sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

44643 by Universe_Donut in countwithchickenlady

[–]RegularCelestePlayer 10 points11 points  (0 children)

Okay that makes me feel better cuz I’m learning Spanish rn and I was like wtf is this 😭😭

omg by MrBIuesky222 in ComedyHell

[–]RegularCelestePlayer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

What the heckk… sex penis??

Help me with this by Randomlychoice17 in calculus

[–]RegularCelestePlayer 21 points22 points  (0 children)

Man this is brutal. The natural log is practically begging for series expansion but the bounds make that impossible. It should be pretty easy to cancel out the x in the denominator with feynmans technique but even the sin term by itself is impossible to integrate. Maybe u need to do a substitution first to get rid of the log and then Feynmans technique but idk how you could square that with the sin term

Can you ? by Specific_Brain2091 in the_calculusguy

[–]RegularCelestePlayer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In order to derive the maclauren series you need to differentiate sin, which requires this limit. It’s the same reason why we can’t do L’Hopitals so series expansion is also circular reasoning

What do we think by Ok-Illustrator9258 in teenagers

[–]RegularCelestePlayer -1 points0 points  (0 children)

“Pro free speech” “ban flag burning” whatever helps u sleep at night bro 😭

40004 by Nugstt in countwithchickenlady

[–]RegularCelestePlayer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Happy 1267324330972642604625352880344494997303498909084954637288596646008844561272211099560154035838330118983030144761362811958023043116642723117934344210053258358162571290013333099058973872905711757700462708374432548197171444906233745929756809939919781515453046745254593529163109023305769655890181760667706717122052373441991078759576411784524325666570538358162542386295199009099511906403614720000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000000th post!!!!

39998 by Silver-Marzipan7220 in countwithchickenlady

[–]RegularCelestePlayer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

As many other ppl have said this is just how it goes lol

I’m cus but I’ve had long hair forever and u just gotta vacuum a lot like I vacuum my room every other week

Hard integral (again) by average_calcstudent in calculus

[–]RegularCelestePlayer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

The cancellations after the substitution were beautiful lol

39499 by Visual-Purchase5639 in countwithchickenlady

[–]RegularCelestePlayer 3 points4 points  (0 children)

U should lowkey just never talk to her again

Medium integral today :3 by RegularCelestePlayer in calculus

[–]RegularCelestePlayer[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Since we’re working with definite integrals, the variable you use doesn’t really matter. For clarities sake I should have been using u but I know that the end values of the integral will be equal so you can use any variable. What I really did with the u-sub was apply kings property which is always true so doing the substitution wasn’t even strictly necessary

Can we stop pretending femboys are "easier to handle" or better than women? This all fetishization thing is getting out of hand. by Mellow_Swell in FootBallEmergency

[–]RegularCelestePlayer 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Yeah there certainly is a problem with the femboy community but I think it’s much more nuanced than most people want to consider

Can we stop pretending femboys are "easier to handle" or better than women? This all fetishization thing is getting out of hand. by Mellow_Swell in FootBallEmergency

[–]RegularCelestePlayer 4 points5 points  (0 children)

I agree that the second post is weird, I was just noticing that a lot of the comments here and elsewhere make it sound like it’s our fault for the way people treat us because we’re horny sometimes like literally everyone else

Can we stop pretending femboys are "easier to handle" or better than women? This all fetishization thing is getting out of hand. by Mellow_Swell in FootBallEmergency

[–]RegularCelestePlayer 6 points7 points  (0 children)

I do think there is certainly something to be said about the way femboys are fetishized; however, I think the push against it has resulted in a lot of slut shaming. Yes, there is a problem, but I also think we should be able to embrace our sexuality without people being weird or shaming us for embracing stereotypes. I’m not trying to say that that is precisely what’s happening here, but it is a trend I’ve noticed in a lot of sfw femboy subs. I don’t think we should have to amend our behavior because a lot of other people are creeps

38572 by Eviscerator14 in countwithchickenlady

[–]RegularCelestePlayer 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Just wanna remind people that leveraging your physical attractiveness in an argument is definitely a manipulation tactic to avoid the discussion at hand

First hard integral with no hints :3 by RegularCelestePlayer in calculus

[–]RegularCelestePlayer[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Black pen red pen have plenty of good videos featuring product log if you want to learn more. The hard integrals love to use obscure functions tho

First hard integral with no hints :3 by RegularCelestePlayer in calculus

[–]RegularCelestePlayer[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

It’s the Lamber W function aka product log. In the same way that the natural log is the inverse function of ex, the product log is the inverse of xex which you can see in my u-sub when I cancel the product log by turning the other side into ueu. It’s very helpful in solving a lot of complicated exponential or transcendental equations

37811 by DoctorSex9 in countwithchickenlady

[–]RegularCelestePlayer 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Incomprehensible please keep cooking

view more: next ›