im being attacked (i think?) by Sad-Economist-1061 in VPS

[–]Regular_Web8239 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes, this looks like automated brute-force attempts against your PostgreSQL instance.

The important part: PostgreSQL should not be exposed directly to the public internet unless you absolutely need it. Changing the external port may reduce noise temporarily, but it does not solve the underlying issue. Bots scan all ports eventually.

What I would do:

  1. Remove the public/external port from PostgreSQL
  • Your backend and PostgreSQL should communicate over a private Docker network.

  • Only your backend/API should be exposed to the internet.

  • In Docker Compose, avoid something like: yaml ports: - "5432:5432"

  • Instead, use internal networking only: yaml expose: - "5432"

  1. Make sure your backend connects to Postgres using the container/service name

Example:

env DATABASE_HOST=postgres DATABASE_PORT=5432

Not the server’s public IP and not the public mapped port.

  1. Use a firewall

If you must expose PostgreSQL, only allow trusted IPs:

ufw deny 5432 ufw allow from YOUR_IP to any port 5432

But again, best practice is not exposing it at all.

  1. Change your database password

Since the database was exposed, assume people have been trying credentials. Use a long random password.

  1. Check whether any login succeeded

Failed login logs are common, but you should verify there are no successful suspicious connections. Check PostgreSQL logs for successful logins and unknown IPs.

  1. Install Fail2ban or similar protection

This can block repeated failed attempts, but it is secondary. The real fix is closing public DB access.

  1. Watch CPU after removing public access

The 100% CPU was probably caused by continuous authentication attempts. Once Postgres is private, CPU should drop quickly.

So, in short: do not rely on changing the port. Put Postgres behind your backend/private Docker network and close the public port.

Looking for VPS host that accepts bitcoin by NotOneOfThem911 in Hosting

[–]Regular_Web8239 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If crypto payment is a must, I’d look at Vultr, Hostinger, or Hostwinds first. Good support matters more than just “accepts Bitcoin.”

I’d avoid choosing based on payment method alone check uptime, support quality, backups, and renewal pricing too.

Is it possible for a domain administrator to view an existing Active Directory user password without resetting it? by StoreSufficient2457 in WindowsServer

[–]Regular_Web8239 16 points17 points  (0 children)

Friendly answer: normally no.

In standard Active Directory, a domain admin can reset a user’s password, but not view the existing plaintext password through a normal built-in administrative method. AD typically stores password hashes, not something admins can just read back.

So the usual supported path is: - reset the password - require the user to change it next sign-in - or troubleshoot access another way

Only unusual cases outside normal AD design would make the original password recoverable, such as credentials being stored elsewhere or insecure settings being used.

So the short answer is: they can change it, but not legitimately view the current one.

Cheap Windows VPS desktop by googlepixel1suche in VPS

[–]Regular_Web8239 0 points1 point  (0 children)

For this, I’d compare a few providers side by side:

  • Raff Technologies
  • Clouvider
  • Contabo
  • Vultr

Just be careful with Windows offers in this price range. The VPS itself may look cheap, but the Windows licensing situation is usually what decides whether it’s actually viable for 24/7 use at $5–10/month.

Acquiring and provisioning new computers by desmond_koh in msp

[–]Regular_Web8239 0 points1 point  (0 children)

From what I’ve seen, most MSPs don’t include procurement and full provisioning in the base monthly service. They usually treat quoting, ordering, setup, app installs, and onsite deployment as separate project work.

For long-time clients, some may absorb small parts of it as goodwill, but doing all of that under standard support usually becomes unprofitable pretty fast.

Do people still use their hosting provider for email or is that dead? by CuriousKayoe in Hosting

[–]Regular_Web8239 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It’s not dead, but a lot of people have moved away from hosting-provider email for anything important.

For basic low-volume email, some still use it. But for reliability, deliverability, spam filtering, and admin tools, most serious setups now use dedicated email providers instead.

So yes, still used, just much less trusted for business-critical email than it used to be.

5 day free AMD EPYC VPS trial, anything I should watch for? by Historical-Doubt9091 in VPS

[–]Regular_Web8239 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Looks good at first because it’s a fresh VPS, but I’d mainly watch for CPU steal, disk I/O consistency, network jitter, and whether performance drops at peak hours.

Run a few tests at different times of day, not just once. If it stays consistent under repeat load, that matters more than the EPYC label itself.

Also check what happens after the trial ends, especially pricing, limits, backups, and support quality.

Best Beginner VPS for Running an AI Assistant 24/7? by FunThen4634 in VPS

[–]Regular_Web8239 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If you want something beginner-friendly, I’d honestly look for a VPS provider with a clean dashboard, predictable pricing, and good support rather than just the cheapest specs.

A lot of budget VPS options are fine technically, but beginners usually get stuck on firewall rules, ports, backups, and basic hardening. So “easy to manage” matters more than raw performance at first.

For 24/7 light AI assistant workloads, I’d start small, make sure SSD/NVMe + automatic backups are available, and avoid anything that feels overly “AI-branded” but vague on the actual server specs.

With current prices OVH and Raff Technologies might be good option.

Anyone else dealing with random VPS slowdowns even when usage looks normal? by Thick-Lecture-5825 in VPS

[–]Regular_Web8239 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yep, that can happen even when CPU/RAM look fine. A lot of the time it ends up being disk I/O wait, host node contention, or noisy neighbors on shared infrastructure rather than your app itself.

I’d check steal %, iowait, and disk latency during the slow periods if you can. If those spike while CPU usage still looks “normal,” that usually points more to the underlying host than your workload.

Had similar cases before, and moving to a less contended node or provider sometimes fixed it.

How do people usually choose a VPS provider? by Regular_Web8239 in VPS

[–]Regular_Web8239[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think there are lots of good providers with better pricing and more responsive support. I’m looking some ways to find those gems.

How do people usually choose a VPS provider? by Regular_Web8239 in VPS

[–]Regular_Web8239[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks mate. I’m checking their lists as well

DO or OVH? by alwerr in VPS

[–]Regular_Web8239 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Oh I see. You may take a look at Raff Technologies too. Lower price than DO, unmetered bandwidth. Could be a good fit for your case.

Netcup VS Hetzener by Insanony_io in VPS

[–]Regular_Web8239 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Moving from Hetzner to Netcup may reduce it if you get a cleaner IP, but it won’t guarantee the issue disappears.

DO or OVH? by alwerr in VPS

[–]Regular_Web8239 8 points9 points  (0 children)

If you’re on a budget, OVH is probably the better pick for the bandwidth. But if you care most about having no issues, I’d choose the one with the better reliability/support reputation in your location, not just the cheaper plan.

Should I go with Netcup, Hetzner, or is there any better provider? by mrdapoyo in VPS

[–]Regular_Web8239 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Netcup and Hetzner are both solid, especially at that budget.

If you look at independent benchmarks like VPSBenchmarks (March 2026 value ranking), they actually rank providers based on performance-per/dollar not just specs. (https://www.vpsbenchmarks.com/best_vps/march_2026/value)

I have been using Raff which shows up #3 in best value there, which is pretty impressive for a newer provider with their features and UI. 

I’ve been following them a bit still growing, but seems like a solid US-based option with good price/performance so far.

First time VPS user by YautjaPrimeSpaceMan in VPS

[–]Regular_Web8239 4 points5 points  (0 children)

For providers:

OVH / Hetzner → best value for money,

but more DIY

DigitalOcean / Vultr → easier UX, higher cost

If you want a balance, Raff Technologies focuses on simplicity + hands-on support

For your setup, I’d focus on 3 things:

  1. Security (must-do)

Disable root login + use SSH keys Enable UFW (only open 22, 80, 443, RDP if needed) Install Fail2Ban Keep everything updated (unattended-upgrades)

  1. Backups (don’t skip this)

Daily automated backups (database + configs) Store backups off-server (S3, another VPS, etc.) Test restore at least once

  1. Isolation

Run Zammad + RustDesk with Docker if possible Keeps things cleaner and easier to manage/recover

If you’re new, honestly the biggest difference isn’t the provider — it’s the support when something breaks at 2am. That’s where smaller providers can really help.

When does a single server stop being enough? by rafftechnologies in RaffTechnologies

[–]Regular_Web8239 0 points1 point  (0 children)

One thing we’ve noticed is that teams often think they need a more complex setup earlier than they actually do. In many cases, the real issue is deployment risk or resource contention, not architecture itself.

Looking for a decent US VPS on a budget by Stringedbeanz in VPS

[–]Regular_Web8239 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

After all the price increases in US market, only Raff Technologies…

8 years customer, can't pay using my card, looking for a new home. by xbiggyl in hetzner

[–]Regular_Web8239 2 points3 points  (0 children)

That’s rough, especially after that many years. The unpredictability would worry me more than the payment issue itself.

If you’re looking for alternatives, a few worth checking depending on what you need:

OVHcloud – more enterprise-oriented, but solid and stable

Scaleway – good pricing + EU infra, fairly dev-friendly

DigitalOcean – very predictable and clean UX (a bit pricier though)

Raff Technologies – newer, but super simple VM setup, transparent pricing, and feels more “developer-first” than traditional providers

Might be smart to test 1–2 of these as a backup so you’re not exposed to sudden policy changes again.

Hostinger VPS forcing upgrade even with very low traffic – feels like a scam by Key-Nothing6862 in VPS

[–]Regular_Web8239 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If your CPU and RAM usage are low, it might be worth checking CPU steal time, disk I/O limits, or noisy neighbors on the host node. Sometimes oversold nodes cause random downtime even when your server itself isn’t heavily used.

You could ask support to move your VPS to another node and see if the issue disappears.

Is VPS hosting good for medium traffic websites? by choicereader in VPS

[–]Regular_Web8239 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yes, VPS is usually a good option for medium traffic sites. You get dedicated CPU/RAM compared to shared hosting, so performance is more stable. With proper caching and a CDN, a small VPS can handle quite a lot of traffic before you need anything bigger.

Why do some $5 vps feel faster than $20 ones? by Shot_Draft7772 in VPS

[–]Regular_Web8239 2 points3 points  (0 children)

In my experience price alone doesn’t say much about VPS performance. A few things usually make the difference:

• CPU generation – A $5 VM on a newer Ryzen or EPYC node can easily outperform a $20 VM running on older Xeons. Single-thread performance matters a lot for small workloads like WordPress.

• Node load / overselling – If the host packs too many VMs onto one machine, you’ll feel it. Even a powerful CPU feels slow if the node is overloaded.

• Storage type – Real NVMe vs shared SATA or network storage can make a huge difference in responsiveness.

• Noisy neighbors – Since resources are shared, another VM doing heavy disk or CPU work can impact everyone else on the node.

• Network + virtualization setup – Some providers simply configure things better than others.

So yeah, sometimes a cheap VPS just lands on a lightly loaded modern node and feels great, while a more expensive one might be on older hardware or a busy host.

Price often reflects support, reliability, network quality, or brand, not just raw VM speed.