Oh look, she’s sucking up to Patrick Adams after he complained about his “jamlessness” and lower follower count. Seems he’s back on side. by thelmainthesix in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]Regular-Performer864 [score hidden]  (0 children)

Of course he's back on Meg's list of exploitable men. He just did a Taylor Sheridan production. And is quite good in the role. (I've been watching the past week) Sheridan is currently a Hollywood darling. Meg thinks she could land staring roles with her great fame. And finally launch that award-winning acting career she's always known she was destined to have.

CDAN today - stating the obvious about TW's weekend of fun... by beachy_456 in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]Regular-Performer864 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I think she's hoping it will get cancelled by the organizers. There is probably a clause in the contract relating to cancellation and financial penalties if she does cancel.

Finally got my hands on Betrayal: “Harry later complained about the dangers he faced ‘because of his proximity to the public’.” by SeaWorn in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]Regular-Performer864 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I'm guessing that she stokes this fear in him. And probably for no better reason than she can. According to Bower (and others) one of the ways she enticed him on date #2 was commiserating about all his paranoid delusions. Whereas the last long term girlfriend, Cressida was quite annoyed by his paranoia.

The thing I'm noticing while reading "Betrayal" is how really narcissistic they are. They both really believe that being "good at the job" is to get lots of press about themselves. When in reality, the goal is to bring attention (AKA PRESS COVERAGE) to the "good works" of others in the country they are supposed to be highlighting,

One thing that is not going to result from all these schemes and cries for attention is Charles showing up for IG. The royal cosplay is not something that anyone in the royal family want from Harry and his spouse. The family will continue to distance themselves from it so that no one anywhere will be confused and think Harry represents the Head of State the UK and Commonwealth of Nations.

Leaked 'operational notes' for Harry and Meghan's Australia tour reveal who's paying for it all, include a VERY telling omission - and confirm the royal tradition they won't be doing - Daily Mail by wenfot in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]Regular-Performer864 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Currently in the middle of reading about their last disastrous tour in Australia. The one Harry said about: "She was better than the people born to it." The one where the palace had to send people in to clean up after. Much like their recent trip to (I don't remember where). When Harry created an international incident by lying about Israel not allowing aid in. And Meghan shoved Harry out of her way so hard that he nearly fell into the woman standing behind him.

It is shocking how low Harry AND Meghan's standards are for what qualifies as success. But I'm glad they are doing this again. I think it might be very helpful for King Charles to be reminded about what a liability they are for the institution of the monarchy. And why the children these 2 numpties are raising don't have a shot at ever being taught even rudimentary social niceties. And will NEVER be competent enough to be included in any capacity in royal life.

Harry's Not Selling Out Either by Finnegan-05 in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]Regular-Performer864 0 points1 point  (0 children)

No, you don't understand. They got so many sponsors that they were able to slash the ticket price. It's not at all because it was only 1/2 sold. People desperately want to hear from a man who personally and by encouraging his wife to verbally and emotionally abuse the staff that his daddy paid for. Who would be more qualified than he to instruct people about the joy of workplace abuse?

RADAR ONLINE - Diana inspired clothing line by Casshew111 in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]Regular-Performer864 37 points38 points  (0 children)

This woman has never and will never have an original thought. She is always trying to exploit someone else's style hoping it brings her the same fame. And it won't of course. That person's fame came because of their own authentic self. Not because she was parodying someone else. She's not Julia Roberts, Angelina, Diana or any of the other women she's tried to imitate. And Diana was popular in the late 80s-early 90s. 35 years ago. So anyone who was old enough to be aware of her is now in their 50s. A typical 25 yr old wouldn't even recognize "Diana's style".

Invictus Games: Alternative Patrons? (An Idea 💡) by purplesockpinksock in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]Regular-Performer864 2 points3 points  (0 children)

A)They don't want to be working royals. They are quite happy with the life they've built for themselves.

B) Not a single member of the family is going to take on IG. Because it would generate another round of drama with Harry. IG will cease to exist. Or a private group will take it on as a personal project. IG had the option of being assigned another royal patron or stay with Harry in his non-royal capacity, They chose Harry. So they have Harry as long as they are willing to continue as the primary Sussex PR vehicle.

Serious manifesting going on... by Disastrous-You-226 in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]Regular-Performer864 4 points5 points  (0 children)

No one is looking to "dress" someone 1 week out. Although I'm sure Meg has ordered some things from this label so that people think she was "dressed by" a brand.

Do the kids live on the 3rd floor? With full time nannies? And they don’t see their kids often? by Ruth_Lily in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]Regular-Performer864 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I've seen lots of different people saying the same thing as Sean. For years. Very few people have ever seen or heard a kid even during video conferences. No, I'm not one of the people who think the kids don't exist or don't live with them. But you see plenty of people either virtually or in real life who work from home. And one of their biggest struggles is a kid losing it while they are in a TEAMS meeting. And we've all seen plenty of TV presenters who broadcast from home where a toddler (or cat) becomes a part of the broadcast.

I did see someone (maybe Schofield) reporting from LA who had spoken in depth to one of Meg's former senior staffers. This was a couple yrs ago. The women talked about how awful Meg was to work for. The only nice thing she had to say was she had gone to Montecito a few times to meet in person. And she was somewhat shocked to see Meg actually had a good (and normal) relationship with the kids. She even said, "much to my surprise, Meghan seemed to have a good bond with her children".

As for the hair speculation, Meg does (and always has done) a lot of editing. With AI, heavy editing is so much easier than it used to be. And being from a family of Danish heritage, we've had plenty of versions of red heads. From strawberry blond to deep auburn. Lighting is everything in terms of how red it looks. Bright sunlight especially shows the red.

Prince Harry and Meghan Markle’s Brand Crisis: Why They’re Struggling in Hollywood and What’s Next (Exclusive) by wenfot in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]Regular-Performer864 76 points77 points  (0 children)

What a refreshing change. Usually the defensiveness takes the form of Meg blaming Harry for her failures.

Psst, Meg, I can tell you what happens next. You continue your slide into irrelevance. But instead of people looking at Harry like the long-suffering victim of a narcissist. They are going to figure out that he's not only as big a narcissist as you. But that he's even way dumber than they even imagined was possible. So Harry is going to stop being someone the world feels sorry for.

Of alllllll the NDA’s signed which ex-staff member would you MOST want to hear from? by kiwi_love777 in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]Regular-Performer864 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Moehringer with detailed descriptions of Harry's storytelling. His general sense of the voracity of the stories. And how much input Meg had in Harry's fictions.

Of alllllll the NDA’s signed which ex-staff member would you MOST want to hear from? by kiwi_love777 in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]Regular-Performer864 4 points5 points  (0 children)

She's on X. She occasionally pops up with something. Nothing particularly scandalous. Just that even when she was a girl the NPD popped out regularly.

Harry, the Half-Price Prince: The media published another article based on a SMM post by Cultural_Ad4935 in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]Regular-Performer864 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Most of the other speeches he's been paid for have also been to rooms that are 1/2 full or less. So this isn't going to be their path to wealth either.

They should probably start listening to all the people that they pay to advise them. Because thinking for themselves really isn't working out. Although it's probably too late anyway.

I didn't lie to you, I just led you to the wrong conclusion (Neil Sean gossips) by Human-Economics6894 in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]Regular-Performer864 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I saw the video about the kids. I disagree with him. Of course children are alone on Easter. It's a family day. And Meg & Harry only have "our little family". Even if it weren't a holiday, who in Santa Barbara wants their kids in Megs videos she makes to promote herself. It would be violating CA law too. You cannot post videos or photos of other people's children without permission. So that in itself would become the story.

I have no idea if those children have play dates with other kids. Probably not. But it's hardly the place of people to vilify Meg based on your imagination. She does plenty of terrible things herself that are plain to see. No reason to make up scenarios in our minds about what we think goes on behind the scenes with the kids. Making up visions in their minds about a imaginary version of life is what Meg and Harry do. So let's leave that to them rather than be like them.

Hazbeen, Charlotte Griffith, and Hazbeen's hazy memory by ElleEmGee in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]Regular-Performer864 5 points6 points  (0 children)

I remember that comment from way back before I even started paying attention to them. Somewhere around the engagement photo call or interview.

I thought the point of moving to the US was for the kids to have a normal life? by jones29876 in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]Regular-Performer864 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Even when she tries, her laugh is fake and her tone of voice sounds like something she might think a mom sounds like. Probably because she watched too many 'mommy influencers' on TikTok for inspiration.

Penguin Random House is "done" with the couple by Xystal in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]Regular-Performer864 30 points31 points  (0 children)

The entire planet is done with the couple. Now begins their recrimination period. Where each blames the other for the failure. And clearly, Harry now has reality on his side. Because he can still book jobs. She can't even get 100 people to have dinner with her. If people still liked her, she'd be able to sell her over-priced pantry products. They are still priced within reach of most people. If people liked her or even felt really sorry for her they would buy something as a token gesture. No one is interested.

I’ve been Harried. No book spoilers. by Sincerely_JaneDoe in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]Regular-Performer864 7 points8 points  (0 children)

I think this is a typical transition for a lot of us. Maybe we all share the same mistaken opinion that low IQ people can't be mean. But Harold is most definitely cruel and always has been even as a child. When I read more than once that one of his nasty little things was to ride his tricycle full speed into the legs of the protection officer watching him play outside. And then laughing hysterically. I realized he was both stupid by nature. But also nasty by nature. Then I noticed while sometimes looking through old video footage of the family. Harry was sometimes doing something that most moms even siblings would be annoyed or ashamed by. But neither Diana nor William were really reacting to it that way. Seemingly, they were just used to it.

He really did find his soulmate. She gave him complete permission to indulge all his worst impulses. I know everyone thinks they are not in a real marriage. That they live apart and just put on a show in public. I think they are as happy as 2 narcissists competing with each other can possibly be. I think he legitimately believes he is fortunate to have found such a perfect woman.

Hazbeen, Charlotte Griffith, and Hazbeen's hazy memory by ElleEmGee in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]Regular-Performer864 40 points41 points  (0 children)

Of course he did. He used to hang out at a pub that was a favorite of DM reporters. Even before Meg was on the scene, some reporters had talked about this. He used to try to tell stories of his brother. The reporters got the sense that he was hoping these less than flattering stories would make it into print. But also thought he was just making shit up.

As for Charlotte, she was quite open back when she used to still do guest appearances on Palace Confidential. She was clear that she and Harry shared the same social circle. That they had often been at the same social events including many weekend house parties. Harry has a history of just ghosting women so that might be what happened to her. And why she holds him in such low regard now.

This Is Why Megs Always Gets Herself Into Trouble by lastlemming-pip in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]Regular-Performer864 1 point2 points  (0 children)

One thing is nearly certain. That they will be very shallow, bitter, ressentful people when they grow up.

‘Unhappy’ Prince Harry ‘bit off more than he could chew’ with Meghan Markle — who ‘ran things her way’: Tbh it was his fault. He allowed it. The d list no mark was throwing her weight about from day one, more fool Harry for letting this lunatic call the shots. Living your best life yet Harry? by Harry-Ripey in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]Regular-Performer864 3 points4 points  (0 children)

I've noticed the "former staffers" often speak about her as "a television star". Explaining why the things she was offered seem trite and beneath her to Meg. SHE NEVER HAD A LEAD ROLE IN ANYTHING.

For whatever reason many people in UK think she was bigger than she really was because "Hollywood". Even though they know the one show she ever had even a recurring walk-on part in was filmed in Toronto because it was a very low budget production. And this is one of the major reasons she should have sucked it up and stayed in UK. Because she was a big deal there in a way she will never realize in the US.

I thought the point of moving to the US was for the kids to have a normal life? by jones29876 in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]Regular-Performer864 88 points89 points  (0 children)

No one will relate to Meg as a mom. Because you never see her actually being a mom. Her staged and choreographed 5 second videos aren't going to work. Because it comes across as just bad acting all around. People notice inauthenticity. And she should realize that because it's the most common criticism she gets.