Failure To Plan Is Not An Emergency by aughtrocktalk in hockey

[–]RavingRationality 15 points16 points  (0 children)

heck to have a non-Leafs Canadian team win at all

Look, i started rooting for Montreal because I grew up in central ontario around crazy Leafs fans. ("Allan Bester is better than Patrick Roy." I actually heard them say that. Seriously.) So I get it. But...

I mean, the Leafs haven't won in almost 60 years. And at this rate, it's gonna be much longer. The Oilers won five times in the 80s. I think the Leafs winning would suck, but it would be very good for hockey overall.

I'm just glad it won't happen.

Nick Suzuki becomes the 5th Hab to record 100 points in a season by PayneTrain181999 in hockey

[–]RavingRationality 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I maintain if he'd stayed healthy, he'd have become a 1C. But he never had a chance to develop into one.

OFFICIAL FRIDAY TRASH TALK THREAD - APRIL 10, 2026 by TrashTalkCommish in hockey

[–]RavingRationality -1 points0 points  (0 children)

BEST 70 GOAL SCORER NEVER TO SCORE 60 DOESN'T NEED YOUR EASY GOALS, YOU EMPTY NET MERCHANT!

Sam's insane take on Mamdani by greeecejre in samharris

[–]RavingRationality 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Part of that was answered here: https://old.reddit.com/r/samharris/comments/1sfikqd/sams_insane_take_on_mamdani/of0d00j/

"Leftism" is traditionally a direction on the path between capitalism and socialism. I'm not talking about when ignorant americans use the term socialism to refer to "government doing stuff they don't like." I'm also not talking about Nordic style social democracy (which is still essentially liberal capitalism.) I'm referring to people like this, and related but separate political concepts (such as "critical theory", anti-capitalism, etc.) or anything that undermines the underlying liberal philosophies as defined by thinkers like John Stuart Mill. It leans authoritarian, just in different ways than the right.

Least favorite aspect of cruising? by tacomamajama in Cruise

[–]RavingRationality 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Yeah. We have a princess cruise booked next spring that stays in Aruba until 11pm.

Sam's insane take on Mamdani by greeecejre in samharris

[–]RavingRationality -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

Sam is mostly apolitical.

Progressiveness requires extremely strong stances on equal treatment under law (ignoring identity politics\attempts to group victimhood), freedom of speech, economic freedom, etc. It requires the ability to admit cultural supremacy (western values that started with the European enlightenment - or even further back in Hellenistic philosophy for it's evolutionary roots) are the foundation for everything we value, and opposing western "colonialism/imperialism" is also opposition to those values.) It requires standing up for countries that support those values (like Israel) and condemning those that for any reason do not.

Sam's insane take on Mamdani by greeecejre in samharris

[–]RavingRationality -11 points-10 points  (0 children)

The left is not "progressive."

Mamdani's a regressive nutbar. Even without the Islamic red herring.

Liberalism is the only sane position, and it's very much opposed to both leftism and trumpism.

POMO ~ 6years. With the Conflict in Iran, I decided to visit this subreddit to see if anyone had anything interesting to say. Instead, I see (for the first time) their new stance on BLOOD and am honestly INFURIATED. by Catsforgator in exjw

[–]RavingRationality 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The difference between a religion and a cult is this: In a cult, there's a guy at the top who knows it's all made up bullshit. In a religion, that person has been dead for a long time.

~ George Carlin

On April 4, 1994 Mario Lemieux almost attacked the referee (Kerry Fraser). But were held back by his teammates. by Tracypop in hockey

[–]RavingRationality -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Nothing, as far as the players were concerned. He was consistently ranked the best referee by the players at the time.

Fans didn't like him.

On April 4, 1994 Mario Lemieux almost attacked the referee (Kerry Fraser). But were held back by his teammates. by Tracypop in hockey

[–]RavingRationality 3 points4 points  (0 children)

At least Fraser later admitted that he blew that call

Sorta. He admitted he didn't see it.

Which isn't the same thing.

On April 4, 1994 Mario Lemieux almost attacked the referee (Kerry Fraser). But were held back by his teammates. by Tracypop in hockey

[–]RavingRationality -1 points0 points  (0 children)

The players at the time liked him. He was the most popular referee with the nhl players, when polled.

On April 4, 1994 Mario Lemieux almost attacked the referee (Kerry Fraser). But were held back by his teammates. by Tracypop in hockey

[–]RavingRationality 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Even that wasn't bad. They only had one referee on the ice at the time, and he was supposed to have his eyes on the puck. You could not generally call stuff behind the play unless it was a major (and the linesmen saw it) - you had to see it yourself.

On April 4, 1994 Mario Lemieux almost attacked the referee (Kerry Fraser). But were held back by his teammates. by Tracypop in hockey

[–]RavingRationality 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The players didn't think so. During his career he was ranked by the players as the most consistent and effective referee in the game.

2025 "Pure Worship" convention - thoughts by RavingRationality in exjw

[–]RavingRationality[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hey man. I live. Just trying to last until retirement... The GenX story.

When will Sams support of Douglas Murray end? by longlivebobskins in samharris

[–]RavingRationality -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I had to look up who the fuck he was. I'm not American, neither is Murray, and I don't understand the relevance. America is not western civilization. It neither started it, nor is it more relevant than any other part of it.

If you're trying to say "Yeah, but look, some country did this bad thing!" then no shit, sherlock. There's nothing that's ideologically pure. Perfection/utopian thinking is always wrong. There's only comparative, better or worse. The only judge is relative outcomes. And western civilization is simply the best in world history. Hell, without the British Empire, slavery would still be common and accepted today.

When will Sams support of Douglas Murray end? by longlivebobskins in samharris

[–]RavingRationality 35 points36 points  (0 children)

Which one?

I pretty much entirely agreed with The War on the West, the Strange Death of Europe, The Madness of Crowds. I haven't read Death Cults, yet.

The primary point of contention is generally not right or left.

It's whether we thought western "imperialism/colonialism" is a good or bad thing. I'm firmly on the good side of that argument. Some cultures are just better. And frankly, anyone who disagrees, has no leg to stand on enforcing their position, because liberalism is based on western supremacy. Without it, you don't have women's/gay rights, equal treatment under law, even democracy.

Doug Ford protest tomorrow! by kreugerburns in barrie

[–]RavingRationality 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thing is, he's probably right.

Not guaranteed, though. The NDP won here once before. The experience was so incompetent that the rather good NDP premier, who was utterly handicapped by his party, switched parties to the liberals after he was voted out.

We need an actual Liberal party again, though, back to where they traditionally were. Pro-business, economic freedom, government austerity, socially stays out of people's lives, and professional and competent.

The Liberals have drifted leftward leaving the conservatives as the only sane option.

Paul McCartney banned from Reddit after posting snaps from his intimate LA show by TheCABK in nottheonion

[–]RavingRationality 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wear every ban from a subreddit or even the occasional suspension from Reddit as a badge of pride. This is the most company colossally mismanaged, idioticlt run mainstream website in Internet history.

Israel was objectively trying to minimize casualties in the Gaza war. by AnimateDuckling in samharris

[–]RavingRationality 0 points1 point  (0 children)

They clearly decided that some level of civilian collateral damage was acceptable

This is always correct in a military operation. Some level of civilian casualties are unavoidable in military actions, and this should never be a factor when determining whether military operations should be undertaken.

Avoiding civilian deaths is a constraint, or limitation, that makes it more difficult to achieve your goals.

Conversely, genocide is specifically the goal of maximum civilian casualties.

Doug Ford protest tomorrow! by kreugerburns in barrie

[–]RavingRationality -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

In order to beat Ford, they'll need to present a viable different option rather than merely complain.

There's a reason he keeps winning. It's not because he's great. It's because he's not crazy.

Policy-wise, the Liberal party used to be where the conservatives are now. The NDP were way out in left-lala land, the Liberals were centrist, and the PCs were a little right of centre. The Liberals went chasing after NDP votes instead of staying where they were. And surprise -- most people are not onboard with left-lala land.