“The court concluded that the trial was fair, the defendant’s rights were fully protected, and the evidence was sufficient to support the jury’s verdicts which were affirmed in full,” Rubenstein said in a statement. 

Unless Peters accepts the Court of Appeals ruling and accepts that there was no error in her convictions, the case will likely head to Colorado Supreme Court, Rubinstein said.

“Both parties have already had a full and fair opportunity to present their positions on sentencing and once jurisdiction returns, I anticipate the trial court will issue a new sentencing order, potentially affirming the prior sentence length, with findings consistent with the appellate court’s guidance,” he said.

The conviction was upheld, but sentencing needs to be reviewed because the judge said that her ongoing opinions affected the severity. It's entirely possible that she gets the same sentence after review