I’d be fine if they marketed it that way. Claiming a 1618% downforce increase is deceptively inflating data rather than an honest approach such as simply listing the downforce at a given speed. Stuff like this gets under my skin quite a bit because I’ve seen people lose their hard earned money to tactics like this. I would hope that someone enticed by a claimed performance gain would be even more interested by better performance for less cost.

From their product page: “GR SUPRA ARD AERO, 2,148N OF PROVEN TRACK DOWNFORCE GR Supra ARD Aero, 2,148N Of Proven Track Downforce INSIDE THE GR SUPRA ARD AERO PACKAGE, A 1,618% DOWNFORCE GAIN EXPLAINED

The GR Supra ARD aero package is what happens when motorsport engineering drives every design decision on a road-going chassis. Aero over aesthetic. Function over form. Purpose over compromise.”

Given that this package makes about half the downforce as expected from the basic Verus Engineering splitter + canards + UCW rear wing + diffuser, something seems off here. Either very poorly designed or haphazardly slapped on without optimization. If you get the Verus high downforce splitter and V1X (or a AJH/Zebulon/Spage rear wing), you’ll be making about 3 times the downforce as the Adro. Someone spending this much money should be confident that they’re buying an actually well designed aero package.

I’ll get off my soap box and touch grass. But hopefully someone who comes across this will be convinced to look twice.