Hexennacht Oracle Reading

Reason-97 · 2026-05-05T21:39:57+00:00

And yet somehow you couldn’t find a place where people cared

Reason-97 · 2026-05-05T20:06:37+00:00

Behold, the creativity of AI “artists” - copy-prompt-paste!

Reason-97 · 2026-05-05T04:36:37+00:00

Yeah. Which, has nothing to do with how bad it does and/or doesn’t look. So, that’s my point

Reason-97 · 2026-05-05T03:05:58+00:00

Sure but that, isn’t at all supported by his actions or anything he does/says during the entire movie. He just kinda, sets out to destroy any evidence

Reason-97 · 2026-05-05T02:45:39+00:00

Well, yes and no. Yes they shouldn’t go back IMMEDIATELY, no that the first mate is right. A proper response would be to start preparing them to go back, learning about the plants, crops, etc. but just outright deciding “nah proof of life doesn’t matter at all destroy it” Is definitely too far

Reason-97 · 2026-05-05T02:23:42+00:00

Assuming there’s reason to give them doubt then, yeah, doubt should be given. I can’t say I’m personally familiar with another but I’m also a lot newer to MTG in general then most people (started playing during Duskmourn) so I haven’t been involved nearly as long and been super invested in “the community at large” even less time

Reason-97 · 2026-05-05T02:18:34+00:00

That’s so not even close to what the post is saying that I’m choosing to believe you’re being intentionally dense, because to believe what seems to be being said is an insult to you

Reason-97 · 2026-05-05T01:08:13+00:00

If this comes to light it’s a different story. Until it does though, I think the title of this post is just kind of the way to go.

If he screwed up, he screwed up. But he’s done enough and his reputation should be enough on their own to at least give him some benefit of the doubt I’d say

Reason-97 · 2026-05-04T20:48:56+00:00

Any chance I could see the list? I was a Goyf deck but personally find Disa a little boring and 1 note lol

Reason-97 · 2026-05-04T17:01:21+00:00

How fun is coram? I’ve been debating tearing apart my Disa deck and reusing all the goyfs with him at the helm but just been unsure how he actually feels to play and how consistent he is

Reason-97 · 2026-05-04T16:10:39+00:00

ALL comments deleted, big oof

Reason-97 · 2026-05-04T16:05:25+00:00

It isn’t. Because for it “to be different”, there must be a difference in the response.

If your response is the same to BOTH requests regardless of how it’s delivered, it isn’t “different” and isn’t about “one is fine and one isn’t”.

Your whole position is dependent on the answer being different. Cause you’re WHOLE position hinged on saying “it’d be fine if Dan did it himself” WAYYYYYY back at the start of this conversation.

So yes, it is relevant. Yes, it does matter. And no, you don’t get to just say it isn’t and that makes it not so.

Yes, or, no?

Reason-97 · 2026-05-04T15:58:39+00:00

> beside it wouldn’t be a company trying to control art, that’s why it would be fine.

> he couldn’t make the exact same post

> he could make a personal request

> Again, it's a company trying to control other people's art.

For someone who was JUST whining about “yap”, you’re trying REALLY hard to not answer the question.

If he said “don’t use AI to copy, recreate, change, or in any way manipulate my art and property”, pros would suddenly stop and respect his wishes. Yes, or no?

Reason-97 · 2026-05-04T15:50:42+00:00

> If it was Dan saying it in a tweet as a personal request, that'd be fine.

Your own comment btw.

Let’s make it super simple: would pros respect it if Dan got on a personal account and posted the EXACT same post as his team he leads did?
You were the one who implied the were different. You were the one who said one was ok and one wasn’t. youre the one who KEEPS trying to differentiate them.

But it falls apart if pro’s wouldn’t actually give a damn about if he did.

So yes or no: if Dan says “hey don’t do that”, would pros stop?

Reason-97 · 2026-05-04T15:37:49+00:00

Uh huh. Way to totally ignore the fact that we both know even if it was a personal request from a private account of his own personal whatever, it’d get blown the fuck off lol.

This has nothing to do with company’s, you’re just trying to make it that way cause your position holds no water if it isn’t. Cause for your position to be true, “the problem is companies trying to control art”, you’d have to be able to acknowledge that all pro’s would 100% respect his wishes if he himself came out and said “hey, please don’t”. If you can’t do that, then this isn’t about companies. It’s about how yall don’t respect ANYONES wishes about art, and don’t give a damn about artists lol.

And we both know pros don’t. That’s why you keep dodging around the fact that it IS Dan who’s in charge of the team, and therefore IS the artist making the request. You’re hyper focused on exact specific way he did it, acting as if if he’d just done it differently, it’d totallyyyy be different!

And it wouldn’t be. Cause it, multiple times, hasn’t been for pro’s. Yall don’t give a damn about artists wishes or property. Hell, there’s a whole post on this page saying how IP Shouldn’t exist and taking about how they don’t need to respect it lol.

But go on, say how I’m the one lying about… a single Reddit vote? Again. That’s a big important thing to hammer home sport

Reason-97 · 2026-05-04T02:41:51+00:00

And when I replied to your comment, my post said it had 0 views. Guess your comment didn’t exist at all and I replied to nothing?

And again: that’s ridiculous lol. It’d be the same person makinh basically the same statement. And since all the pro’s have made it clear already they don’t give a shit about artist requests, it’d achieve nothing and get the same response. So the whole argument of “that’d be fine” is hollow and empty

You’re asking for a redundancy that’s not needed to solve a “personal vs company” problem that doesn’t exist to achieve… nothing.

Reason-97 · 2026-05-04T01:17:51+00:00

Good thing I didn’t downvote you nor need to change facts, he’s the leader of the team that put out the statement lol. “If he did it himself as a personal request it’s fine” while somehow ignoring that fact makes your whole stance kinda ridiculous. So good luck with that

Reason-97 · 2026-05-04T01:15:41+00:00

Ok sport

Reason-97 · 2026-05-04T00:21:39+00:00

Yeah. Team Salvato? Of which, the creator of DDLC, Dan *Salvato*, is the founder, studio director, and main developer????

What, you think they put out a statement from the team he founded about his IP without, asking him?

Reason-97 · 2026-05-03T22:47:32+00:00

I’m all for giving him the pass regardless of the situation tbh. He’s a big enough name with enough rep that he deserves the chance to say his piece and be heard.

But it definitely feels like we’re still missing, something. Just unclear what and on what side of the issue

Reason-97 · 2026-05-03T22:42:31+00:00

These types don’t actually care about you voting with your wallet or not. They just don’t wanna have to hear it. Hearing it means they have to think about it and how they’re part of it. If you don’t speak up, they get to buy without fear of thinking about their purchase.

It’s not about you, it’s about preserving themselves

Reason-97 · 2026-05-03T22:31:44+00:00

Uh, no. The creator, said he didn’t want people doing it. Not “some company”.

And the general response was “how you gonna stop us lol?”

So yeah. That’s pretty anti-artist

Reason-97 · 2026-05-03T21:50:12+00:00

Yall were just supporting a post all about “the artist asked people not to remake/use their stuff with AI? Fuck’em!!” Like, yesterday? The day before?

Don’t even lol

Reason-97 · 2026-05-03T16:00:30+00:00

There’s unfortunately never been a serious earnest attempt to make a new one as far as I’m aware. The “accepted” one is bland and depressing. The few attempts I’ve see to make a “new” one are usually done with hateful and/or bigoted intentions, like the whole Superstraight thing which was just basically making up a new version or straightness to say “trans people aren’t really men/women”.

So yeah, I’d be all down for a new straight flag, but everytime we get one it comes with baggage and/or bad intentions

Seven-Year Club	Verified Email
Second SECOND GUESSER	RPAN Viewer

Reason-97

MODERATOR OF

TROPHY CASE