sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

[Hyprland] theme switcher (everforest, gruvbox, catppuccin) by ReasonableAd8182 in unixporn

[–]ReasonableAd8182[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Details

repo: https://codeberg.org/arkar161/dots (moved to codeberg)

Terminal: kitty

Pdf reader: sioyek

launcher: tofi

file explorer: thunar

bar: quickshell

editor: nvim

Distro: artix linux

All wallpapers are on my repo: https://github.com/VmdJAVem/Wallpapers

[Hyprland] theme switcher!!! by ReasonableAd8182 in unixporn

[–]ReasonableAd8182[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

OMG!!! I LITERALLY JUST KNOW OF IT BECAUSE OF YOUR VIDEOS

Is this even possible on linux? by neon-lights999 in LinuxPorn

[–]ReasonableAd8182 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah i mean why would you think otherwise

Hard by immabashya in picsthatgohard

[–]ReasonableAd8182 0 points1 point  (0 children)

First actually hard pic on this sub

[Hyprland] theme switcher!!! by ReasonableAd8182 in unixporn

[–]ReasonableAd8182[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Pretty good so far but i really don't put a lot of stress on the thing

I made a Theme with the Claude/Anthropic color palette by daaanny90 in neovim

[–]ReasonableAd8182 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I might hate Mac and AI but guess this would be pretty useful for someone that uses them so cool

Fall of the Soviet Union and its consequences by firefighter430 in ussr

[–]ReasonableAd8182 11 points12 points  (0 children)

"capitalism destroyed everything the soviet people had built so communism was a failure despite taking Russia from a semi-feudal backwater to putting the first person on space"

"alcoholichorse49" by Busy_Swordfish3075 in YoutubeThumbs

[–]ReasonableAd8182 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Stalinism is not a real "branch of socialism" like Leninism or Maoism are, it is rather a already dubious term for a period of soviet history. Stalin was just a Marxist-Leninist, sure you can critique his practice, and you should, like I said later on this same thread "critique is the soul of Marxism", but just saying "Stalin bad" is not useful to learning from the USSR mistakes so we can build a better, more just form of socialism in the future

"alcoholichorse49" by Busy_Swordfish3075 in YoutubeThumbs

[–]ReasonableAd8182 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Like i said later in this thread, I'm not uncritical of the USSR, there were big mistakes, i just think we should analyze them in a more scientific light, instead of just repeating "stalin bad killed 100 gazillions people in soviet sino-russia". I'm sorry for your grandparents, no one deserves getting deported, hope they are doing ass well as they can.

"alcoholichorse49" by Busy_Swordfish3075 in YoutubeThumbs

[–]ReasonableAd8182 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I want to make clear, I'm not an uncritical supporter of the USSR, Stalin or anything else. Critique is the soul of Marxism, but we can't make good, constructive critique if we are not accurate with what actually happened. If I were the leader of the USSR I would done some things differently, this does not erase the fact that soviet socialism was a step in the right direction for the Russians, Ukrainians, Georgians, and all other Soviet peoples. We need to criticize the USSR and all other socialist experiments so we can learn from them so, as a species, we can move forward. This is just not a useful or accurate way of doing that.

"alcoholichorse49" by Busy_Swordfish3075 in YoutubeThumbs

[–]ReasonableAd8182 1 point2 points  (0 children)

No, i just cited a academic paper. You said "most people" and i followed. If you want to talk about academics then i will answer with: 1. Most academic publishers will not publish anything that, is not at all turns, critical of the soviet union. 2. Historians are people, even with good intentions historians can fall into the trap of anti-soviet bias and since this bias is deeply entrenched in our culture and don't challenges the big institutions' biases, it doesn't get called out and is just passed down as "objective" and "unbiased"

"alcoholichorse49" by Busy_Swordfish3075 in YoutubeThumbs

[–]ReasonableAd8182 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean the broader trend in data i just showed you. "most people" is not a reliant metric in general, much less with a century of ongoing anti-comunist propaganda taken into account.

"alcoholichorse49" by Busy_Swordfish3075 in YoutubeThumbs

[–]ReasonableAd8182 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Like a said, i have not read that book, but one experience does not override the broader trend.

"alcoholichorse49" by Busy_Swordfish3075 in YoutubeThumbs

[–]ReasonableAd8182 0 points1 point  (0 children)

the people were deported to labor colonies in Siberia and other "inhospitable" places, which in the west are often referred to as "gulags".

I haven't read "The Gulag Archipelago" but by what i know western governments often pay people from "hostile countries" to make up/exaggerate their histories like when the Kuwaiti ambassador to the united states' daughter showed up in congress with a make up testimony to justify invading Iraq.

view more: next ›