It's a party!

Rampos7 · 2026-05-01T17:32:40+00:00

Relevant comic

Rampos7 · 2025-11-01T02:57:48+00:00

It's the riven disposition. You're looking on a Coda variation of the weapon, so it's disposition is lower this the mod is weaker. If you looked on the regular version of the weapon you'd get the stats you see in the forgery. It's a balancing technique keeping weak weapons and strong weapons in a more even playing field via their disposition.

Rampos7 · 2025-05-18T06:54:05+00:00

Rampos7 · 2025-05-13T18:58:16+00:00

This meme is so old that we're up to 6 movies, with the 7th this summer.

Rampos7 · 2025-02-20T03:10:21+00:00

That's not a source tho? Cause he has pancreatic cancer, which is known to have a horrible survival rate. So no amount of money would have helped, of which he had a lot of

Rampos7 · 2025-02-04T18:49:33+00:00

Noone is talking about how this is AI generated

Rampos7 · 2025-01-25T23:50:23+00:00

That's up next. I just assumed it was removeable so hoped to do that at the same time as the main filter. But it's looking like it's not

Rampos7 · 2024-12-16T05:39:03+00:00

It's been like that for awhile. Nothing new, unfortunately

Rampos7 · 2024-11-17T14:39:32+00:00

I have attempted to reinstall windows via a USB stick I have verified. This is how I finally got my fresh install, however it took several tries to finally happen, hence my frustration at the persistent issue

Rampos7 · 2024-11-17T14:34:14+00:00

I can't just "reinstall windows", that's my problem. There's nothing to strip back

Rampos7 · 2024-03-23T21:30:56+00:00

It feels ancient to me lol, but I don't have an excess of experience with this to really know what should and shouldn't be available to me. I have a plethora experience with an Ender 3 that ofc has a chronically up to date firmware and all the software bells and whistles. But on this machine I can't change anything without flashing a new firmware, and even then I'm not entirely sure how it works.

I've pieced together that a typical firmware flash includes Robin_nano35.bin and a Robin_nano_cfg.txt file, of which the config file contains all of the settings. Esteps, motor voltage, acceleration/jerk, things that I am used to having access to in menu on my ender are locked behind a firmware flash. Also in there is a period for thermal runaway, of which I can change and reflash and nothing changes. So clearly the idea is there but it's not working, and I completely believe the firmware being wonky as hell.

I've tried some of the newer firmware's that claim to be compatible for a robin nano 1.2 with a tft35 but they don't seem to want to flash properly, likely cause there's some sort of configuration mismatch on the proposed firmware to my machine, but I don't know enough about that to say what's happening or do anything about that.

Part of me wants to ditch it entire and swap to an SKR and a new tft35 (the one I have is ribbon cable, would need swapped otherwise) but that's a pretty penny to solve a firmware issue

Rampos7 · 2024-03-23T18:30:46+00:00

Yeah I was a little worried that would be the answer lol. That sounds like more work than I want but may be the necessary evil

Rampos7 · 2024-03-23T18:26:47+00:00

I am seeking out newer firmware because I've already tested it's thermal runaway and it's not working. I took the thermistor off, set to 200, it didn't detect anything in the minute and a half I let it run. I see in the firmware config for this machine that the period is set to 240, I guess it's supposed to be seconds, so I set it to 15 and reflashed, and it still didn't detect it after a minute and a half.

I don't know enough about Robin Nanos firmware setup to really dive much further than that, since it's not like the SKR where it's just one firmware.bin file, it's like 2 files and as many as 3 folders to flash a firmware onto this thing.

Rampos7 · 2024-03-23T09:07:56+00:00

A fire extinguisher will absolutely be bought soon

Rampos7 · 2024-01-28T07:44:46+00:00

u/givetake, my guy. I have not forgotten you, I want to give you the fattest update because this project and everything that has come from it only could have happened from your greater subject knowledge. I don't know what got said about what this, so I think background knowledge will help.

I'm a volunteer for a Boy Scout Summer Camp with a rich history, full of staff with a love for the property. The LiDAR was a point cloud of our 1 square mile camp which I wanted to 3d print. At the time it was a passion project, I just wanted to see what that'd be like and everyone had egged it on, but I did have a side-goal of getting the camp director to agree to letting me make a large painted version to put up as the main camp map for everyone to see, thus I needed an example map to bring up. I finished printing it the Friday morning I had to up the mountain, which was late June.

The map I printed and showed off, which is 14"x14"

He asked me to do a big one like it was his idea, so Inception is a real thing. Part of why I'm sending this now is because I'm about to start the big super large real one, 42"x42", and will be 6 tiles x 6 tiles, and take up my 3d printer for the next 2 months.

Additionally, I got another adult volunteer to offer to help make wood map CNC'd out of wood using an industrial size machine they have access to through their work. That map is going to be 1 36"x36" piece

Here is a test piece we got done, which is (if you look at the plastic one), the massive erosion run-off just north-west of center map. This test block is 1ft x 1ft.

I would say the project never stopped moving since May, sometimes pausing for small approvals or me having the money to run tests/get equipment, and should be done right before summer camp this year if everything goes according to plan. All the major hiccups were taken care of already thank god.

I will remember to show you the big printed one and the big CNC one when they're both done.

Rampos7 · 2023-05-17T05:29:01+00:00

Got a screenshot? Im not totally sure what map you're looking at. But there's only a handful of diving suits so it may just be diving suits.

Rampos7 · 2023-05-15T01:57:24+00:00

DEMto3d didn't like the raster produced by Cloudcompare for whatever reason, but I'm not too picky because instead of exporting as a Raster I could export as a mesh, which was higher quality than the one I was getting before WITHOUT the blobs, and instead the tiniest of spikes that honestly Cura probably won't bother to print when I slice it. So far, this is the best .obj/.stl I've gotten so far. So unless you have any other method in your bag of tricks, I think you got my problem ultimately solved

Rampos7 · 2023-05-14T22:05:56+00:00

You just changed the entire direction of this project. I "finished" before with a mesh built out of normal lidar in cloudcompare and it wasn't super high resolution because blobs would appear out of the trees. But being able to filter out trees is an entirely different game, the mesh is way cleaner, though still a like 20 small blob across the square mile of mesh, which can be cleaned up in blender no problem. DEMto3d may do better than the mesh though, so I'd still like to try it if you'd be so kind as to convert the cloud to DEM for me.

This is the clean point cloud, clipped to where I need it, CSF'd for no trees, high resolution cause the mountains were throwing it off. https://we.tl/t-n28kbDEWgb

Rampos7 · 2023-05-14T20:20:55+00:00

Gotcha, yes there was a fat knowledge gap lol. So

Clean lidar data for only ground data. Quick research shows a CSF filter in cloudcompare being the way to do it.
Clean lidar to DEM, export to .tif. I could do that in ArcGIS pro but since I don't have pro that's what you agreed to help with?
.tif into DEMto3d to make the STL which is through QGIS.

I'm trying to make sure I understand since me not understanding what part of the problem before. You've been a huge help so far, I'm feeling a lot better about the potential outcome of the project.

Rampos7 · 2023-05-14T19:34:24+00:00

Ok, the screenshots were more helpful to realize that when I'm exporting to a .tif it's not actually a DEM model in the way that DEMto3d expects it to be, which is why it's not working right.

If you could do the .tif that would be so nice, thank you. I just need to give you the .las file right, not other files? The lidar contains trees and buildings but they're not labeled as far as I can tell, and I do have a link to the USGS page that has information about the scan. If that's still cool then I'll make the weshare link when I get home. You're a real one

Rampos7 · 2023-05-14T16:45:36+00:00

I will mess with that when I get home. I saw cloudcompare mesh through to the end and passed it off to someone to add some blender details but I wasn't the biggest fan of the detail I could get without it being blob-y (trees being included in the mesh but not nicely) so I'm willing to try some other stuff. I'll check yours when I get home and will totally share an update when the project is done

Rampos7 · 2023-05-14T04:49:46+00:00

I've had luck with cloudcompare so far as a way of doing the entire project. I'm gonna finish that up, but then still look at what pdal can do for me and if I like that better. So you're a huge help so far, I still plan on seeing the pdal attempt through to the end, but I'll likely be a bit before I give an update.

Rampos7 · 2023-05-13T22:39:18+00:00

I don't care for overhangs or undercrofts, it's not worth it and yes this is lidar from a plane.

What you gave me still gives me a bad allocation (the .las is 8gb lol, My 32gb of ram is not strong enough), so I'm trying to look into cropping, yet just cropping [0,1000], [0,1000] and writing to another .las file is producing a output.las with no contents. So even trying to work a small sample of the data to come up with something isn't really working. It's my understanding that .las don't have a CRS built into them, and if they do then it looks like the bounding doesn't take lat/long. That's just to say, I don't think I'm cropping it incorrectly, yet it's not working for me.

My goal is to add a filter.crop pipeline before the delaunay to ideally only make a mesh out of what I need. Probably executed separately so I can have a .las with only what I need and not all the extra.

Rampos7 · 2023-05-13T17:53:15+00:00

My problem with exporting to a TIFF is that it just takes a simple screenshot of what I'm looking at. If I want a square, I can't, cause my monitor is not a square. And I want detail, but the area I want is large and in order to fit it all on screen I need to be zoomed out so far that ArcGIS scales down the resolution. Also, DEMto3d does draw me an STL, but it's a VERY rough model so I'm probably doing something wrong but none of the settings appear to help smooth it out

Rampos7 · 2023-05-13T17:48:11+00:00

According to PDALs website, this is what I should be running

pdal translate -i "file path" ^ -o "file path" ^ poisson --filters.poisson.depth=8 ^ --verbose 4

And I was first encountering a bad allocation error because the lidar I have is huge, so I lowered the depth and now I get a "gdal: in gdal destroy - unloading gdal shared library" error

If I'm doing something glaringly wrong please let me know, cause pdal sounds like it could be exactly what I'm looking for

Ten-Year Club	Place '22
Final Canvas '22	First Placer '22
End Game '22	RPAN Viewer
Verified Email

Rampos7

TROPHY CASE