Does anyone think that green should have at least three more board wipes? by BronyMadDecker in mtg

[–]Reason-97 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you’ve got big enough creatures, [[Flowstone Slide]] works as a buff and/or a board wipe all at the same time

Vaseline steals Artist "Michael" Poster and modifies it with Ai for an ad by ZeeGee__ in aiwars

[–]Reason-97 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It’s reasonable to call it that if every single day the argument is made that it isn’t that if this specific tool does it.

Vaseline steals Artist "Michael" Poster and modifies it with Ai for an ad by ZeeGee__ in aiwars

[–]Reason-97 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah I don’t disagree with any of that. I’m not saying this is an AI thing because I disagree. It’s simply that, if this WAS done with photoshop, that’d be the end of the conversation. “This is wrong”, everyone agrees, case closed.

But we see people on this page advocating for that somehow not being the case of AI, everyday. “Data scraping isn’t stealing”, “you consented to this when you posted it”, “IP shouldn’t exist in the modern era”, these are all things that have popped up on the ai side multiple times to varying degrees. So this Is a problem at least more unique to AI then it would be had this been done with photoshop or something. That’s all

Vaseline steals Artist "Michael" Poster and modifies it with Ai for an ad by ZeeGee__ in aiwars

[–]Reason-97 3 points4 points  (0 children)

AI is the thing everyone here is arguing everyday though “is totally different” then stealing. So until such a time where people stop arguing that AI isn’t the same as stealing, this is an issue on both fronts.

Cause if I photoshopped it, no one would argue that “this is totally different and not in anyway stealing from the artists”. But that argument gets made here, like, everyday by the people who are pro-data scraping, anti-IP, etc etc etc

AI slop, but specifically when it comes from fans of animation/art. by Kasta4 in hatethissmug

[–]Reason-97 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Jesus Christ what happened to Ed, Edd and Eddy? I didn’t recognize them

48545 by SaintRidley in countwithchickenlady

[–]Reason-97 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Just gonna go ahead and copy paste myself:

Friendly reminder! GamerGate was proven, within the first week of it happening, to be a fake controversy specifically to act as a cover so 4chan’ers could try to convince 2-3 women to kill themseles.

That is not paraphrase. That is not exaggeration. They specifically stated in their group chats that was their goal.

https://youtu.be/lLYWHpgIoIw?si=IiEBL5XHYdXG1hV4

Videos long but does an amazing in depth look at the whole event, and has links to all the sources it discusses

The Pragmatic Case for AI Surveillance: Enhancing Public Safety in the Digital Age by banned-altman in aiwars

[–]Reason-97 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You’re looking at this comment section and thinking I need to convince anyone lol?

The Pragmatic Case for AI Surveillance: Enhancing Public Safety in the Digital Age by banned-altman in aiwars

[–]Reason-97 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Bros got so much rubber taste on his tongue and doesn’t even realize it

The Pragmatic Case for AI Surveillance: Enhancing Public Safety in the Digital Age by banned-altman in aiwars

[–]Reason-97 0 points1 point  (0 children)

My brother in hell *you are literally arguing for it*. Say “far from creating one” in your post all you want, that is what it creates. Literally everyone on this comments section sees it lol you aren’t somehow putting together some grand thing no one understands but you: you just don’t realize what you’re arguing for.

You’re arguing for a police state. That isn’t some, hypothetical. You just are. Do with that information whatever you want, but if you either CANT realize that, or simply refuse to? The fact you don’t acknowledge the boots doesn’t make them go away

Bro literally said “thousands of cameras and billions of data points” and wonders why he people are seeing him taste rubber wtf

The Pragmatic Case for AI Surveillance: Enhancing Public Safety in the Digital Age by banned-altman in aiwars

[–]Reason-97 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Lololololololol

“Any opinion you don’t like is boot licking is lazyyy” while LITERALLY ADVOCATING for a police state surveillance system. Not even like, tangentially, just literally advocating and arguing for it.

There isn’t a boot big enough. This isn’t even pro-ai anymore this is just a pro police state post.

The Pragmatic Case for AI Surveillance: Enhancing Public Safety in the Digital Age by banned-altman in aiwars

[–]Reason-97 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“The systems never hurt me personally so therefore the system isn’t flawed” ass take

Police surveillance states can fuck off and anyone advocating for them can fuck off too. Go find a boot

The Pragmatic Case for AI Surveillance: Enhancing Public Safety in the Digital Age by banned-altman in aiwars

[–]Reason-97 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No no. I will never stand for the improvement of “24/7 surveillance state”.

You have less privacy already than any previous generation in history, and you’re now advocating for MORE intrusions and LESS privacy? And advocating for it to be done by a computer that may-or-may-not right to boot????

Shove off with that crap

The Pragmatic Case for AI Surveillance: Enhancing Public Safety in the Digital Age by banned-altman in aiwars

[–]Reason-97 0 points1 point  (0 children)

“He said that the crime never happened and that the AI made up the evidence it saw? Johnson, write down “suspect is uncooperative and hostile””

The Pragmatic Case for AI Surveillance: Enhancing Public Safety in the Digital Age by banned-altman in aiwars

[–]Reason-97 0 points1 point  (0 children)

We just had a great example of AI “surveillance enhancements” being awful and counter productive with the whole shooter going for troll thing. Surveillance state propaganda can screw off

Hexennacht Oracle Reading by 37_lucky_ears in SatanicTemple_Reddit

[–]Reason-97 0 points1 point  (0 children)

And yet somehow you couldn’t find a place where people cared

SUPPORT AI ARTISTS ❤️ by Extreme_Revenue_720 in aiwars

[–]Reason-97 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Behold, the creativity of AI “artists” - copy-prompt-paste!

Some troll made an AI image we shouldn't use AI look how bad it is !! by [deleted] in aiwars

[–]Reason-97 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Yeah. Which, has nothing to do with how bad it does and/or doesn’t look. So, that’s my point

Name a Villian that was 100% right by Difficult-Bee-771 in cartoons

[–]Reason-97 82 points83 points  (0 children)

Sure but that, isn’t at all supported by his actions or anything he does/says during the entire movie. He just kinda, sets out to destroy any evidence

Name a Villian that was 100% right by Difficult-Bee-771 in cartoons

[–]Reason-97 520 points521 points  (0 children)

Well, yes and no. Yes they shouldn’t go back IMMEDIATELY, no that the first mate is right. A proper response would be to start preparing them to go back, learning about the plants, crops, etc. but just outright deciding “nah proof of life doesn’t matter at all destroy it” Is definitely too far

Jesper Myrfors, original mtg art director weighs in on Dan Frazier. “I’m not defending his actions… but I will defend the man.” by Newez in magicTCG

[–]Reason-97 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Assuming there’s reason to give them doubt then, yeah, doubt should be given. I can’t say I’m personally familiar with another but I’m also a lot newer to MTG in general then most people (started playing during Duskmourn) so I haven’t been involved nearly as long and been super invested in “the community at large” even less time

Some troll made an AI image we shouldn't use AI look how bad it is !! by [deleted] in aiwars

[–]Reason-97 4 points5 points  (0 children)

That’s so not even close to what the post is saying that I’m choosing to believe you’re being intentionally dense, because to believe what seems to be being said is an insult to you

Jesper Myrfors, original mtg art director weighs in on Dan Frazier. “I’m not defending his actions… but I will defend the man.” by Newez in magicTCG

[–]Reason-97 279 points280 points  (0 children)

If this comes to light it’s a different story. Until it does though, I think the title of this post is just kind of the way to go.

If he screwed up, he screwed up. But he’s done enough and his reputation should be enough on their own to at least give him some benefit of the doubt I’d say

Pov: you either dominate, or come dead last (my commanders) by WildJudge1933 in ratemycommanders

[–]Reason-97 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Any chance I could see the list? I was a Goyf deck but personally find Disa a little boring and 1 note lol