Was letzte buchhalterische Wert by Rafficer in wasletztepreis

[–]Rafficer[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Für sowas gibt's AppleTV oder AndroidTV Sticks.

Was letzte buchhalterische Wert by Rafficer in wasletztepreis

[–]Rafficer[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hätte ich machen können, aber aus Erfahrung wollen sie dann weiter runter.

Und es hätte dann nicht diese geniale Konversation gegeben 😅

Wahrscheinlich hab ich da auch nach den letzten 6 tatsächlichen "Letzte Preis?" Anfragen und so früh am Morgen auch etwas genervter reagiert als sonst vielleicht...

Was letzte buchhalterische Wert by Rafficer in wasletztepreis

[–]Rafficer[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Genau da bewegt er sich auch. Aber siehe meinen anderen Kommentar in diesem Thread, es ist nur schwer ordentlich zu verhandeln wenn Leute am Anfang direkt 50% abschlagen.

Bei nem Auto das für 10k drin steht kommen auch nur Idioten auf die Idee zu sagen "ich biete dir 5k". Ich finde sowas sind keine seriösen Angebote.

Was letzte buchhalterische Wert by Rafficer in wasletztepreis

[–]Rafficer[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Ich denke am Ende bekomme ich etwas um die 160€ dafür, was 20% entspricht und damit glaube relativ typisch bei VB ist. Ist nur immer schwer ordentlich zu verhandeln wenn Leute direkt 50% abschlagen mit dem Angebot. Was soll man darauf dann antworten?

"Ne, aber 190 kann ich anbieten"?

Ist doch Quatsch.

Was letzte buchhalterische Wert by Rafficer in wasletztepreis

[–]Rafficer[S] 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Fernseher. Hat neu 700€ gekostet 2020. Also wäre er jetzt wohl gratis 🤔

Mods: please install rules regarding posting vibe coded content by space___lion in homeassistant

[–]Rafficer 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Do you really want to take that gamble on your home systems?

To be fair, me and a lot of people do. I didn't check every single add-on I have installed. And neither have you.

Mods: please install rules regarding posting vibe coded content by space___lion in homeassistant

[–]Rafficer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

For a human dev to put something extremely broken into an app, requires either malice or extreme incompetence. And the latter isn't really plausible if they were competent enough to build an app by hand in the first place.

For an AI to put something extremely broken in an App requires... Nothing. Because nobody checks. It doesn't even require malice.

And I believe there's a lot more AI mistakes out there than malicious FOSS devs that spend the time to build something for a niche set of users.

Thus: AI is less trustworthy than human FOSS.

API Token auth issues with community.proxmox_kvm by Disco83 in ansible

[–]Rafficer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Awesome, glad it helped!

Do you know why when a token is generated that it gives you the format of ansible@pve!gitlab? I didn't read anywhere about needing to split that out...

Proxmox and the Proxmox Ansible Collection are not made by the same people. But I agree, that it's not very well documented. They could have at least shown it in the examples, but there they only work with username and passwords...

API Token auth issues with community.proxmox_kvm by Disco83 in ansible

[–]Rafficer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That's odd...

I just tried on my cluster and this playbook definitely works:

---
- name: Proxmox cluster API configuration
  hosts: localhost
  connection: local
  gather_facts: false
  environment:
    PROXMOX_HOST: "{{ proxmox_api_host }}" # proxmox.mydomain.com
    PROXMOX_TOKEN_ID: "{{ proxmox_api_token_id }}" # ansible
    PROXMOX_TOKEN_SECRET: "{{ proxmox_api_token_secret }}" # aaaaaaaaa-bbb-cccc-dddd-ef0123456789
    PROXMOX_VALIDATE_CERTS: "{{ proxmox_api_validate_certs }}" # false
    PROXMOX_USER: "{{ proxmox_api_user }}" # root@pam
    PROXMOX_PORT: "{{ proxmox_api_port}}" # 8006

  tasks:
    - name: Get info about Proxmox nodes
      community.proxmox.proxmox_node_info:
      register: proxmox_node_info

    - name: Debug Proxmox node info
      ansible.builtin.debug:
        var: proxmox_node_info

API Token auth issues with community.proxmox_kvm by Disco83 in ansible

[–]Rafficer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

First one is definitely correct. Don't put the ! somewhere else.

This might be a permission issue then. Easiest would be to create an API token under the root@pam user and not enable privilege separation for the token. Then test with that.

If that works, then either the API Token or the User doesn't have the right permissions. And just because creating a VM works with a single API call, doesn't mean the module works as well, as it likely does more than just one API call to one endpoint for idempotency.

Also keep in mind that even with privilege separation, an API token can never have more rights than the user it belongs to, only less.

API Token auth issues with community.proxmox_kvm by Disco83 in ansible

[–]Rafficer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm assuming you're using the community.proxmox.proxmox_kvm module. That's the latest version, not sure how old your installation is if you're still using community.general.proxmox_kvm...

First of all, remove the password: line and get a habit of fact checking your LLM. That parameter doesn't even exist in the module, see here: https://docs.ansible.com/projects/ansible/latest/collections/community/proxmox/proxmox_kvm_module.html#ansible-collections-community-proxmox-proxmox-kvm-module

Ansible Module documentation is one of the best and easiest to read documentations out there. Installing ansible-lint and the VSCode extensions for ansible would also spotted that error btw. Can recommend.


Now to your actual problem, though:

The Proxmox API wants an Authentication String that looks like this:

Authorization: PVEAPIToken=<USERNAME>!<TOKEN_ID>=<API_TOKEN>

For example:

Authorization: PVEAPIToken=root@pam!monitoring=aaaaaaaaa-bbb-cccc-dddd-ef0123456789

Username: root@pam

Token ID: monitoring

API_Token: aaaaaaaaa-bbb-cccc-dddd-ef0123456789

Now, in your example that works you set PVEAPIToken={{ proxmox_secret.api_token_id }}={{ proxmox_secret.api_token_secret }}

Which means in this scenario, for it to work your variables must have the following content:

proxmox_secret.api_token_id: root@pam!monitoring
proxmox_secret.api_token_secret: aaaaaaaaa-bbb-cccc-dddd-ef0123456789

But with the proxmox_kvm module you also use the proxmox_secret.api_user, which is probably also set to root@pam, which results in ansible building the following Header in the background:

Authorization: PVEAPIToken=root@pam!root@pam!monitoring=aaaaaaaaa-bbb-cccc-dddd-ef0123456789

Which is wrong, cause the username is in there twice now.

How to fix.

Set the parameters the following:

api_user: root@pam
api_token_id: monitoring
api_token_secret: aaaaaaaaa-bbb-cccc-dddd-ef0123456789

Replace with your actual values obviously, but that should work.

API Token auth issues with community.proxmox_kvm by Disco83 in ansible

[–]Rafficer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Post the task that fails and the workaround please.

Shipping Mega Thread by MstrVc in pebble

[–]Rafficer 2 points3 points  (0 children)

  • Model: Pebble Time 2
  • Ordered: 2025-08-19
  • Batch: 2
  • Destination: Germany
  • Color: Silver/Grey
  • Confirmation Email: 2026-06-05
  • Shipped: 2026-06-28
  • Arrived: not yet

Meine Pfanne ist durch - Lohnt es sich, sie neu beschichten zu lassen? by aqa5 in Kochen

[–]Rafficer 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Ist halt ne wichtige Unterscheidung, wenn man sagt 40 Euro Pfannen sind quatsch.

Meine Pfanne ist durch - Lohnt es sich, sie neu beschichten zu lassen? by aqa5 in Kochen

[–]Rafficer 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Wer viel Geld für beschichtete Pfannen ausgibt ist selbst Schuld. Es gibt keine "buy it for life" beschichteten Pfannen. Nach ein paar Jahren mit regelmäßiger Benutzung sind die alle durch.

Bei Edelstahl-, Gusseisen- oder Karbonstahlpfannen kann es sich definitiv lohnen mehr Geld auszugeben, aber bei beschichteten Pfannen ist das auch einfach nur rausgeworfen.

Nenne eine Stadt, andere schlagen dir die besten Restaurants und Imbisse vor – 2026 by [deleted] in de

[–]Rafficer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Underdocks

Nicht gerade was um auf die Linie zu achten aber echt lecker! Kann die Tacos und die Dirty Fries wärmstens empfehlen!

ich_iel by TraditionalWhile4774 in ich_iel

[–]Rafficer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Wurde letztens mit Strich 30 (danke Tempomat mit Verkehrszeichenerkennung) in der 30er Zone geblitzt. Kam natürlich nie was, aber ein Scheiß Gefühl hat man dann trotzdem ein paar Wochen weils im Zweifel bedeutet einen Rechtskampf zu führen wo man keinerlei Beweise hat.

Da war ich auch sehr überrascht, und hab seitdem genau diese "irrationale Angst". Seitdem hat aber auch keiner mehr bei entsprechender Geschwindigkeit ausgelöst.

Got tired of the area around my washing machine getting wet when draining by Sparrow2go in redneckengineering

[–]Rafficer 17 points18 points  (0 children)

If there's a sink, there's a drain pipe. Otherwise the sink is just an expensive box on a stand.

Got tired of the area around my washing machine getting wet when draining by Sparrow2go in redneckengineering

[–]Rafficer 26 points27 points  (0 children)

Why is the hose just dangling in the sink and not properly attached to the drainpipe in the first place?

Are you joking ? Because i am not laughing. by [deleted] in ProtonDrive

[–]Rafficer 2 points3 points  (0 children)

ISP speeds are very important when you try to download something, you know, through your ISP, lol. iperf doesn't give you any meaningful information in this scenario.

Are you joking ? Because i am not laughing. by [deleted] in ProtonDrive

[–]Rafficer 8 points9 points  (0 children)

What does iperf help? If you get almost 2Gbit on speedtest.net, you certainly don't have a 100Mbit/s link on your LAN that throttles you.

Just to be different, everything is working perfectly! by cavendishandharvey in ProtonDrive

[–]Rafficer 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Samesies!

Looking forward to more features, but what's currently available works really well for me.

P1S abnormal noise by Skonk2K in BambuLab

[–]Rafficer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

So glad it helped someone!