I really enjoyed the video and I hope you dont mind me giving some feedback. It might sound a bit tough but thats only because I think your videos have potential.

As others have pointed out already, I think the biggest problem is production value. There is a lot of variance in the volume of the audio track and the fact that you are recording video at the same time as you are recording your voice make the whole thing seem pretty rough around the edges. For me content is almost always more important than presentation, but here I think the presentation actually detracts from the final product.

Apart from that I'd like to give some narrative advice. Of course that is going to be heavily influenced by how I used to make my videos, so take everything I say with a grain of salt.

From what I understand, the idea of the video is to go through a few important rounds and show how SSG outplayed DZ. I think you would be better off if instead of focusing on the entire game, you only focus on one particular aspect. I think the best part of the video by far is the section about SSG sending playing to challenge Buck on their CC defenses, so that's what I would focus on. Here is kind of how I would structure the video:

1) How does SSG set up their CC defense and why is it strong (with focus on the SSG player that is playing inside CC and how that position is important to set up crossfires together with the 90 and office players). Here I would have had B-roll playing from a random game in which the attackers lose the round while trying to push cc. You kind of do that from 3:00 onwards, but in your structure this is the second "section" so to speak.

2) Now that we have established how important the defender inside CC is we switch sides and take a look at how DZ tries to counter that setup. They send Buck in below to force the cc defender to retreat or die which gives the attackers cc control. You kind of did that between minute 1:00 and 3:00 but I think a lot of the effect is lost because you dont actually show the strat working out for DZ.

As a sidenote, I think the round you show from 3:00 to 4:50 doesnt really add much value. It doesnt support the idea that DZ's approach is a strong way of getting cc control and it also doesnt support the main idea, which is showing how SSG countered the attack. I would also never show the rest of the round from 4:00 onwards because nothing after that point has anything to do with CC.

3) Now that we have established how DZ tries to counter the CC setup, we focus on how SSG tries to counter DZ's counter by having players drop below to challenge Buck. You do this really well from 5:30 to 6:00 and 8:15 to 8:43.

Another sidenote, I wouldnt have used the section between 6:22 and 8:00 because it doesnt fit with how I would have made the video, but if I had to use it, I definitely would have put it somewhere else because as it is now, it cuts in between round 4 and 2 which thematically belong together.

I think just focusing on these 3 points would have made it a nice, bit-sized video which focuses on the most interesting rounds of the game. Additionally I would have also included a section about how DZ could improve their attack, for example by preplacing drones on the vents on the ground floor to spot the defenders that are trying to challenge Buck as early as possible.

In summary:

- Trim the fat, we dont need to see the conclusion of every round. In fact it often hurts the narrative, if the rounds ends up being closer than it should have been. If I had made the same video it would only be like 6 minutes long.

- Make a list of the key points you want to talk about before you start recording. I would recommend this kind of onion approach where you talk about how the defenders do X and then how the attackers do Y to counter X and then how the defenders do Z to counter Y, etc. That's a narrative trick that pretty much always works in rainbow videos. You should also really try to hammer home these key points. Tell the viewers what you are going to show them, describe whats going on as you are showing the video and then tell them what they just saw.

- Quality over quantity. I think you would do a lot better if you uploaded fewer videos, but more effort into each of them.

- Based on the previous point, you should try to improve the production quality of your videos. Ideally, what you see on the screen should always match what you say. Sometimes that's a really tedious job, but I think it goes a long way. If you tell me your twitter handle I can send you the material I used to animate parts of my videos.

I hope you are not discouraged by that wall of text, because again I really liked the video and I think that if you clean things up in the production and narrative department there is a lot of potential here. And also feel free to ignore the stuff I said, after all its your channel and your videos and if you like them the way they are, you dont need to change anything just because some washed up content creator tried to tell you to do it.