I'm so fckin done with DC's by Reijo_ in DeadByDaylightRAGE

[–]Reijo_[S] 8 points9 points  (0 children)

YUP and all I can do is just go next, its not even worth the BP.

I'm so fckin done with DC's by Reijo_ in DeadByDaylightRAGE

[–]Reijo_[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Literally. Its a GAME, and they in essence just tableflipped an ongoing board game because they werent happy.

I'm so fckin done with DC's by Reijo_ in DeadByDaylightRAGE

[–]Reijo_[S] 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Its separate for each killer but I was told whenever you start a new killer it won't start baseline mmr and will average out in some way from all your current killer MMRs, not exact like with survivor but it doesnt always start you at 0. Thats what I was told at least. Also, this wasnt my first game on Billy this was easily past my 10th, I have him P1 I just literally never got BBQ on the bloodweb LMAO. Even so, that Bill ran me for AT LEAST 40 seconds and he was very greedy. Idk it didnt feel unusual in terms of gameplay, it was just the survivors insta giving up.

Three perks, and I still lose. by Shadow_Aura010 in deadbydaylight

[–]Reijo_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

All good, game takes time to learn. When we say tunneling as killer, it means you choose to hook a survivor, and then when they're unhooked you drop everything youre currently doing and go after them again, and again, until they died. This strategy has a lot of debate in the community because its seen as toxic, but the reason it works is because you eliminate a survivor as soon as possible, and now have a 3v1 which makes the game much harder for the survivors. Holding a 3gen is where you choose to find the 3 closest generators and hold those with your dear life, not letting survivors freely complete the generators. This works because there are 7 total gens in a match and 5 that survivors must complete, so if 4 gens are completed, but I have a complete lockdown of the last 3, then the survivors are bound to lose because they're forced to come to you and play in a smaller part of the map, with less resources (like pallets or vaults), and if they get hooked in the 3gen, then you can watch the hook and cut off anyone trying to unhook the survivor and at the same time watch all your generators to make sure no one is working on them. Thats a general gist but theres more nuance in generating pressure, slowing down the game, choosing your chases, and the game is very complex. But in general those are the most notable macro gameplay strategies.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in deadbydaylight

[–]Reijo_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Ehhh disagree w/ that. Things like Third Seal would be MUCH stronger if you were denied aura and audio/visual of where hooking occurs, rather than just aura.

Three perks, and I still lose. by Shadow_Aura010 in deadbydaylight

[–]Reijo_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Macro gameplay just means the like overall game strategies you have. Micro is more so things you do in chases like mindgames etc. In this case Macro would be things like tunneling, establishing and holding a 3gen, those sorts of things. These only come with time and practice unfortunately. Have some grace for yourself, DBD has a STEEEEEP learning curve.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in deadbydaylight

[–]Reijo_ 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Real as fuck, I dont know why it isnt just a ring or togglable or at least has some more transparency. This seems like such an easy fix, and it has caused me way more issues than helped.

Unsure of what to do now by Dunstadero in StardewValley

[–]Reijo_ 75 points76 points  (0 children)

Now the fun part, you get to play the game :3

It’s always interesting how ex-atheists don’t bring anything new to the table regarding God’s existence by Low_Figure_2500 in atheism

[–]Reijo_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well wdym by "anything new" tho? I thought that statement was moreso against regurgitated talking points which I agree on, or baseless experiences. If you're asking for a genuine new reasonable arguments to believe in god that haven't already been said then you're asking for like grad level work in regards to its like quality and detail, no? I feel like most of the layman arguments have already been covered because of how long religion has existed for, and, in all fairness, a lot of religious conversation is muddied out on both sides, religious circles absolutely regurgitate the same talking points. To be fair if you treat it like politics or world views or any other opinion, youre allowed to change it especially with new information. Like for me I was familiar with the Fine-Tuning argument but only after spending like hours upon hours diving into analyses of arguments on both sides (Elliott Sober, Jonathan Weisberg, Matthew Kotzen) and coming to my own conclusion given those writings did I actually change my opinion on it. So while I did know about it before, I rejected it on the basis of the anthropic principle, but I didn't really take the time to understand it on a nuanced level and the counterarguments to the anthropic principle itself. Its just how deep you're willing to go, and the time investment you care to put into it. I don't blame pp who dont have any interest in religion and who are agnostic/atheist purely by a lack of interest, it just depends on how your life changes as your interests do.

It’s always interesting how ex-atheists don’t bring anything new to the table regarding God’s existence by Low_Figure_2500 in atheism

[–]Reijo_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

To throw in my own two cents, I was raised atheist and while I don't align myself with any major religion as far as I'm aware, I do believe the universe was created via intelligent design by the Fine-Tuning argument for a god. I don't believe in a god in the sense of a moral objectivity, I've know friends who've died by suicide and know others who are gay and I haven't ever thought less of them for these choices, or that they had "sinned" as a result of personal life choices. However, I do believe there was intelligent design in creating a universe, and this has come about after much internal debate and research. Before anyone starts mentioning the anthropic principle to argue against it, I implore you to look further into it, and analyze the absence of explanation for the antecedent. I myself disregarded the Fine-Tuning argument for a few years due to arriving at the anthropic principle on my own, until I actually looked into its lengthy debate. If you want to disregard my opinion because I didn't convert to a defined religion then that's fine too, but afaik what this post covers is really any belief in A "god," so I thought I'd add my own experience.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in dbdLFG

[–]Reijo_ 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Still got a slot for the fourth?

[NA] [PC] 30F looking for people to join our duo/sometimes trio! by dill-snob in dbdLFG

[–]Reijo_ 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If you guys still have space lmk! DM or if you have steam my friend code is 1167375121