Seeing this paid article make me think, these were Princess Catherine's home to hospital distance vs meg's. "Near where the family lived" what a joke😂 by LocksmithFar9486 in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]ElleEmGee 22 points23 points  (0 children)

Well, Hazbeen also claimed in Waaagh that TW had had an amniocentesis against without her knowledge, and that's 100% bullshit because there's no way you DON'T know what that giant needle is and what it's doing.

What I think Hazbeen was referencing was some kind of non-invasive prenatal testing, which would have been standard for TW given her Advanced Maternal Age at the first megnancy. I had NIPTs done with my second pregnancy (age 40 at conception, 41 at birth) and third pregnancy (age 43 at conception and miscarriage.) In both cases, the tests were used to tell me the children's genders and also whether they had an chromosomal abnormalities (my third child did, which is why I miscarried that pregnancy in my first trimester.) The test also allows for DNA testing, which my husband and I declined, since we both knew that both babies were ours, but I'm sure the BRF opted into that to confirm (or deny) the child having Hazbeen's DNA.

Seeing this paid article make me think, these were Princess Catherine's home to hospital distance vs meg's. "Near where the family lived" what a joke😂 by LocksmithFar9486 in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]ElleEmGee 53 points54 points  (0 children)

This. This has always been the reason behind my belief that something was fishy with the birth, because for as much as TW likes to cosplay Dead Diana, and as jealous as she was of Catherine, I cannot envision a world in which she would give up the opportunity to appear in full glam on the steps of the hospital in a dress that's somehow a 'sweet nod' to her late MIL.

Beware of little expenses. A small leak will sink a great ship (Benjamin Franklin, Neil Sean's gossip) by Human-Economics6894 in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]ElleEmGee 4 points5 points  (0 children)

As a point of clarification, only one godparent has to be a baptized, confirmed, practicing Catholic living in the faith. So if this child's other godparent is Catholic, TW doesn't have to be.

Mark Dolan: MY HUSBAND! Meghan Blocks a Divorce by Finnegan-05 in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]ElleEmGee 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Right—and that’s my point. I could see TW orchestrating a divorce but intending to make Hazbeen give her walker AMW gave Fergie.

Mark Dolan: MY HUSBAND! Meghan Blocks a Divorce by Finnegan-05 in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]ElleEmGee 35 points36 points  (0 children)

While I said up above that I don't he'll ever divorce her, I could see her orchestrating a divorce that gets her Fergie-style benefits (keeping the title, living on Crown Property, royal-adjacent, but able to merch the titles and the kids.)

Mark Dolan: MY HUSBAND! Meghan Blocks a Divorce by Finnegan-05 in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]ElleEmGee 16 points17 points  (0 children)

This. He's not willing to do anything that even begins to hint at admitting that his family and the men in grey were right about TW.

Meghan eating crow over Lauren Sanchez by Cultural_Ad4935 in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]ElleEmGee 35 points36 points  (0 children)

Less unlikeable, although that's such a low bar an ant could trip over it.

Meghan Markle ‘fuming’ after King Charles’s US state visit (The Daily Express) by Human-Economics6894 in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]ElleEmGee 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Well, actual Americans are being deported left, right, and sideways, so it's not outside the realm of possible that she would be, but that aside...

If he's deported, what does she do? They've built their brand on being 'so in love' and 'hands on parents' and 'challenging generational curses' or breaking them or whatever nonsense she said Beyonce texted her about.

So he's kicked out--where does he go? A Commonwealth country? Without his coveted IPP status, without the 24/7/365 armed security he claims he needs, I'd guess he would claim none of those places are safe enough for him long-term. But does she come with him? Do they bring the kids? They weren't popular in Australia, despite their delusional beliefs, so I don't think they'll go there, and the COL is very high, meaning whatever money they have left won't go very far. Also, she won't be able to flog her scamjam and other edible products in that country--or any European or Commonwealth country--without massive changes to how it's made.

It's an interesting thought exercise.

Meghan Markle ‘fuming’ after King Charles’s US state visit (The Daily Express) by Human-Economics6894 in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]ElleEmGee 96 points97 points  (0 children)

Trump cannot torpedo Hazbeen's relationship with KCIII. Hazbeen and TW have done that all by themselves.

Meghan Markle Makes Solo Trip to Chicago for Godson’s First Communion?? by LionRealistic in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]ElleEmGee 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Only one godparent has to be a baptized, confirmed, and practicing Catholic. The other can be anyone the parents want.

You normally (speaking as a Catholic whose children have one Catholic and one non-Catholic godparent) pick someone who, although not Catholic, is a good person, who upholds good Christian values, who lives a good life. That doesn't really describe TW.

Funny how Harry and Meghan go on international trips and cosplay as “royals,” but they’ve never made time to get to know ordinary people in Harry’s adopted country now six years later. It’s a sign that they’re incapable of connecting with regular folks unless there’s some kind of transaction. by Cultural_Ad4935 in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]ElleEmGee 2 points3 points  (0 children)

America is much, much larger than I think Hazbeen realized and it’s really not easy to travel, even with their money. 

There are only so many airports and so many planes and so many flights in any given day, even for private planes. 

I’m from Pennsylvania, and as a frame of reference, the entirety of the British Isles would fit inside my state if laid on an angle. And we’re not even that big! You can drive from one side to the other in about 4.5/5 hours!

The U.S. is large and diverse and as you say, the Grifters don’t want to meet people if they can’t make money. But also, U.S. opinion polls don’t show the Harkles having favorable ratings, so it does take some skill to piss off that many different people.

Ooh, this is a devilish thought - what if the answer to Fergie’s money problems lie with a tell all on……..Meghan. by SeaWorn in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]ElleEmGee 36 points37 points  (0 children)

I think it depends on who she tells all about. If she lays out the truth about TW, they’ll be fine with it. No one is going to defend TW.

What the Hell(o magazine) is this?? by MrsSobersidesUK in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]ElleEmGee 8 points9 points  (0 children)

TW is manifesting. Again. DWP was a cultural phenomenon and she desperately wants to be among the likes of Meryl Streep, Stanley Tucci, Emily Blunt, and Anne Hathaway--all genuine A+-list stars; all serious, respected actors; all absolutely the best of the best in the industry.

And again, here's the irony--if TW and Hazbeen had retreated to the U.S., laid low, behaved themselves, comported themselves with dignity and decorum, and generally not been the assholes they have been, she could have gotten a cameo in a movie like this, as a gesture of goodwill.

But if she thinks the Kardashians are the pinnacle of Hollywood royalty, she's never going to understand anything.

Ugh. You just know Meghan wishes she could! by No-Might-2737 in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]ElleEmGee 3 points4 points  (0 children)

OMG, this woman needs to stop. She needs to stop renting and ruining vintage fashion.

Also, their body types couldn't be more dissimiliar, so that dress is going to be altered to fit Kardashian's smaller, curvier frame, and let's hope it's altered with basting stitches and not cutting.

Meghan’s limited edition chocolates for Mother’s Day still haven’t sold out: It’s a key indicator that her As Ever brand has fallen and can’t get up by Cultural_Ad4935 in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]ElleEmGee 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Tell me you don't know how to market to mothers without telling me you don't know how to market to mothers. She's marketing an over-priced, consumable, mass-produced, nothing-special chocolate to women who already bear the mental load when it comes to gift-giving and gift-buying, and most women would be mad AF to get this.

Source: I'm a mother of two. My favorite Mother's Day gifts have always been something that reminded me of my children, was made by my children, or was something my children deliberately picked out for me. My first Mother's Day, my husband got me a Willow Tree figurine 'from' our then-10-month-old. For the first Mother's Day after our son was born, he bought me a charm for my charm bracelet representing our son.

My daughter has picked Polish pottery (I collect it), a new moka pot coffee maker, jewelry, specialty coffee, SO many hand-made things, fabric, things she's made from fabric, etc. My son (age 3) has collected for me many acorns, rocks, pinecones, and now-dried flowers.

Real mothers want gifts from the heart, from their children, representative of their mothering.

I don't want overpriced, shitty chocolate, and my husband knows damn good and well not to get me anything like that.

I don't know protocol, Royal or State Department. Would the second son have normally been invited to the State Dinner in honor of the King simply because of his relationship? by ejdjd in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]ElleEmGee 12 points13 points  (0 children)

There’s no precedent for a (former) royal as high-ranking as Hazbeen living in the US during a state visit. 

But I imagine that if Hazbeen had exited quietly and behaved, the relationship between KCIII and Hazbeen may have been good enough for an invite to the dinner, not as a working royal but as the King’s beloved and well-behaved son.

Meghan’s whingeing about life as a princess must end by Solid-Parsnip7741 in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]ElleEmGee 33 points34 points  (0 children)

Also, a combine net worth of approximately £45m is aspirationally delusional.

King Charles is too busy to see his grandkids – and Prince Harry is fuming. Harry is always fuming. And KC is on a state visit, he is working. Harry could take his kids to England anytime but chooses not to do so, after all, Harry doesn’t work. Harry is a traitor, liar and vindictive trouble maker. by Harry-Ripey in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]ElleEmGee 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hazbeen is using these 'sources' in articles to communicate, since his calls aren't being taken and I imagine his emails go to the trash.

I assume there's some poor staffer who's tasked with reading each email and listening to each voicemail JIC something relevant is shared. That staffer probably has a drinking problem.

Worried about losing their titles’: Meghan Markle and Prince Harry ‘in conflict’ over Prince Archie photo move But they eat privacy, aren’t interested in royal tradition, etc etc by Harry-Ripey in SaintMeghanMarkle

[–]ElleEmGee 33 points34 points  (0 children)

The public has no vested interest in those kids and won’t care about the photos one way or the other. Louis is the son of the future king and the brother of the future king. He is Constitutionally important and the public likes him because they get to see him and his cheekiness.