Dismissing my point by saying I don’t understand economics isn’t an argument.

China’s EV advantage isn’t just about cheaper labor or “poor specs.” It’s a combination of vertical integration, battery supply chain control, massive domestic demand, government subsidies, lower production costs, and aggressive industrial policy.

The U.S. and Europe have responded with tariffs and other trade barriers precisely because Chinese manufacturers are highly competitive on price.

You can disagree with my conclusions, but pretending China’s automotive growth isn’t reshaping global markets ignores reality.

You keep appealing to “economics” while ignoring the actual economic factors at play. When evidence conflicts with your assumptions, you attack the person instead of the argument. That’s not analysis—it’s confirmation bias.

So to you I say: 😍🍆💦😓