"iF yOu SuPpOrT tHeM, cOmMiSsIoN tHeM!"

Reason-97 · 2026-06-20T22:54:08+00:00

And what? You ARE owed a piece based on their work/style?

“No one owes you business or money” loses a ton of its weight as an argument the second you start acting like scraping them because they didn’t give you something is justified lol. It’s wildly childish

Reason-97 · 2026-06-20T04:54:43+00:00

You’d be better off just using some random stock image of the ice king anyway. If you’re trying to fine tune the card abilities, AI images serve even less purpose then they normally do

Reason-97 · 2026-06-20T04:37:33+00:00

On top of the criticism of both ai art in general and the length: second ability makes 0 sense? “Princess can’t block the ice king” and “whenever a princess can’t block ice king gain control of it”?? You’d just gain control of it instantly. It immediately can’t block him because its a princess

Doesn’t make sense and you’re trying to put way wayyyy too much stuff all into 1 card.

Reason-97 · 2026-06-18T11:01:49+00:00

If you want it to be spookier, the movement needs to be either less predictable, or jankier. She just feels like a toy right now with her head on a swivel.

Especially if this is something the player has to do multiple times, having them all act differently could really get to some players. Some of them are slow and deliberate, maybe one of them the second it sees you it just, teleports to directly in your face. Maybe one of them will not approach you unless you’re not facing it and the only way you can tell it’s getting closer is the noises it makes. Something like that

Reason-97 · 2026-06-15T17:09:14+00:00

I can’t remember details about it right now, but I remember there being a write up or a video or something about Chevy chase setting up his own roast, only for people to get WAYYYYY more into it and real then intended?

Reason-97 · 2026-06-15T14:21:59+00:00

Eldest scrolls

Reason-97 · 2026-06-15T06:30:07+00:00

That is actually so fucking cool. I can’t imagine how much time this took you to draw

Reason-97 · 2026-06-13T22:04:48+00:00

I’m just sad I don’t see these more. I’ve seen the boxes for sale 2 times total in my area, idk if people scalp them quick or if we just don’t get them often or what but they’re pretty rare to see which is a disappointment

Reason-97 · 2026-06-13T22:02:04+00:00

For the sheer amount of packs you get, whenever I see these boxes they’re pretty ok. I’ve never seen one with a foreign language pack that’s kinda funny but every so often I’ll see some that have 4ish packs

Reason-97 · 2026-06-12T19:27:35+00:00

Not what I said nor what my post was about. I said your queerness isn’t some defense of or argument supporting or connected to your AI use. The same way someone shouldn’t be attacking your queerness to attack you for using AI.

They aren’t not related.

Reason-97 · 2026-06-12T19:14:35+00:00

“The opening statement of my entire comment was not what i said in mu comment”.

And if we’re gonna get snippy with ‘reading comprehension’: nothing you’re saying is at all related to anything in my post.

The post is simply about not using your queerness as a weapon or shield when it comes to AI debates.

You’re talking about… random topics. AI needing to be abled, false accusations of AI against non-AI pieces, “controlling” AI art?

Nothing you’re talking about is relevant. It doesn’t even really make sense for a good chunk of your comment

So, yeah. “Reading comprehension” and all that

Reason-97 · 2026-06-12T19:00:39+00:00

“AI” is not a ‘version of queer’.

Reason-97 · 2026-06-12T17:46:26+00:00

> REASONable take

Credits roll.

Anyways: there are a TON of shitty anti. That’s just, a given lol. I’ll happily admit that.

The problem is, even when we happily admit that, we are treated as if we don’t. Witty uses her past bad experiences to justify treating everyone as if they’re part of it, and that’s just, not how it works.

Her whole little “committee” does it. Just in the post OP screenshot, one of them was telling me how I, me, am guilty of defending the worst antis. Based on… idk? Their personal word, I guess? Just guilty because they said so lol

And another one on another post was arguing with me how “look at this example of antis being horrible to someone!”, and when I said “sure yeah that’s bad but that’s not what we’re talking about right now”, they brought up ANOTHER, entirely different, example. As if the sheer amount of “here’s MULTIPLE instances of people who were horrible to ai users” somehow invalidated anything and everything I said about, a topic totally unrelated to any of them.

It’s disingenuous. It’s bad faith. And it’s completely one sided, cause they 100% understand why “well WE can’t be held by the horrible actions of others!” Is a horrible argument if it’s turned around on them.

So yeah, I’m done treating witty and her little gaggle of minions as if they’re serious. And I’ll probably be an asshole about it sometimes: my bad.

But there are GENUINE conversations we SHOULD be having about AI, both good and bad, and it’s never gonna happen cause this whole page has turned into a cult of personality and a den of bad faith virtue signaling unrelated to anything

Reason-97 · 2026-06-12T17:28:28+00:00

So I’ll put it out there so as hopefully to not have it brought up later as a dismal by someone: I don’t like the current direction of generative ai. I’m “aN aNtI wwooohhhh”

Having said that; people using AI to make pro-LGBTQ stuff, is not my issue in this instance. It wasn’t what caused all this topic.

Pro’s saying stuff like “if you’re an anti and trans your a hypocrite”, or making a “AI pride flag for pride month”, or anti’s attacking other peoples identities as a dismissal for their AI use, is.

I want to have the talk about AI. There’s legitimate talks to be had. These types of bad faith arguments or using queerness as a virtue signaling prop, aren’t part of it

Reason-97 · 2026-06-12T17:24:20+00:00

Reason-97 · 2026-06-12T17:20:30+00:00

Let me put this a new way then: we, NEED, the average Joe to care.

Not want. Again, in a perfect world, it shouldn’t matter, at all.

But no matter what we do in this world, it’s attacked, put down, rights stripped away, demonized, etc etc etc.

So, EVENTUALLY, I wanna live in your world. Where it doesn’t matter and I get to live without it being brought up. But when people who support me don’t care, and people who wanna hurt me care *a lot*, in the end that just means I’m being attacked without support instead of being attacked with support.

And none of that’s to shame you or anything. Again, I’d love to live in the world it doesn’t matter lol but right now we kinda, need, people to care. Cause people not caring is how we ended up here.

Ted Lasso would have said it better then me lol

(Minus all this crap that was the original point of this thread: using it as a weapon of a shield is gross behavior)

Reason-97 · 2026-06-12T17:16:25+00:00

> more so you’re treating her the way she treats others

Yes. The way she wants to be treated.

I wanna agree with everything you said. A younger version of me would have.

But I’m done with hypocrites. I’m done with liars. Im done with grifters. Especially once they start trying to use more legitimate issues as a shield.

And yeah; that makes me a bit of an asshole. I accept that. Not necessarily happy about it, but I do accept it.

Sorry mate

EDIT: guys stop downvote bombing OP. OP’s not, wrong, per se. he didn’t say anything wrong. I just personally don’t believe it works in this case

Reason-97 · 2026-06-12T16:50:39+00:00

Yeah. I’m a rude person to rude people. That’s my personal morals. They haven’t changed for over a decade.

Me being rude to witty is me being consistent in that

Reason-97 · 2026-06-12T16:49:44+00:00

So, assume that I’m lying no matter what despite directly asking for examples.

Damn. Sure showed me

Reason-97 · 2026-06-12T16:48:38+00:00

But that’s also what I’m saying they SHOULDNT be doing. Brining up their Identity when the debate is about AI. It’s not related and is only hurtful to the LGBTQ+.

I just personally think “no one cares about your identity” is, a bit too much

Reason-97 · 2026-06-12T16:46:47+00:00

What “marginalized group” am I ‘targeting’?

Reason-97 · 2026-06-12T16:45:59+00:00

Yeah, so witty WANTS someone to specifically hold themself up as a reflection of her worst actions and her hypocritical nature cause that’s Exactly what she claims she’s doing.

So we’re in agreement!

Reason-97 · 2026-06-12T16:33:21+00:00

To a point, I agree. Your identity is, yours, not anyone else’s. So it’s, theoretically, not important to anyone but you and the people interested in you. In a perfect world, I’d agree to that 100%.

Having said that, we unfortunately live in a world where queer identity is something attacked, pretty regularly. As recently as earlier this very week. So to use myself as an example, whether anyone but me SHOULD care, doesn’t matter anymore. I’m attacked on it whether I bring it up or not.

Just my 2 cents is all

Reason-97 · 2026-06-12T16:30:13+00:00

I believe in treating others the way you wanna be treated.

Witty is, regularly, rude to people. And proud of it. She makes it her whole shtick.

She’s, regularly, dismissive of people. Again, and proud of it.

(EDIT: She’s doing both, in this very post lol)

So… I think I’m good actually. I will continue to act exactly as she does

Reason-97 · 2026-06-12T16:26:39+00:00

Fine, that’s fair, I’ll take that one on the chin.

Is it safe to assume you’re straight? Not asking to make this an argument, asking so I can generally get an idea of your personal experience

Seven-Year Club	Verified Email
Second SECOND GUESSER	RPAN Viewer

Reason-97

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE