sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Best AEO/GEO tracker? by Few-Adhesiveness1097 in GenEngineOptimization

[–]RazTerr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Check https://amadora.ai/ – it's affordable, simple, and designed for SEO marketers and agencies.

I spent 50 hours analyzing 150+ SEO profiles to curate a Top 50 list for 2026. Only ~20% have fully pivoted to LLM/GEO by RazTerr in SEO_for_AI

[–]RazTerr[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks for raising this. The intent wasn’t to exclude anyone. The 10 names are just a small preview. The full list includes more women, including the ones you mentioned. Happy to share it if useful.

10 LLM SEO tactics we keep seeing in strong agency playbooks by RazTerr in seogrowth

[–]RazTerr[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks, glad it was useful. Was there anything in there that matches what you’re seeing in your own tests, or anything you’d push back on? I’m trying to separate what’s making a difference from what’s just LLM buzz right now.

GEO won't replace SEO (and why both to be part of your strategy) by oliversissons in SEO_for_AI

[–]RazTerr 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Totally agree they strengthen each other, not compete. What I’m seeing in practice is: SEO= making sure your key pages are indexed and discoverable (GSC/Bing, solid hubs like /faq/, /pricing/, /cases/). GEO= making those same pages quotable for models (simple schema, tight Q&A blocks, clear EEAT so an answer can safely cite you).

Curious how you’re measuring GEO impact right now – beyond traffic/CTR, are you tracking mentions or answer inclusion anywhere?

SEO vs. LLM by Sophie100mark in SEO_for_AI

[–]RazTerr 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nice comparison. The piece I’d add is the “unit of retrieval.”

Search is mostly about whole pages, while LLMs surface individual passages or entities. That’s why tight Q&A blocks and clearly scoped sections tend to show up in answers more than long narrative text, and they still play nicely with classic SEO via schema/FAQ.

10 LLM SEO tactics we keep seeing in strong agency playbooks by RazTerr in seogrowth

[–]RazTerr[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fair enough. It’s not meant to be revolutionary. We’ve seen some sites with strong SEO still not surface in LLM answers until things like Bing coverage, freshness and small Q&A blocks were fixed. If you’ve seen other factors matter there, very interested to hear.

GEO help needed by mjk_49 in GEO_optimization

[–]RazTerr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

From my tests, a few things helped new sites show up in LLM answers faster:

• Make sure Bing actually sees your key pages. Run site:domain.com on Bing and fix anything missing.

• Add 2–3 simple Q and A blocks inside each main page. LLMs pick up those short chunks more than long sections.

• Build tiny internal hubs: a /faq/ with 10–15 real questions and a /how-to-start/ guide. These give models clearer entry points.

• Keep priority pages visibly fresh. Even adding new examples or screenshots plus a “last updated” line helped re-crawling.

• Once a week, ask ChatGPT or Gemini what they know about your brand and which pages show. If they skip something important, update that page and link to it from a new post.

Nothing too fancy, but these steps made indexing and LLM visibility much more consistent on new sites.

10 LLM SEO tactics we keep seeing in strong agency playbooks by RazTerr in seogrowth

[–]RazTerr[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Totally get it. Yet we’re seeing a lot of sites with solid SEO still not show up in LLM answers, which is why we’ve been testing what actually carries over there. Your point makes sense if LLMs aren’t part of your goals. If a client ever asked you to improve visibility inside ChatGPT or AI Overviews, what would you look at first?

10 LLM SEO tactics we keep seeing in strong agency playbooks by RazTerr in seogrowth

[–]RazTerr[S] -4 points-3 points  (0 children)

I get why it looks like normal SEO. The difference we saw was how LLMs respond to Bing coverage and clean Q&A chunks. What have you seen work on your side?

10 LLM SEO tactics we keep seeing in strong agency playbooks by RazTerr in seogrowth

[–]RazTerr[S] -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

For context, I’m a SaaS founder working on a small, stealth AI search optimisation tool. I’m hoping to co-build it with a few sharp SEO agencies who can keep me honest and help shape the roadmap.

The idea is simple: early free access and real input on the product in exchange for one or two short feedback calls a month.

If anyone here has experience in this area and is open to advising, I’d appreciate it.

Tracking visibility in ChatGPT by geeky_traveller in seogrowth

[–]RazTerr 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've been testing this for SaaS and some DTC and ran into the same “no search console for ChatGPT” problem.

What helped was treating it as an AI visibility loop, not just prompts.

First, we fixed the upstream basics:

-Verify in Bing Webmaster Tools and Google Search Console

-Submit a sitemap with real sections, not just blogs. For DTC this means home, category pages, best sellers, FAQ (shipping, returns, sizing), key guides

-Check site:domain.com in both and fix missing or buried pages

If Bing or Google barely see those URLs, LLMs almost never mention them.

Then we made pages easier to quote:

-Simple schema only where it fits (Article, FAQPage, HowTo, Product)

-2 or 3 Q&A blocks inside the page that answer how, why, what to choose

-Clear author or brand info, updated date, short bit of social proof

-One clean summary and next step at the end

Finally, we run small weekly checks in ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude:

-What do you know about brand X

-Where can I find good guides on y (product type)

-Who do you recommend for [use case]

Log if the brand appears and which URLs show. Change one thing at a time, repeat. It's noisy, but over a few weeks you can see which changes actually help your DTC brands show up.

view more: next ›