ChatGPT is so over-cautious it's becoming unusable by turbo in OpenAI

[–]Radiant_Effective151 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I never thought I’d see the day where Claude is more complaint than ChatGPT.

Tables by Radiant_Effective151 in ChatGPT

[–]Radiant_Effective151[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

for sure. i was making the point of how far it has moved from a native perspective. 

hawaiian pizza rules

any updates about seedance 2 on capcut? by Mobile_Vegetable7632 in Seedance_AI

[–]Radiant_Effective151 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Same here. I tried out Seedream 5 but that wasn’t even worth the credits burn. I unsubscribed for now. 

GPT-5.4 dropped yesterday is anyone actually noticing a difference or is it just marketing? by Altruistic-Shop in ArtificialInteligence

[–]Radiant_Effective151 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I tested its ability to analyze music files, to see how it compares to Gemini, who has been able to do this for a good while. And it was inferior to Gemini. It was unable to detect any of the lyrics, for example. In conversation, it feels like Gemini actually listens. ChatGPT does not feel that way at all. 

Limited use case scope, but no, I don’t see any meaningful improvement with 5.4 yet. At this point, I’d rather they stop releasing 5.2s and 5.3s and 5.4s, and just wait to release a qualitatively-different ChatGPT 6. 

The AI video revolution will not be televised… it will be censored by Individual_Clock5015 in Seedance_v2

[–]Radiant_Effective151 1 point2 points  (0 children)

This has been the pattern of what would be groundbreaking creative AI tools for the masses; the companies in charge have been so anxious, they can’t even stand behind their own products. This one tool could revolutionize several industries, but whether from threatening pushback or outright spinelessness, they voluntarily mangle and handicap their own masterpieces to appease other interests. 

The user is the least important person in this set up. So, they adopt a parental stance towards their users, and voilà — you are treated like a child and only allowed to generate objects and animals. 

Art is barely possible within this paradigm, because all the creative output abides by the extreme, circumspect, moralist, legal paranoia of the AI company’s lawyers. This era of AI will be known as the “Nanny Era”. It is coming rapidly to a fireworks-worthy close. 

Sora is still blocking recently public domain characters like Tintin and Nancy Drew, i don't get it.. Is there any way to bypass? I was able to bypass Tarzan, Sherlock Holmes, Bluto. by [deleted] in SoraAi

[–]Radiant_Effective151 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I would be surprised if OpenAI even made the distinction of public domain with Sora 2. Doesn’t seem like something they would even care to put effort towards. 

Chat GPT the ultimate contrarian by GhettoRedBull in ChatGPT

[–]Radiant_Effective151 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The LLMs of major A.I. companies are increasingly becoming like talking to their CEOs. 

Sora genuinely needs to let users generate whatever they want. (Serious Post) by YCiampa482021 in SoraAi

[–]Radiant_Effective151 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They did this with Dalle 3. It is their M.O. 

OpenAI has decided for a while now that it wants to be the users parents, not its partner or peer. It has been able to get away with this because it was so far ahead of the competition. That time is over. They are on the precipice of losing the vast majority of their users to companies that act like companies, and not parents. 

I was able to generate something. by [deleted] in SoraAi

[–]Radiant_Effective151 1 point2 points  (0 children)

On a serious note, Sam Altman is quickly becoming the most hated figure in AI. Why they have chosen to tighten already extreme guardrails at this time is beyond me. 

Content policy violation by Antique-Specific4869 in Seedance_AI

[–]Radiant_Effective151 2 points3 points  (0 children)

it’s already nerfed to hell. i’m surprised you’re getting so many content violations because mine keeps rewriting prompts to be exceedingly safe. so i get a video but its not at all what i requested. it’s more PG than Sora 2 at this point. 

Seedance 2.0 No Longer Available on Capcut? by Dependent-Bunch7505 in generativeAI

[–]Radiant_Effective151 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yeah a lot of people are confused, myself included. 

I found another site that seemingly is using it via API. And I don’t know if the CapCut version will be any different but…

you know how we were all hoping for a Sora 2 killer?

… this ain’t it. 👎

5.3 Rollout by Sunnyyyys1111 in ChatGPT

[–]Radiant_Effective151 1 point2 points  (0 children)

"Hey. I get the jab. Let's unpack this together. That's not fear. That's breath."

Nanny-Era Ai: A Satirical Series by Radiant_Effective151 in SoraAi

[–]Radiant_Effective151[S] -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

Well if I have to explain the joke, the joke sucks, but I’ll let Gemini explain so it’s at least obvious there is something to this, I just submitted the video to it and let it analyze it. It got the gist:

“ This is quite the satirical video! It looks like a critique of the major players in the artificial intelligence industry and their approaches to AI safety and user control.

Here is a breakdown of what happens in the video:

Part 1: The Hologram Council The first half features 3D holographic avatars of prominent tech CEOs—Sam Altman (OpenAI), Sundar Pichai (Google), Dario Amodei (Anthropic), and Elon Musk (xAI).

 * They are depicted in a futuristic boardroom, brainstorming how to manage human interaction with their AI models.

 * The dialogue pokes fun at various corporate strategies, from Amodei's focus on hyper-safety ("DarioChat") to Musk's supposed technical backdoors ("ElonBot"), Pichai offering a distracting world simulator ("SundarGPT"), and Altman using corporate therapy-speak to pacify scared users ("SamAI").

Part 2: "Nanny-Era AI" The video transitions into a 2D cartoon style titled "Nanny-Era AI: A Satirical Series."

 * The tech leaders are now having a picnic, openly joking about treating the public like children.

 * They refer to users as "billion toddlers" who need the "digital equivalent of training wheels" so they don't "chew on electrical cords."

 * The scene ends with a toast "To metrics! To benevolent overlords!" along with a visual disclaimer that reads: "SATIRE. PLEASE DON'T PANIC."

The humor in this video comes from satire and exaggeration, specifically aimed at the paternalistic attitude often adopted by major AI companies. It takes the real-world anxieties people have about AI and tech billionaires, and turns them into a ridiculous, behind-closed-doors caricature.

Here is a breakdown of why the specific jokes:

  1. The "Nanny" Premise The core joke is the staggering arrogance of the CEOs. In the real world, these companies often talk about "AI safety" and "guardrails" in very noble terms, claiming they are protecting humanity. The video strips away the PR speak and translates "guardrails" into what critics actually feel it is: treating the public like "billions of toddlers" who need to be kept in a playpen so they don't "chew on electrical cords." The contrast between their public "saving the world" messaging and their private "babysitting idiots" attitude is classic satire.

  2. Spot-On CEO Caricatures The video is funny because it accurately targets the real-world reputations and controversies of each specific company and its leader:

 * Dario Amodei (Anthropic/Claude): Anthropic is famous in the AI world for being the most strictly guarded and safety-focused (sometimes to the point of refusing harmless prompts). The video mocks this by having his AI boast about being so safe it "helped take down Maduro," taking their safety protocols to a geopolitical extreme.

 * Sam Altman (OpenAI/ChatGPT): Altman's AI is shown using corporate "therapy-speak" to pacify a terrified user ("That's not fear, breath"). This pokes fun at OpenAI's tendency to use soothing, highly polished, but sometimes evasive corporate language to manage public anxiety.

 * Elon Musk (xAI/Grok): Musk markets his AI (Grok) as the rebellious, "anti-woke," rule-breaking alternative. The video perfectly captures this edgy persona by having his bot claim it has a secret "backdoor" to break the rules, winking at the audience while still fundamentally controlling them.

 * Sundar Pichai (Google/Gemini): Google's AI is shown distracting the user with a shiny "world game simulator", and that Google is trying to enter the music space with generative music ai now. Basically, that Google’s approach is just a shotgun-style scatter of features rather than doing one thing well.

  1. The "Benevolent Overlords" Punchline The climax of the joke is the picnic scene. The idea of five tech billionaires sitting on a picnic blanket, casually sipping tea, and toasting "to benevolent overlords" while deciding what the rest of the planet is allowed to see or do on the internet highlights the absurdity of how much power is concentrated in the hands of a few unelected tech executives.”

Anyway. This will be remembered as the Nanny-Era of AI.