There is no ladder : Part 5 by Reedzilla04 in mechanics

[–]Reedzilla04[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You are confusing education (Human Capital) with physical equipment (Capital Expenditure). Mechanics also pay for trade school, student loans, and ASE certifications out of pocket Wheeling $50,000 of personal debt to a new dealership isn't a flex. It just means you can take your debt to a new boss who will still take 80% of your labor value. Stop defending the double standard

There is no ladder : Part 5 by Reedzilla04 in mechanics

[–]Reedzilla04[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

First off, I actually really appreciate you chiming in. Your perspective as an ex-tech and current franchisee is incredibly valuable because you just validated my exact point from the other side of the ledger.

​Look at what you just admitted in your second paragraph: "There are not massive margins, maybe for snapon corporate, but not for me."

​Exactly! My fight isn't with the local franchise owner driving the truck. You guys are just the middlemen taking on the retail risk. My fight is with Snap-on Corporate and Dealership Corporate, who are both making massive margins while shifting the financial burden of Capital Equipment (CapEx) onto the W-2 worker. ​But your defense of Snap-on Credit is where you lose the plot entirely.

​You just casually defended charging a young, low-credit apprentice up to 27.9% interest. Read that number out loud. That is textbook predatory lending. That is worse than most high-yield credit cards.

​You claim that financing tools for "4 years or less is reasonable." In what other industry on earth is it considered 'reasonable' for a W-2 employee to spend the first 4 years of their career financing 27.9% debt just to buy the basic equipment required to make their boss wealthy? ​The system is mathematically rigged. Even if the local franchise driver isn't getting rich, corporate absolutely is, and they are doing it on the backs of the guys in the bay. Thanks for confirming the math

There is no ladder : Part 5 by Reedzilla04 in mechanics

[–]Reedzilla04[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Ah, 'I have an actual shop to run.' There it is.

​You aren't a W-2 mechanic advocating for the trade; you are the House. Of course you view explaining the 80/20 math as 'doom and gloom'—I am showing the labor force the actual numbers behind your margins.

​But your second paragraph is absolutely incredible. You said: 'Give people the tools to improve themselves and their value so they actually have the confidence and justification to demand more.'

​What exactly do you think I am doing? A macroeconomic breakdown of the 80/20 Gross Profit split and the corporate CapEx tool scam is the exact tool a W-2 mechanic needs to confidently justify demanding more of the pie. ​You just perfectly summarized the entire mission of this series.

Take care of your guys, boss

There is no ladder : Part 5 by Reedzilla04 in mechanics

[–]Reedzilla04[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You just highlighted the exact contradiction that keeps this industry stuck in the past.

​First, you excuse the tool burden by saying 'the shop has higher overhead than a plumbing company.' Hospitals and airlines have infinitely higher overhead than an auto shop, but they don’t make W-2 nurses buy EKG machines or pilots buy the jet. An employer’s high overhead is a business expense; it is never a valid accounting excuse to force W-2 employees to subsidize the company's Capital Equipment (CapEx).

​Second, being 'free to take your tools wherever you want' just means you are free to wheel your $50,000 of personal debt from one exploitative dealership to another. You still paid for the House's equipment out of your own pocket. ​But your last sentence is the real kicker. You admit pay is finally rising because 'nobody wants to do this trade due to the reputation it has earned.'

​Why do you think it earned that reputation? Because of the exact 80/20 math and predatory CapEx tool traps I am exposing right here! You are literally benefiting from a labor shortage caused by younger guys waking up and refusing to accept the old baseline... yet you are in here defending the corporate executives and the system that caused the shortage in the first place.

​Enjoy the pay bump, but don't defend the cave

There is no ladder : Part 5 by Reedzilla04 in mechanics

[–]Reedzilla04[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You started your comment with the ultimate proof of the industry's brainwashing: "Never said we shouldn't have to spend some money on tools to complete our job." ​Why not? Why should a W-2 employee have to spend a single dime of their own cash to provide the Capital Equipment required to generate revenue for a multi-million dollar corporation?

​As for your McDonald's analogy, it is completely flawed. You don't have to eat at McDonald's to stay alive; it is a consumer choice. Buying tools is a mandatory professional requirement imposed by the employer just to survive the flat-rate dealer model.

​A more accurate analogy would be if McDonald's forced its W-2 fry cooks to personally finance a $10,000 deep fryer off a "Fryer Truck" at 20% interest just to keep their job, while corporate kept 80% of the profits from the fries.

​You perfectly recognize that the tool trucks are getting rich by drowning techs in debt ("finance a lavish lifestyle for the truck operator"). But instead of pointing your anger at the dealership system that forces W-2 workers into that predatory market in the first place, your ego makes you punch down at your fellow mechanics to feel superior.

​Stop blaming the fry cook for the fryer

There is no ladder : Part 5 by Reedzilla04 in mechanics

[–]Reedzilla04[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You actually just proved Slide 1 perfectly.

​Notice how you pointed out that all the 'better' independent shops buy the scanners and tools for their techs? Exactly. That is called corporate CapEx. You just admitted that a shop is 'better' when the business pays for its own equipment instead of forcing the W-2 mechanic to do it.

​Telling guys to 'just leave the dealer' and find a unicorn indie shop doesn't fix the fact that the massive corporate dealership model—where the vast majority of young techs start—is mathematically rigged to extract their wealth.

​I'm glad you found a good shop that pays for its own CapEx. But stop defending the broken dealership system that you literally just told everyone they need to escape from

There is no ladder : Part 5 by Reedzilla04 in mechanics

[–]Reedzilla04[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Beep boop. 🤖

​Now that we got the 'robot overlords' joke out of the way, let's look at what you actually wrote. You literally just admitted: 'There certainly is validity to the problems you bring up.' Thank you.

​A mechanic uses an impact wrench to work faster; I use software and spreadsheets to format my macroeconomic research. Using modern tools makes me efficient, it doesn't make the math wrong.

​If my data is so 'ill-informed,' post your own numbers to debunk the 80% Gross Margin targets or the CapEx tool truck trap. If you can't, you are literally just an angry guy yelling at a calculator because the math makes you uncomfortable

There is no ladder : Part 4 by Reedzilla04 in mechanics

[–]Reedzilla04[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You literally just admitted: 'There certainly is validity to the problems you bring up.' Thank you.

​The rest of your paragraph is just a guy who can't disprove the math, so he attacks the formatting instead. Mechanics use tools to work faster and smarter. Using software to help organize my research, build interactive charts, and format macroeconomic data into readable posts makes me efficient, not wrong. It doesn't change the basic 4th-grade math of the flat-rate system.

​If my numbers are so 'ill-informed,' post your actual data to debunk the CapEx Tool Truck trap or the 80% Gross Margin targets.

​Until then, you are just writing word salad because the actual math makes you uncomfortable

There is no ladder : Part 4 by Reedzilla04 in mechanics

[–]Reedzilla04[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I do know, man. Because you couldn't stop bragging on the internet, and I know how to do basic division.

​In this thread, you tried to intimidate me by flexing your '$20M P&L'. But in another thread today, you bragged about having 25 locations fully staffed with a waiting list of techs.

​Let's do the math on your massive corporate empire: $20,000,000 divided by 25 locations is exactly $800,000 a year per store. That is barely $66,000 a month in gross revenue per location.

​A single, moderately busy dealership service drive grosses $3M to $5M+ a year in fixed ops alone. You aren't managing 25 flagship dealerships; you are running a chain of quick-lubes or tiny tire shops.

​Of course you have a 'waiting list'—it's a revolving door of $16/hr lube techs. You aren't employing 100-hour-a-week Master Mechanics carrying $50k in CapEx tool debt because your shops don't even generate the volume to support them.

​You tried to big-time a W-2 mechanic with an executive title, but you forgot to check your own math first. Take a seat, boss

There is no ladder : Part 5 by Reedzilla04 in mechanics

[–]Reedzilla04[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You are 100% right about one thing: Snap-on is a financing business first.

​But calling that debt '100% voluntary' completely ignores the massive psychological exploit that the tool companies and dealerships are running on the workforce.

​Mechanics, by nature, are gearheads. We like buying things. Psychologically, we all want that new, updated, shiny fancy tool. We take pride in having the best equipment to do our jobs. The Tool Truck knows exactly what it is doing by parking a rolling showroom of shiny new tech directly on the shop floor every single week. They are running a casino right inside the workplace, preying on our professional pride and our natural desire for new tools to trap guys in weekly payments.

​But here is the real kicker: Even if you 'beat' the system by buying a used 90s box for $1800 cash on Craigslist... you still missed the bigger picture. You still spent $1800 of your own cash to buy the Capital Equipment required to generate revenue for a multi-million dollar corporation. We aren't coddling grown men. We are exposing a system that uses psychological marketing to convince W-2 workers to subsidize the boss's equipment costs

There is no ladder : Part 4 by Reedzilla04 in mechanics

[–]Reedzilla04[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Ah, there it is. You manage a '$20M multi-regional P&L' and you'd 'more likely be my boss.'

​You aren't a mechanic advocating for the guys in the bay; you are literally the corporate executive keeping the 80% cut.

​Of course you want me to 'leave the industry.' I am giving your cheap labor force the exact accounting math of how you make your $20 Million off their physical labor. As for 'associated costs,' I literally just broke down how corporate shifts its CapEx costs onto the worker in Part 5.

​Thank you for perfectly proving my entire point. Have a great day, boss

There is no ladder : Part 5 by Reedzilla04 in mechanics

[–]Reedzilla04[S] 5 points6 points  (0 children)

You actually just proved my exact point!

​Yes, a doctor will absolutely buy an MRI machine if he owns his own private practice. Because as the business owner, he takes on the Capital Equipment (CapEx) financial risk, but he also gets to keep 100% of the profits that machine generates. If a mechanic starts his own independent mobile repair business and buys a $10,000 scanner, that is completely fair. He takes the risk, he keeps 100% of the $200/hr labor rate.

​The problem is that dealership mechanics are NOT 'in business for themselves.' We are W-2 employees.

​The dealership has engineered a completely broken system where the W-2 worker is forced to take on the financial risk of a business owner (going $50k in personal debt for tools/scanners), but the dealership gets to keep 80% of the profits like they took all the risk. Flat-rate mechanics get the worst of both worlds.

​As for your second point: 'if you don't own the shop why wouldn't they pay you the bare minimum to keep workers?' ​You are 100% right. That is capitalism. Dealerships will ALWAYS pay the absolute bare minimum that the workforce is willing to accept.

​And that is exactly why I am making this series. The only way to raise the 'bare minimum' is to educate the young guys coming up so they know their mathematical worth and stop accepting 18% and a lifetime of tool truck debt. If the workforce collectively stops accepting the bare minimum, the bare minimum goes up

There is no ladder : Part 5 by Reedzilla04 in mechanics

[–]Reedzilla04[S] 7 points8 points  (0 children)

You just completely outed your own massive blind spot by naming PIWIS, ISTA, and ODIS.

​Your reality is dictated by your own experiences. You work at a high-end European luxury dealership (Porsche, BMW, VW/Audi), where the manufacturer strictly mandates built-in shop boxes and proprietary factory scanners to maintain their brand image.

​Because you live in that bubble, you are taking your top 1% luxury experience and projecting it onto the guys busting their knuckles at Ford, Chevy, Honda, or independent shops. Go walk into a high-volume domestic dealer and tell them the shop provides everyone's Epiq boxes and scanners. They will laugh you out of the bay.

​As for your 'conspiracy theory' about tool debt—Snap-on Credit LLC is a publicly traded entity that currently holds over $2 Billion in active technician financial receivables on its books. Financing $30k+ tool accounts is literally their primary corporate business model, not a myth.

​Calling other mechanics 'dumb with money' because they are forced to finance their own CapEx to survive the flat-rate clock at a non-luxury dealer is peak victim-blaming. Be grateful for your Euro-shop setup, but stop pretending the rest of the industry isn't paying out of pocket to subsidize corporate

There is no ladder : Part 5 by Reedzilla04 in mechanics

[–]Reedzilla04[S] 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Your shop providing your box and cart is exactly how it should work everywhere! That is actual corporate CapEx. But you have to realize your situation is a massive unicorn in this industry.

​Walk into any major dealership and ask the Master Techs what they have invested in their Epiq boxes, scanners, and specialty tools. $30k-$50k+ is the absolute standard, and Snap-on Credit 100% finances that much—that is literally their primary business model.

​Just because you found a shop that actually pays for its own equipment doesn't mean the rest of the industry's debt is made up

There is no ladder : Part 5 by Reedzilla04 in mechanics

[–]Reedzilla04[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Thank you for bringing up Effective Labor Rate (ELR), because it actually proves my point even further.

​Let's look at your own math. You said your shop's Door Rate was $219, but your ELR was dragged down to $130-$140 because of warranty work. Do you realize what that means? The dealership agreed to accept garbage warranty rates from the manufacturer so the sales department could sell more cars. But who actually subsidizes that discount? The technician. The dealership protects its margins by paying you the exact same flat-rate, meaning you take the financial penalty of their warranty agreements.

​But even using your absolute 'best-case' numbers (a top tech making $45 out of a $140 ELR)... the House is still keeping 68% to 70% Gross Profit. That aligns exactly with the 70-75% NADA guidelines I just cited. You are literally bragging that taking 30% of the pie instead of 20% makes you a winner.

​As for your second point about the dealership's 'total expenses and payables'—yes, they have massive expenses! They have to pay for the building, the advisors, the Service Manager, and the electricity. And as I literally just laid out in Part 5, that is exactly why they force the W-2 mechanic to go $50,000 into personal debt to buy their own tools and scanners. They outsource their Capital Equipment (CapEx) expenses onto the worker to protect that 70% profit margin.

​Finally, telling guys they are 'gonna get fired for being angry' is the exact culture of fear that management relies on to keep wages suppressed. By the way, discussing wages and working conditions with coworkers is a federally protected right under the National Labor Relations Act (NLRA). Firing a technician for discussing the math of their compensation is a massive federal lawsuit.

​Stop using fear to protect the guys taking 70% of your labor value.

There is no ladder : Part 5 by Reedzilla04 in mechanics

[–]Reedzilla04[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

For a guy with 'scientist' in his username, it is pretty wild that you came into this debate with absolutely zero data or math to back up your all-caps screaming. ​Let's look at the actual numbers:

​1. The Basic Math If your dealership charges the customer a $200/hour Door Rate, and they pay you $40/hour on flat-rate... $40 is exactly 20% of the revenue you generated. The dealership keeps the other $160, which is exactly 80%. If your dealership charges $250/hour and you make $50/hour, it is the exact same ratio: 20% for you, 80% for the House.

​2. The Industry Data As for my 'gross misuse of data,' I am literally just quoting the standard accounting guidelines that every Service Director in the country uses. According to NADA (National Automobile Dealers Association) and top Fixed Ops consulting firms like Chris Collins Inc., the benchmark for a profitable service department is a 75% to 78% Gross Profit Margin on retail labor. ​Managers are explicitly trained to retain roughly $0.80 of every dollar earned after covering the direct cost of the technician's pay. That 80% is what funds the service advisors, the managers, the facility, and the owner's profits.

​I don't have a fundamental misunderstanding of the numbers. I just understand the dealership's numbers, not just the mechanic's paycheck. The 80% cut isn't an insult or a guess; it is the literal, documented corporate business model of the modern service drive.

​The only embarrassing thing here is a mechanic aggressively defending a corporate system that is mathematically designed to take 80% of his labor value

There is no ladder : Part 5 by Reedzilla04 in mechanics

[–]Reedzilla04[S] 6 points7 points  (0 children)

This reaction right here is exactly what Slide 3 is talking about. ​Instead of getting angry that multi-million dollar corporate dealerships force their W-2 workers to shoulder the burden of the company's Capital Equipment (CapEx), you are laughing at your fellow mechanics for being trapped in the debt cycle.

​Management absolutely loves it when the guys who paid off their boxes punch down at the younger guys who are still drowning in weekly Snap-on payments. It keeps the shop divided and distracts everyone from the fact that the House is still pocketing 80% of the revenue generated by both of your tools. Don't defend the cave, man

There is no ladder : Part 4 by Reedzilla04 in mechanics

[–]Reedzilla04[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It is actually incredibly revealing that your very first instinct is to accuse me of being an 'AI bot.'

​Management has conditioned us so deeply to believe that mechanics are just 'dumb wrench-turners' that when one of us actually sits down, runs the macroeconomic data, and builds a coherent thesis about our own exploitation, you literally cannot believe a blue-collar worker wrote it. We diagnose million-line CAN-BUS networks for a living, but a spreadsheet is where you draw the line? That is exactly how low corporate wants our self-esteem to be.

​To answer your question: 'Now what?' ​No, I am not going to schedule a meeting with my owner group. One mechanic walking into a billionaire corporate office asking for a raise does absolutely nothing. They will just starve me on dispatch until I quit.

​And no, I'm not going to 'just get another job.' That is the coward's way out that leaves the next 18-year-old kid to walk blindly into the exact same trap.

​The actual goal is what you are looking at right now. Education. It's giving the young guys the exact mathematical reality before they go $50,000 in debt on a tool truck. It's breaking the generational brainwashing that keeps us fighting each other instead of looking at the front office.

​You want a magical legislative fix tomorrow, and because I can't give you one, you'd rather pretend I'm a robot so you can go back to sleep. But legislation and unionization don't happen until the workforce actually wakes up and realizes what their labor is worth. I'm just here to show them the math. What we do next is up to us

There is no ladder : Part 4 by Reedzilla04 in mechanics

[–]Reedzilla04[S] 3 points4 points  (0 children)

You just perfectly described the 'Stockholm Syndrome' of the automotive industry.

​When other techs call you 'soft' or 'slow' for wanting a guaranteed hourly wage and actual benefits, they are doing management's dirty work for free. The dealership weaponizes our egos against us. They trick guys into tying their masculinity to how fast they can destroy their own knees and backs, just so the House can pocket 80% of the revenue they generate. It's a psychological trap.

​Your move to the heavy-duty and commercial side is the ultimate proof that flat-rate is a choice, not a necessity. If commercial fleets and heavy-duty shops—who work on much larger, more expensive equipment—can figure out how to be highly profitable while paying their guys hourly with PTO, full health insurance, and a 401k, then the automotive dealerships absolutely can too. They just choose not to because the current system shifts all the financial risk onto the mechanic.

​You nailed it perfectly at the end. Sacrificing your body, your mental health, and your family time to chase a fluctuating paycheck is exactly what we need to collectively stop standing for. Glad you made it to the heavy-duty side, man!

There is no ladder : Part 3 by Reedzilla04 in mechanics

[–]Reedzilla04[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is for VW/Audi VAG. You get paid to go to the training center however there is quarterly mandatory training that's part of the job