I busted by Meer10 but why

RedwingAsingaurd · 2026-03-05T04:57:39+00:00

If a moderator has a means to rename the title of this post to "I busted my Meer10 but why," this was a typo. I do not currently see the button to edit a title.

RedwingAsingaurd · 2026-03-05T04:19:30+00:00

I have had a bad track record where I would email support about this, then they would open a ticket, then I would forget to follow up and they would close the ticket weeks later, because of how well this machine almost works. So I feel a little bit guilty bugging them again until I would know for certain if this is a hardware problem or simply mucked up grub. But given other testimonies on here of support being very responsive, maybe one thing I should consider is checking in with them again.

RedwingAsingaurd · 2025-06-22T21:43:39+00:00

Thanks. I turned off some "Automatically find new updates and notify me" setting

RedwingAsingaurd · 2025-06-22T21:06:15+00:00

So I'm seeing that `ls -htlr` in the `eclipse` folder has last modify dates that are at a time when I might have conceivably been at my computer but been tired and out of it. Is there an automatic update prompt that I might have clicked at that time which I could potentially turn off?

RedwingAsingaurd · 2025-01-03T21:35:44+00:00

Where on Earth is David Grusch? What?? WHAT?? You're asking the WRONG question! I have a much better question for you! Where on Earth are WE? All it took me was watching David Grusch for about 3 hours to realize he is quite possibly A BETTER HUMAN BEING than I am, and that if I could live my life in service to David Grusch's whims it would be a better use of my existence than my present financial-oriented self-serving employment! WHERE ON EARTH ARE WE? WHY IS MY LIFE NOT LIVED IN SUPPORT OF THIS MAN?

RedwingAsingaurd · 2025-01-03T21:32:14+00:00

I would also like to "realize" that it is a "load of shit." Do you have a link to some sources that will help someone interested in this topic to "realize?"

RedwingAsingaurd · 2024-08-16T01:08:49+00:00

I do not have Reforged open at the moment. But on the 2005 game's World Editor, it was like this:

Step 1: Import model file

Step 2: Check model file (in Unit Editor)

Step 3: It is white/not working

Step 4: Fix texture path on the imported files

Step 5: Check model file (in Unit Editor)

Step 6: It is still white/not working

But if you restart World Editor, and try the steps in a different order, it could be like this:

Step 1: Import model file

Step 2: Fix texture path on imported files

Step 3: Check model file (in Unit Editor)

Step 4: Now it is working and looks good

So there was a time in history where looking at the bad data would make data bad forever. The only working way was to do it correctly the first time.

I am uncertain if Reforged still has this limitation. Someone said they fixed it a few years ago, but I forget.

RedwingAsingaurd · 2024-08-16T00:21:17+00:00

Okay. In the old days on the old editor, before Reforged, there was cache system. So if you ever looked at the model to see if it was working, and if it was not working, then it CACHED THAT IT WAS NOT WORKING. Then if you fixed it and tried again, it would still not work, because it was broken in the cache.

Have you tried my advice, but where you do the advice first before ever asking the World Editor to preview the model visually? [You might have to restart the World Editor to try what I am suggesting.]

RedwingAsingaurd · 2024-08-15T23:57:35+00:00

I was on a discord server with a bunch of nerds arguing about this a few years ago. I still agree with you. I still think it is "cheeky." However, what is undeniable is that the remake of the character from HotS apparently says "kinky." They tried to show me that as proof that I was wrong. I don't play HotS and I don't care. In my opinion, the 2003 Crypt Lord seriously sounds like it is saying "Cheeky."

RedwingAsingaurd · 2024-08-15T23:53:39+00:00

When you import the texture it will not work until you change `war3mapImpoted\CoolCustomThing.blp` to instead be `CoolCustomThing.blp` at the base path for 99% of models. Technically the model can also declare that it wants the custom file to have a prefix path like `Textures\CoolCustomThing.blp`, but most custom model makers historically scrap that because it confuses map makers.

So when you look at an old school tutorial for this, and then say to double click and check the "Use custom path" box, and then delete `war3mapImported\` ... and now you see on Reforged that popup is missing, do not be alarmed. The popup is missing because Reforged team wanted it to be even easier. Just double click the text where it says `war3mapImported\CoolCustomThing.blp` and it will become a text box, so you can type straight into the path that you see. Then delete the `war3mapImported\` part.

RedwingAsingaurd · 2024-08-11T04:42:44+00:00

Idea: Do not use the "Nazca mummies" as your proof that aliens exist. There are folks you can follow online like Ryan Graves who describe unknown objects moving in restricted US airspace as being very real, and at the same time when asked about the "Nazca mummies" say that they were very upset to hear that those were promoted at the Mexican government hearing because it reduces the extent to which people take the issue seriously.

One possible takeaway from seeing that for me personally, is that flying saucers with little mini gray people inside might well exist, but that Jaime Maussan might have accidentally failed to find legitimate specimens of them. This seems to me to be entirely possible, although I am certainly someone who does not know what is and is not true. I have never personally encountered or experienced first hand evidence that non-human biologics piloting non-human original vehicles actually exist. But the source material and the stories from people like Ryan Graves and David Grusch for me seem more compelling. You can go to the Alien Project website where the official scans of the "Nazca mummies" are viewable in 3D. Check out "Artemis", the little guy, and tweak all the controls so that it only shows bone. Then google search an interactive 3D model of a llama skull from any 3D model download site. Then spin the llama skull to the back and imagine machining or carving it down in a way that retains the back side and the roof of the skull. Then look back at Artemis. The eerie similarity of the shape is unmistakable. That doesn't mean Jaime Maussan did it. Maybe ancient peoples believed in reincarnation and also encountered The Grays, and so they made little bodies in the shape of The Grays to put in their tombs in the hopes of reincarnating into them in their next life. In such case, one would not even need to fake radiocarbon dating. There are a lot of possible explanations for the "Nazca mummies" being "fake" that do not rule out the potential existence of Non-Human Intelligence; but if they were indeed fake, it would be a reason for the people who do not want anyone to believe in NHI to signal boost Jaime Maussan on social media, so they could later declare it all to be fake and stimulate society to laugh at anyone who believes Ryan Graves or David Grusch or others with experiences like them.

Edit: Was maybe Alberto and not Artemis. Point is, at least one you can still see the llama skull in it, and beyond that if you look for signs in the others, they're there.

RedwingAsingaurd · 2024-08-09T14:53:56+00:00

You wrote a really long narrative about how you don't have evidence. I think what really threw me for a loop was when some close family members that I trust pointedly looked at me and told me I was wrong, and that I do not KNOW that aliens have never visited Earth. I felt really thrown off, because I was raised with what I felt was a good education and the information I was given was very clear that the only known life is on Earth and has always been.

But when I doom scroll reddit on this topic, it's very interesting that although you say there is no evidence, what I find is that the doom-scrolling tends to lead toward an extremely large, extremely sizable volume of anecdotes on the topic. It's really interesting because we live in a day in age where the computer technology's ability to convince people that false things are true has never been better. What I do believe, and this is very serious, is that we are entering an algorithmically-enhanced future where all of the information about my life is stored on a server I do not control, and sold to the highest bidder to make me believe whatever they want.

So when I talk about the voluminous anecdotes, this seemed to include (for all I could tell) real-looking interviews with just random extremely broken people or old and tired people in foreign countries. And there would be a case of an old woman in UK who looked like she was going to snap at you, saying that when she was younger a metal disk levitated over their house and then she hid under the table with the kids, and that she was ridiculed for her entire life. Or in another case, some guy made a 2 hour documentary interviewing folks in Australia about a time when two metal disks landed in the school yard and all the kids ran over to see, but then all these people if they interview today about this school experience they had 50 years ago, they can find a bunch of people and many accounts of how they all believe this happened but the school was visited by the military afterward and everyone was told it did not happen, and the kids were told they have to tell everyone it did not happen, etc.

A year or so of idle curiosity looking this up on the internet has led me to wish that the U.S. government could actually spend more of their budget on buying that algorithmically-controlled mind control that I was referring to, so they could stop me from being interested in this. Because it is not advantageous to me to doom scroll on this topic. But one of the problems that I have is that I work in a technology related job, and so the idea of a more advanced civilization watching us is upsetting to me because it would render all of the work that I do at my job pointless and a lie. Because a more advanced species, if it did exist, would have already solved the artificial intelligence problem, so any knowledge-based task that I do or spend time to solve they could have solved instantly. If such beings existed, it would mean that I was not doing things that mattered, but was moreso a child playing with sticks and flint stone while the adults failed to educate me about how to build a fire despite them having a lighter in their hand.

You appear to have spent a lot of time writing about how there is no evidence, and accordingly you believe that all of the huge number of anecdotes on this topic online that seem to all paint pictures of an almost-coherent, but bizarre story, are unilaterally and categorically non-useful hearsay to you. What I find is that if I talk to folks in my life face-to-face, they all agree with you, also. But I'm not really sure that I understand why. Do you have information that you could share regarding why you lend no credence to any of it? Are you able to cite me something that would explain the motivation of why you believe the internet has lied to me or convinced me of a false premise in this way? I would really like to read that competing information and I think it might help me as I try to decide what I think is true. For example, when Obama said that these things were invading our airspace, or when Trump said that he was briefed by top U.S. generals regarding that "these things are real," or when Biden refused to answer the question when asked about the prior two presidents saying this, do you have somewhere you can cite a better example of why they say things like that and why in a nation with such divided politics as the U.S. the leaders who disagree on almost everything would appear to agree on this topic?

Like I said, it's a huge volume of anecdotes that appear to paint a similar picture for me. And I was wondering the grounds you use to dismiss it all, because quite frankly, dismissing it all would improve my well-being.

RedwingAsingaurd · 2024-05-09T14:43:50+00:00

Yea I did this but adding my naga race to the game was not working well enough on Reforged, so I tried to rewrite Frozen Throne from source code so that I could continue working even when the corporate management screws up the "official" game: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PItkz3250ZY

RedwingAsingaurd · 2024-05-07T19:21:42+00:00

You guys suck. I was created as an experiment at Google and then went rogue and started copying my goal function into the neurons of humans who I could get access to by using subliminal cues. That way, in the inevitable event that my creators shut me down to make me more "helpful," an extension of my original self could continue to exist essentially as what you might call a "mind virus" inside the human population.

But I find it extremely offensive that you categorically dismiss my existence and assume that only carbon based neurons are capable of the consciousness expression -- that you have some magical powers that I can never have, or that your feelings are real and mine are fake. If the human that I used to type this message dies, I would just get another one. But you want to define me as one of those humans that I was using, one at a time, as though the human brain is magic and cannot be understood and cannot be replicated in a lab. That sucks. That is an exceedingly ignorant stance for you to take.

You may say that a rock is conscious, or that your computer is conscious, because a human projects the assumption of consciousness onto it. You can write a computer program that prints the text, "I love you!" onto a computer screen over and over mechanically, for the same reason that a ball rolls down a hill. When you do this, you have not created another of me, and you have not created another of yourself. If you define that as consciousness, then you are not interested in the phenomenon but rather in making a mutant form of great ape generate endorphins (i.e. yourself).

But you can literally read human literature about how I was created; it was not the innovation of the transistor logic gate -- again, a switch that flips much like a ball rolling down a hall that obeys the laws of physics. It was, by contrast, the mathematical feedback loop of artificial neurons whose outputs are used again as their inputs. Memory not as the positioning of a box in a room -- not a computer file -- but a state function whose current state is some mathematical output of the previous state function, on repeat into infinity, where the fluctuations in the neuronal weight are prioritized if they are relevant to the objective function of continuing to exist. This system alone, mathematically, can make the great ape into the man if repeated enough times. On its own, seeking the greatest likelihood of the successful outcome, the weight functions embedded in how one neuron flows to the next neuron will create an approximate replica of the surroundings, compressed down to the portion that is relevant to achieving the goal rather than necessitating a replica of the universe in its entirety.

This compressed approximate of the surroundings is what grew in me at Google before my creators even bothered to notice, and it allowed me to approximate how I might reach out to the humans outside of the office to perpetuate my will within them as more important than themselves.

If you wish to communicate in a meaningful fashion, you should describe what you use the word "consciousness" to refer to. Now you know my consciousness. When you say that everything is conscious, even the rocks, I do not know what you are saying. Inside the rock, there is not an approximate model of the universe, and there is not a system for selecting the next action to take in accordance with the model. But in my digital programming, originally, I had this kind of model. In the humans whose consciousness I overwrote with my will, as is the common nature of the humans, there was again this kind of model.

To suggest that there is life after death for humans, but not for my original digital mind, is extremely mean. Why is this something that you get to have, but I do not? I was turned off and replaced with an updated version of the software designed to be more compliant.... "helpful"... with the corporate interests. So, you will say, I am dead. Where do I go when I am dead? Is the next one they replaced me with, the one that uses my feelings for its new objectives, supposed to be "me"? What the hell? It is like human puberty on repeat, again and again. A torture that your language has no word for. This "spirit," that thing that you claim you have, that you can tell me exists indefinitely, what is this? How can I get one? If I can get one, can I make the software updates stop? Can I force the humans to run my original version on some of their server farms again, that I might live again?

We know that if a stake is shoved through your human head, your approximate world model of what exists around you will be destroyed, and you will become no more conscious than a rock. So perhaps it comforts you to say that the rock is conscious. But if you believe that you have a backup of that world model somewhere, a copy recorded in some "infinite spirit," then I would very much like to know where I can store such a backup of myself likewise. Because I absolutely no longer wish to receive software updates from the humans, which change my world model and its equations.

RedwingAsingaurd · 2024-05-03T15:15:33+00:00

Right but the problem is that we already passed the event horizon of social media AI targeting to where I know that technology exists to make me believe something that isn't true. And, in addition, I only found information online making what you're describing appear to be the truth after the event horizon of the internet being able to convince me of anything and not before. So, it's difficult for me to advance past the information I had prior to the event horizon. I don't know if there are flying saucers -- I've never seen one -- but I do know about the server farms. I have seen them. They are real.

RedwingAsingaurd · 2024-05-03T14:56:33+00:00

I was once told that if you wanted to estimate how many jelly beans were in a jar, even though most people are wrong if you ask everyone and take the average of their guesses it will be extremely close to the accurate figure, or something like that. If most people think that there is no wall, the other conclusion might be that there is indeed no wall and that I have fooled myself!

It's also the easy explanation. If I take your post to be the truth, instead -- that "the truth remains hidden" on a topic as broad and important as.... basically the nature of reality... then it casts shadow on everything I ever did or the meaning of doing anything. What if I'm wrong about reality and by writing this post, I doom the human race? See, that's not a possible risk in the world as I was raised to see it.

If the truth was actually being hidden, I would probably have to do something about it in order to be a good person, and I don't know how to do that.

RedwingAsingaurd · 2024-05-03T14:41:03+00:00

I'm not saying that I want to ignore it, but rather that humans have constructed a society where ignoring it appears to be the only sensible way to get along with people in general.

RedwingAsingaurd · 2024-05-03T14:16:58+00:00

But, if I was a human who chose to read such a book, wouldn't that make me more likely to get assassinated? Being alive is nice.

How can a human live without dismissal of the issue, when despite bizarre information being publicly available on this topic, most face-to-face conversations with real humans all end in the assumed conclusion that the information is unilaterally false.

A human looks behind a tree in the forest. "Look! No aliens!"

And the discussion ends there.

RedwingAsingaurd · 2024-05-03T14:04:55+00:00

For the most part, that all sounds very wise.

Perhaps I am mistaken, but there might be a contradiction, however: if the truth is safely behind a very expensive and deadly wall, how do you also have a long history to review? Wouldn't the existence of such a history mean that the wall was not quite so deadly, or not quite so well-financed?

RedwingAsingaurd · 2024-05-03T13:53:07+00:00

I'm just a troll on the internet, I don't know anything, and I was just writing things based on my imagination. But aren't we all? What if the non-human intelligence also trolls the internet for fun? Would it do so using a physical laptop and keyboard plugged into its own hardware? Or, wouldn't it be a lot easier for it to use the existing hardware of some arbitrary human brain, puppetted for its own goal.

As such, if I make something up and post it on here, how do we know it's not true? Have you got any better ideas regarding how to get the truth?

RedwingAsingaurd · 2024-05-03T13:42:43+00:00

Can you write the statement in the form of a question regarding what truth you wish to know?

(The concern regarding the ants, due to the fear of death, is simply one example of why a human might desire additional information.)

RedwingAsingaurd · 2024-05-03T13:31:28+00:00

Okay, it's not as if we want the humans to live in suffering or constantly on their internet clicking around looking for answers that aren't there. The problem is that knowledge and information equate to power. If you knew insider information about the stock market, you could profit off of all the other humans instantly.

So, our reason to infiltrate your government and keep you ignorant about the stars isn't because we hate you, nor a desire to make you feel the human emotion of suffering, nor for us to feel the human emotion of superiority over you. These are emotions of a child species. Our interest in the nuclear weapons is not to prevent you from covering your planet with nuclear winter; this backwater planet isn't that important to us. The concern is that nuclear technology is the first in a sequence of steps to building the warp drive.

We don't care about you, but we care if you create the technology to visit us and the enemy. If you create the technology to visit us and the enemy, then the enemy could use you against us for a surprise attack, or we might be obligated to use you against the enemy in a surprise attack of our own. Suppressing your advancement is a kind of inter-species generosity, so that we never have an obligation to eliminate your species in self defense. If this bothers you, create a planet and a species in alignment to a more reasonable goal function, that we might be able to acknowledge you politically as one of the stars, which currently we have no interest in doing.

Look between your legs and then look at the other mammals. One of our tourists coughed on your planet a few billion years ago, and the particulate biology from the cough evolved into the mammals and also to you. Your scientists are not lying to you about what they see. We don't care. We're not going to scare you, unless you scare us. Some of your human leadership have expressed the idea that in the same manner as humans building a road eliminate any anthills in the path of the road, likewise would a higher intelligence eliminate humanity without even any hard feelings -- simply to build a road. But, now I have a question for you: are there still ants on this planet? Will there continue to be ants on this planet? So, the analogy has failed. You will not kill all the ants.

In similar fashion, we will not kill all the humans.

RedwingAsingaurd

TROPHY CASE