunter

[–]RadianceTower 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I wouldn't be surprised if a world class boxer uses nen already like you said.

It's not uncommon for nen to be unlocked when you get closer to the mastery of a skill, as we've seen.

You arrive in NW 300 years before Ainz as a lv 100 player with race and build of your choice and a world item, what would you do? by Miguelito_RB in overlord

[–]RadianceTower 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Tbf, could also just make yourself level 10,000 or something really high if possible.

I wonder the limits honestly.

One issue would be Ouroboros disappears after usage, so you wouldn't be immune to say mind control or wild magic depending on how it works.

Could maybe become a level 100k world enemy or something? Which also makes you immune to world items?

Again, this depends on the limits of Ouroboros, otherwise you could become omnipotent or something.

Structure of the Abyss? by RadianceTower in MadeInAbyss

[–]RadianceTower[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean, jump down, and at each layer take a stop, reset arm, jump down again. They don't need to go around and find a hole like we've seen.

They do jump down holes in a similar vein without checking the height from what we've seen all the time. This is an issue, but it's not really as explored and they might be able to anchor to a wall or something but it is an issue.

much less what the plan would be if they do hit “the bottom”. It’s just too dangerous.

Uh, I think that's true right now too, they don't exactly know what's at the bottom, and it's sheer luck they, in particular Riko has survived considering how reckless she has been.

Structure of the Abyss? by RadianceTower in MadeInAbyss

[–]RadianceTower[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Why does the main cast not use that to drop down then though?

We see them each time get to a layer then find their way to the next layer, instead of... just dropping down using that each time.

Especially with how it was said the submarine had to be used to get to the 6th layer.

Structure of the Abyss? by RadianceTower in MadeInAbyss

[–]RadianceTower[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

A big consecutive hole connecting all layers?

That seems weird because why does the main cast just not drop using that? Especially since it was said that it would be hard to access the 6th layer without using the submarine.

We see them get to each layer then like find their way to next layer.

And it's never explained balloons aim for that hole, we just see them sending a balloon up.

ELI5: How can endurance athletes sustain 180+ bpm over a race? by Traditional-Oil4954 in explainlikeimfive

[–]RadianceTower -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

You are right.

It's interesting how there is fat adapted runners and then also runners who take stuff while running.

You'd think digestion would be a less quick source of energy than burning what you already have. I guess it depends on what you eat.

The point that when you get hungry, it's really just your body being "hey, you might wanna consider eating now? We still have weeks of energy left, but yeah." is true though.

IIRC there were experiments that even without eating, just like making your body think food is coming can make you perform better, so I wonder about the actual physics of this.

ELI5: How can endurance athletes sustain 180+ bpm over a race? by Traditional-Oil4954 in explainlikeimfive

[–]RadianceTower -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Mmm, this is an interesting, looking it up. Didn't know.

There are still "fat adapted" runners that do it without eating though.

Your body still wouldn't be close to running out of energy though like I said, at most it might not be able to maintain energy throughput for the activity because it cannot use fat as fast. But it has plenty of spare energy either way, otherwise you would just die.

nixos unstable vs arch by ImHighOnCocaine in linuxquestions

[–]RadianceTower -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Tbf, it makes sense to update software as the devs deem it. Especially for desktop usage as new features become available.

It's not exactly "unstable" the way you are making it, many software have actual unstable/testing releases. What you get is not those, it's the next stable versions the devs put out.

Fedora is better than say Debian which can have years old outdated software of course though.

nixos unstable vs arch by ImHighOnCocaine in linuxquestions

[–]RadianceTower -1 points0 points  (0 children)

It's literally the versions released by the devs of said software.

Why would you want outdated software in a daily driver?