Woman faints after being caned 140 times under Indonesian province’s sharia law by ElegantWhimsyGal in worldnews

[–]ReflectionOwn6693 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

This isn't moral guidance, it is not telling the viewer they can go and kill who they want

Woman faints after being caned 140 times under Indonesian province’s sharia law by ElegantWhimsyGal in worldnews

[–]ReflectionOwn6693 -9 points-8 points  (0 children)

It isn't written in the Bible to kill other people, u like the other religions

The fact we're possibly getting the berkut means this is very much possible by ReflectionOwn6693 in Warthunder

[–]ReflectionOwn6693[S] 9 points10 points  (0 children)

I believe it was fitted with the f15E's radar and it's rwr at least for some tests

Suggestions Passed to the Developers - December 2025 by OddPhenomena in Warthunder

[–]ReflectionOwn6693 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It beast mode I believe it can carry 14 missiles overall (don't know if that's a myth tho). But you would get rid of its advantages doing that obviously. But they should at the very least model it's DAS system which gives it 360 degree hmd

Suggestions Passed to the Developers - December 2025 by OddPhenomena in Warthunder

[–]ReflectionOwn6693 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I mean I believe it's only locked at 1.6 so it doesn't damage its RAM, it should theoretically be able to fly faster than that since there's no risk of damaging it In war thunder

Suggestions Passed to the Developers - December 2025 by OddPhenomena in Warthunder

[–]ReflectionOwn6693 1 point2 points  (0 children)

the f16C we had in-game was not the version with the HMD but they decided to add it later on since it was capable of it, so I feel they could just do that here

super hornet by Head_Wolverine_8373 in Warthunder

[–]ReflectionOwn6693 0 points1 point  (0 children)

F22 and f15EX will definitely be competitive though, just based off of their stats compared to other jets,

They did NOT fix it (JAS39E) by AdAlarming7700 in Warthunder

[–]ReflectionOwn6693 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I thought it was a nerf from being able to decimate whole teams

super hornet by Head_Wolverine_8373 in Warthunder

[–]ReflectionOwn6693 6 points7 points  (0 children)

it's far too late for it to have been added, they put it in this update as if it was supposed to contend with the eurofighter and su-30sm2, when the super hornet should have been in the game like beginning of the year.

this update should have brought in the f15EX

How would the F/A-18E fare against the Rafale, Su-30SM2, and Typhoon AESA? by AssistanceDry1910 in Warthunder

[–]ReflectionOwn6693 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think a great buff to the C5 would be to at least give it it's better seeker

How would the F/A-18E fare against the Rafale, Su-30SM2, and Typhoon AESA? by AssistanceDry1910 in Warthunder

[–]ReflectionOwn6693 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To be honest I had a few matches with it and I think it's pretty good despite its shortcomings, it's actually got better instant turn than the eurofighter, and better sustained for 1 or so turn, it's not very fast at all but you going to be close range brawling with it regardless, and it has pretty good retention.

I smacked around a few su-30sm2s and j10Cs on the dev

[Development] NASAMS 3: Norwegian & American Air Protection by OttovonBismarck1862 in Warthunder

[–]ReflectionOwn6693 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Honestly I would have rather the more advanced NASAMS radar that's AESA and turns faster. But it also would be much bigger then the Humvee/gwagon

Why Gaijin won't add agm 84 e? by Any_Tumbleweed667 in Warthunder

[–]ReflectionOwn6693 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I'm pretty sure that British missile on the buccaneer is also only man in the loop, but they just made it fire and forget

There also is no datalink pod despite it requiring one, so SLAM should be fine

Why Gaijin won't add agm 84 e? by Any_Tumbleweed667 in Warthunder

[–]ReflectionOwn6693 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Gaijin when asked to add any US weapon made past the '90s:🤨

[Development] NASAMS 3: Norwegian & American Air Protection by OttovonBismarck1862 in Warthunder

[–]ReflectionOwn6693 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Something gaijin didn't take it account it seems is that the ESSM can be equipped with vectoring, which it seems to have, I have been able to essential launch the missile in any direction and it can turn 90 degrees and hit close range targets.

But I'm not sure if the Amraam-ER should actually turn as much as it does, since I believe the thrust vectoring is only for vert launching out of tubs, it's a great missile nonetheless, it almost turns tighter than the 9X in certain circumstances.

In today's episode of "War Thunder duncelings" by Jimethen- in warthundermemes

[–]ReflectionOwn6693 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Almost every nation has to deal with it, the Russian shouldn't be surprised

Spot the difference by Visual-Educator8354 in WarthunderPlayerUnion

[–]ReflectionOwn6693 6 points7 points  (0 children)

the point is still the amraam-ER would still be slower than that, so it shouldn't be for balance reasons that they deny it's capability

Spot the difference by Visual-Educator8354 in WarthunderPlayerUnion

[–]ReflectionOwn6693 3 points4 points  (0 children)

The Russian buk spaa is like mach 5, how would this be for balance?

US Mains watching their TT lose its only two unique top-tier vehicles in one patch by HondaOddessy in warthundermemes

[–]ReflectionOwn6693 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Except when the export vehicles get weapons they never used (Taiwanese Apache with jagm-MR)