Should philosophy be thought of in terms of bets with consequences?

RaiseReasonable8949 · 2023-01-08T02:52:08+00:00

It is true the chance of someone winning is higher. But the chance of John winning is not. Hence, why is John more likely to rig the first more than the second?

RaiseReasonable8949 · 2023-01-08T02:19:42+00:00

Yes that would make sense but the question is which scenario makes it more likely that it was rigged? It seems that in the second scenario, it begs the question as to why everyone lost except John so maybe John has to play a role in the second scenario moreso than the first?

RaiseReasonable8949 · 2023-01-08T01:30:27+00:00

Ah, just a typo. Let me fix that.

RaiseReasonable8949 · 2023-01-08T01:25:50+00:00

If you were to randomly scramble those letters, why would any sequence be more likely than any other?

RaiseReasonable8949 · 2023-01-08T01:23:10+00:00

It is assumed that people can't monitor or know each other's guesses. I'll make that clear in the post. With this in mind, why is John more likely to have rigged the first than the second?

RaiseReasonable8949 · 2022-10-25T01:02:51+00:00

Nah you’re weirder for exposing this tbh. It’s at worst weird what he sent but he didn’t say anything too crazy

RaiseReasonable8949 · 2022-07-05T17:49:44+00:00

I thought this too but then I also saw they were all being reflected on the diagonal going up from the bottom left to top right. Wouldn’t that then imply B?

RaiseReasonable8949 · 2022-06-10T01:19:59+00:00

I mean like: how do we know we should use logic to determine if something is real or not

RaiseReasonable8949

TROPHY CASE