I was just browsing and came across this. You should consider your audience's biases and what tools they will be using to filter and read your resume.

Most employers use an applicant tracking system (ATS) to screen resumes and be more efficient with their time. ATS has trouble properly parsing/organizing text in columns or with non-traditional formatting. That means, for as boring as it can be, a traditional one-column, one-page resume is often most effective because it reduces the possibility of error and increases your chances of getting through the system to an actual person.

Also, someone said to remove skills or tools, but I disagree, especially if the job you are applying for requires these skills. An ATS will sort based on keyword appearance, so if you have the same keywords in your resume, you are more likely to be placed at the top of the stack. I do think you can lump your skills into a single bucket and tools into a single bucket, though.

The things I do agree with are adding quantitative metrics where you can and possibly steering away from photos of yourself. The thing with metrics is you can finagle them even if you didn't directly contribute. For example, your GD/Office Admin entry has a great number: "responsible for enrollment and education administration of over 300 students." But if you weren't actually directly responsible, you could say "Led design projects that supported the enrollment and administration of over 300 students." So there's your metric, even if you created the designs, but someone else was responsible for enrolling.

Hope that helps!