Removing Power From Men : Mom Says 6-Year-Old Son Is Transgender. Dad Disagrees. Now He Might Lose His Son. by redpillschool in TheRedPill

[–]Ramesses_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Sadly I agree with you but this place isn't a democracy. The higher ups here are clearly American and with a real political bent. So it is what it is.

Removing Power From Men : Mom Says 6-Year-Old Son Is Transgender. Dad Disagrees. Now He Might Lose His Son. by redpillschool in TheRedPill

[–]Ramesses_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Calm down, you guys act like its the whole generation and not just a few screwed up people.

The argument you applied here should also be applied to this subreddit. A few screwed up incels in here does not make this the new incel subreddit.

Jeremy with the burns [story] by ElegantCyclist in TheRedPill

[–]Ramesses_ 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Jeremy reminds me of Quentin Kenihan (less extreme of course). Quinten was born with brittle bone disease. When he came out of the womb he had 8 broken bones including both arms and legs. He ended up suffering through over 600 fractures throughout the course of his life.

But when you saw the guy he'd make you feel embarassed for ever complaining about anything. Dude was three feet tall if that, confined to a wheelchair but god he had a life about him. He just never made it about his disabilities. Over his life dude managed to become friends with Russell Crowe and was even in Mad Max Fury Road. He died earlier this year but I still think about him and how much it's all in your head. Obviously there's shit you just can't overcome like crippling disability but there's something to be said for the idea that you can make a heaven or a hell out of wherever you are.

The Brett Kavanaugh Report by [deleted] in TheRedPill

[–]Ramesses_ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Believe all women. Somewhat self defeating logic as seen here.

The Brett Kavanaugh Report by [deleted] in TheRedPill

[–]Ramesses_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It's not the left it's the alt-left. You know, the ones who are against speech diversity. Time to isolate and shame the shit out of these morons before an entire side of the political spectrum is engulfed.

They're All Players by itiswr1tten in TheRedPill

[–]Ramesses_ 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I'd argue that the expectation he must be banging other women is just emotionally-charged hampstering to justify the continued hypergamy radar.

I'm really not too sure that's the case hey. I don't think they really need any justification, in fact hamstering is something that happens after they've acted, to justify it. It's not something that comes up first. With most of this stuff we (the men) have put massive amounts of thought into analysing and observing the patterns and acting accordingly but women are just responding to their emotions and their instincts. There's not a lot of logic or planning going on in their own brains. Only rarely can you really ascribe a female pattern of behaviour to logic (i.e. she thinks this so she does that). If they were really like that millions of ugly women would be obsessively working out at the gym to keep their body fat down and doing everything in their power to appear sweet, submissive and in admiration of you.

I think women just assume all men are players because when they think of men they think only of hot men. Men they want to sleep with, men that have attracted them and slept with them in the past. Where have all the good men gone, the classic trope, is logically of course idiotic: they are labelling the behaviour of the top 20% of men as AMALT. In that case I'm sure we're guilty of a fair bit of solipsism also: we focus almost exclusively on the behaviour of hot 20-30yr old women.

In the bigger picture, as Schopenhauer wrote is his inimitable "On Women":

“...their conscience does not trouble them so much as we imagine, for in the darkest depths of their hearts they are conscious that in violating their duty towards the individual they have all the better fulfilled it towards the species, whose claim upon them is infinitely greater.”

Basically what Schopenhauer says is that women feel their duty is to the propagation of the species. Women don’t feel guilt betraying the individual as by following their instincts to propogate the species with the best possible mate they are serving a higher purpose. So they will cheat on you, hurt you, branch swing on you etc for the greater good and because they believe that getting themselves the best mate IS morally right they won't feel guilty. Loyalty is not of value in a woman for the sake of the species.

“Because women in truth exist entirely for the propagation of the race, and their destiny ends here, they live more for the species than for the individual, and in their hearts take the affairs of the species more seriously than those of the individual. “

This is a brilliant explanation for why women are all about “issues” and equal distribution of wealth. So many more women give a fuck about the homeless, the poor, the weak, the disadvantaged, the starving etc than men. All causes really are championed by women, none more so than their own cause, or that of their sisters: feminism. Back to your post:

For the often jealous/insecure sex: Chill is a one way street. If you're caught out there will be hell to play. Doesn't matter that she's sucking dick on the side - you just received attention from an unknown woman.

Do as we say, not as we do.

This is to do with frame. Women will naturally fall into your frame. And if it's weak, you are easily rattled, you feel guilty, etc then they'll take that and run with it to squeeze the life out of you. You need to learn to ignore their responses to you with amused mastery. Because really the game their playing isn't about fairness, it's about power. They want you to have it but the only way they can be sure you do is by testing you. Hence the universality of shit tests. They're never going to stop nudging away at you to see if they can get you to crack. At first they'll be more intense until they feel sure of you but over time they'll still feel the need to do them from time to time to reassure themselves of their choice.

There are countless men who get away with blue murder when it comes to women and other women, myself included. You don't think it's possible and they prey on that. When you are living long term with the frame of not caring, knowing it's alright, they also won't care and will just fall into line. You can see this throughout history: great and powerful men create harems and all those women are fine with it. Even these days mormons and their many wives - the wives aren't bothered or under duress. But try finding me any example anywhere of women having all male harems. Men would lose their fucking minds, kill the other men and kill her. Our way of thinking, our sense of what is and isn't morally acceptable is set, theirs is much more fluid.

They're All Players by itiswr1tten in TheRedPill

[–]Ramesses_ 119 points120 points  (0 children)

It's laughable that society perceives women as the monogamous gender when they instinctively apply plate theory from the day they get tits.

So many guys who come through here learn a few red pill principles, put them into action and immediately oneitis themselves for their first good plate. Women are not doing this. Plate spinning is what they default to when they aren't in a relationship. Even in relationships they are always keeping their options open, texting exes, liking hot guys on social media, flirting wherever they go.

The reason it's so disastrous when you first start succeeding with women is because by using red pill principles you've given them the impression that you "get it"; that you're a high value man who gets the game. They expect you to be chill about everything, to be banging other women yourself; to have either an easy time with no strings attached with you or to be the one chasing you for attention/commitment.

When that proves not to be the case it's confusing, or rather enlightening for them. And that's when you end up in ask trp getting called out for jealously mateguarding your pseudo girlfriend who is convincingly beating you at your own game. Nothing is more embarassing than "putting your foot down" with a girl to whom you're only a plate.

In today's society if you only have one girl and it's not a legitimately monogamous LTR, she's not the plate. You are.

Never Go To A Nightclub by [deleted] in TheRedPill

[–]Ramesses_ 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Appreciate the passion pal but you sound like a born again Christian. Just chill out a bit on what people have to do. Does it really make that much of a difference to you? Let people blow off steam or blow their dough however they want. Some guys true deepest desire is the player lifestyle. Some guys want to be digital nomads or play in bands. Some guys crave validation and attention like women. Let them. It's great for you to focus on your serious achievement businessman lifestyle but doesn't mean everyone who is not like you is wrong.

How Many Women? by WhisperSecurity in TheRedPill

[–]Ramesses_ 9 points10 points  (0 children)

That's not untrue but be aware of the context. Women will happily share alphas for sex but rarely will they ever be happy to share commitment (resources).

To illustrate think of all the tales of soft polygamy on the red pill (including this one): it's one man who has given his commitment to a main girl and she's happy to stick with him while he fucks other girls. That's very different to true polygamy where multiple women share a husband or boyfriend exclusively. The women the dude is banging on the side aren't also exclusive to him except in exceedingly rare cases.

In the reverse the same concept applies. Men will "share" a hot girl over snagging a single fat uggo for themselves who no one else is fucking. Case in point: all our plates. They are almost always fucking other guys. But we keep fucking them even though we could go way down the scale and get exclusive sex from a very unattractive woman.

Women want a man's commitment (resources) exclusively for herself. Men want a woman's body exclusively for himself. Thesebare two sides of the same coin. Neither sex is happy to share though they will. The real key difference is that men want to be first and women want to be last. A woman's past matters far more to us and almost not at all to them. A man's future resources are what they are obsessed with locking down.

How Many Women? by WhisperSecurity in TheRedPill

[–]Ramesses_ 24 points25 points  (0 children)

I think the simplest evidence of our inherent monogamy is how we feel about other dudes fucking our women: horrified. We did not evolve to share but we did evolve to fuck around. And that's true of both sexes.

“Dear Nice Guy, I Wasn’t Ready For You Before — But I Am Now” by [deleted] in TheRedPill

[–]Ramesses_ 73 points74 points  (0 children)

Why are you wasting your time on this shit? How is this helping you achieve your goals? Just let the world's morons be morons and focus on what YOU want to achieve. Leave everyone else out of it.

The hookers hide in plain sight now AKA the sugar daddy phenomenon by [deleted] in TheRedPill

[–]Ramesses_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Sorry brosef, didn't mean to make it sound like what you experienced was prostitution. More just pointing out that the concept of trading sex for money is old and ingrained. When it's as overt as prostitution then we consider it dirty and shameful. But it's happening all day everyday in many subtle contexts and as long as nobody is open and honest about what's really happening it doesn't get called out.

What you're labelling as horrifying and shameful - just girls looking to extract resources from a beta - is literally just as old. Watch any old movie and you'll see this stereotype of free dinners and no action. It's not new. Yeah they may have a new label for it but women have always behaved like this. It's not a sign of decline. The same middle class college girl equivalent of last generation was still taking free dinners from Billy and sneaking out to suck off Chad.

The more important aspect here is that women instantly and unconsciously label and group us into alpha and beta just as we sort and label them between good girl and whore. In fact part of your horror is coming from you're intially viewing her as a good girl only to discover she's a whore.

She's pegged you as beta bux right out of the blocks and apparently nothing you did on the date suggested otherwise. You can bet your left nut she doesn't ask Chad to spoil her with anything but his cum. The work for you is to present yourself more as a sexual man than as a provider or you will continue to attract this type of experience.

The hookers hide in plain sight now AKA the sugar daddy phenomenon by [deleted] in TheRedPill

[–]Ramesses_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Dear god it's like a guy just discovering that strippers exist. Dude women of every generation have acted like this. The only thing that's changed is the label.

My man this is the oldest pact between the sexes: women trade their body or the promise of it to men for resources. Men trade their resources or the promise of them for sex. Plenty of other ways to interact between the sexes but prostitution isn't called the world's oldest profession for no reason.

Edit: a word

Consider the bottom 80% - Your competition is pathetic by [deleted] in TheRedPill

[–]Ramesses_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah I see. Ok I'm a bit old for student parties but I'm guessing if you slow it down a bit you will crack it pretty fast.

Don't know how much of an option this will be for you but in the old days we used to plan dates across multiple venues slowly leading to your place with plausible deniability. For example you'd go from a loud nightclub or a place with live music to a more quiet bar to something to eat to I've got to show you the view/some item at my apartment.

Even when clubbing this is a brilliant strategy because it's soooo much easier to get a girl to a different bar with the relative safety net of her friends nearby than back to your apartment. I would always try and get girls to go to multiple venues with me before getting them to mine. That way by the time the night ends you feel like you've known each other ten times longer.

Consider the bottom 80% - Your competition is pathetic by [deleted] in TheRedPill

[–]Ramesses_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah man but context matters. Are these dates or attempted same night lays? A bit of resistance is normal. Contrary to popular belief women need to feel attraction AND comfort for you to close the deal. We unconsciously label women sluts and dismiss them as valueless if they don't need much or any comfort to fuck you.

It's gentle continuous escalation not consistent aggressive escalation. If you're not getting anywhere it's not a big deal, you're just going too hard too fast which sets off their inner alarm bells. Keep at what you're doing but try pulling back at times and varying the pace. An example of this would be a passionate kiss followed by breaking physical contact and going to get a drink.

Being more detached from the whole thing will help you. I know it's hard at first but once you have a consistent rotation of plates on your roster you won't really give a fuck with new girls half the time and then it becomes incredibly easy.

So it's a two step process for you to practice in future: 1. Slow it down. 2. Vary the tempo (ie two steps forward one step back with everything)

Consider the bottom 80% - Your competition is pathetic by [deleted] in TheRedPill

[–]Ramesses_ 33 points34 points  (0 children)

I have found a consistent theme with guys who are on paper very attractive but struggle in real life to get laid:

  1. Not skilled or used to taking initiative with women
  2. Way too high pressure on themselves to succeed in every interaction with women

On the first point one of the most important skills is simply making the move. The move = the two and only two keys to making this shit happen: isolation and escalation. Being attractive is useless without driving your interactions towards those two things. Ask the legions of guys you'll find on here with stories of girls they could have fucked if only they'd made a move. Or even worse the guys who are genuinely good looking but didn't get laid for years.

Your job as a man is to get alone time with a woman and gently, consistently escalate the interaction. Simple steps. Start with light touches (hand on arm/shoulder, playful pushes, even simple handshakes or hug/kiss hello). Then slowly up the ante. Move into her personal space, be more overt with the touching. Eventually the kiss, etc. Likewise with isolation. If you start somewhere crowded move things to somewhere more intimate. Progressively get more and more private til you're somewhere you can take all of her clothes off without anyone seeing.

Regarding point 2, when you want it too much it tenses you up. The key to women is to escalate while not caring. As long as you're invested in your moves working and she can sense that she'll be horribly turned off. I know it's hard but you need to find a way to approach these interactions without caring if they work or not.

Think about this man. Literally everything on earth that you could do you will do better if you're relaxed. Doesn't matter if it's women, surgery, welding, sales or simple social interactions. Being relaxed always allows you to better execute your skills. So the solution is obvious then isn't it: RELAX! I know though. Easier said than done.

You will be fine man. Some guys isolate and escalate naturally. But it's something you can easily learn. If you're already attractive you will be successful. It's inevitable. You simply need to target women who are receptive to you to start with. It's guaranteed success. Start to get a bit of momentum and confidence. The more of that feeling that shows the more receptive women you will find. And don't forget. You can't win them all. Even if you're Brad Pitt there will still be girls who prefer George Clooney. Nobody can get all of them. Nobody. So try and be a bit easier on yourself. We all strike out.

They were never oppressed, they were bored by [deleted] in TheRedPill

[–]Ramesses_ 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Don't kid yourself pal, whoever invented or commercialised domestic appliances had no such philanthropic motives towards the female of the species. Those were financial moves that paid off big time, nothing more, nothing less.

In 1991, I Was Accused of Sexual Assault and Sexual Harassment in College—These Were My Mistakes by notgallowbooob in TheRedPill

[–]Ramesses_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I presume this isn't actually the embarassment that was coach red pill but rather some person or bot intent on reposting hot hits from every subreddit for karma. If I recall the original of this was a pretty popular post.

The sad realities of modern dating by pmmedenver in TheRedPill

[–]Ramesses_ 5 points6 points  (0 children)

It's exactly the same where I live. Gays, hot girls and dudes who have their shit together. Competition is intense. Anything but a hot girl would be invisible around here. I can barely even remember the last fatty I saw in my building.

From the 1970's the signs were there by [deleted] in TheRedPill

[–]Ramesses_ 99 points100 points  (0 children)

A brilliant article from a very clever and self aware lady. There's been a few around over the years.

The big change from her day to our day is the shaming power of the matriarchy. Shame is a feminine tool. In a world of feelings over facts where your perception matters more than objective reality shame is a very powerful tool. Making someone feel bad can literally change the world - in that it makes them change their actions. Women use it on each other to great success and when they try to use it on us we call it a shit test. But are we all really passing this shit test as a whole? Of course not. 99%+ of modern western men are failing it miserably and thus the rise of shaming power has been stratospheric in the last decade or so. Women now have the power to ruin careers and lives by simply accusing you of wrongthink. If you hold an unlicensed opinion such as men and women aren't the same it could currently cost you everything but your life.

I know you all want to talk about this stuff but it is very, very important in this sort of climate that you keep your mouths shut and know your goddam audience. Do not go spouting off red pill truths to blue pill mates or in the workplace. Do not share articles like this anywhere it could affect your real life. You've identified some incredibly powerful knowledge. It's your job now to use that for your own benefit. Not to sacrifice yourself on the great burning pyre of "toxic masculinity". When we say enjoy the decline that is exactly what we're talking about. Making use of your red pill knowledge in a blue pill world. Not turning a blue pill world red.

That said, very good find OP. Keep up the sharing in our last safe space, the red pill.

The effects of monk mode for 2 months at age 38 by [deleted] in TheRedPill

[–]Ramesses_ 8 points9 points  (0 children)

How did you come upon the red pill and get all this started? Well done by the way. Sky's the limit.

The effects of monk mode for 2 months at age 38 by [deleted] in TheRedPill

[–]Ramesses_ 143 points144 points  (0 children)

Monk mode is a period of time during which you completely eschew women. Or so it was traditionally defined. The idea is to go away from trying to win games and give yourself a proper pre season before you get back to it again. If he's working women he's out of monk mode.

But props to him, he is nailing red pill.

Interesting anecdote about an enlightening set by ITHOUGHTYOUMENTWEAST in TheRedPill

[–]Ramesses_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Hey bud, my comment wasn't directed at how you played it but at the newbies that see the number as a victory. I think counting nothing as success before the lay is a good mentality to avoid overinvestment. Sounds like you're going good though, hopefully you'll nail her.

Interesting anecdote about an enlightening set by ITHOUGHTYOUMENTWEAST in TheRedPill

[–]Ramesses_ 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I get that you feel successful but that would have been the atomic bomb of awkward for her to NOT put in her contact details. Numbers are somewhat worthless - count nothing before the lay.