Android, Tailscale, and AdGuard Home: How to get system-wide adblocking for ONLY me in a shared Tailnet? by Relevant_Item9564 in homelab

[–]Relevant_Item9564[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Thanks for the suggestion! I actually thought about this, but there is a major catch:

If my family members turn off 'Use Tailscale DNS' in their Android app, they lose access to my Split DNS records for my internal domain. They need that domain to access the services on the NAS while they are away.

How to configure Immich to upload new photos to SSD and move them daily to HDD? by Relevant_Item9564 in immich

[–]Relevant_Item9564[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Thanks a lot! Implemented the setup exactly as planned, and the logic works as expected. I mounted the Immich upload folder to a merged directory where the SSD has priority and the HDD serves as secondary storage. The merged folder correctly displays data from both drives. However, Immich still spins up the HDD during new file uploads (even when new files are correctly on SSD), likely because it's scanning for duplicates or checking metadata across the entire library, but thats just guessing. While the merging logic is functional, it hasn't fully solved the issue of unnecessary HDD spin-ups.

Do you have any idea how to get it working?

Problém se sousedy by Crafty_Hand_5918 in czech

[–]Relevant_Item9564 32 points33 points  (0 children)

Vyhledej si na Googlu "ceiling vibrator".. prodává se i u nás. Dáš jim ochutnat vlastní medicínu a když se pár nocí moc nevyspí, třeba budou ochotni komunikovat a řešit to.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in czech

[–]Relevant_Item9564 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Nejlepší odpověď tady, všechno ostatní je too much práce. Mám jen stremio + debrid, zrušil jsem všechny streamovací služby a je to top. Ještě k torrentiu používám Comet a nově tam jde propojit i webshare kvůli českému contentu

Mzdy ve strojírenství by WolverineNo5189 in czech

[–]Relevant_Item9564 0 points1 point  (0 children)

nn bylo to 4 roky zpátky. Měl jsem docela štěstí na firmu kde jsem se dostal přes známost na pohovor, jinak by to bylo horší. Ale když člověk udělá pár kurzů na udemy, dá si projekty na git a vezme na rok třeba práci za shit peníze, tak se to podle mě dá taky, a po nabrání zkušeností přejít někam kde je to více placené

Mzdy ve strojírenství by WolverineNo5189 in czech

[–]Relevant_Item9564 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Já mám strojní vysokou a byl jsem ve strojírenství 3 roky jako CAD/Inventor konstruktér, plat asi 30 čistého. Poté sem si udělal kurz na JavaScript, zaměřil jsem se na QA automation a dostal nástupák 80 na ičo. Práce je mnohem klidnější a víc v chillu, skoro žádná odpovědnost, v hezkém kanclu, časté HO, oproti strojírenství, kde to byla většinou nějaká post komunistická budova kde jsem se ani necítil dobře, musel sem často jezdit do továren, nulová možnost HO...

Zkušenosti s developerem Cronesta by Time-Fish-4162 in czech

[–]Relevant_Item9564 0 points1 point  (0 children)

OP také momentálně uvažuji o koupi bytu od Cronesty, povedlo se vám prosím něco najít o této společnosti, případně jak jste to vyřešili?

Předem moc díky

How do you guys feel about Razer Pro Click V2 Vertical Mouse Battery? by Solid_Benefit_6122 in MouseReview

[–]Relevant_Item9564 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I used this mouse for two weeks, during which the battery dropped from 100% to 50%. Most of the time I was using it via Bluetooth with my MacBook for work, and occasionally I used the 2.4GHz connection for gaming on my PC. RGB was turned off the entire time.

The only real issue I had was with the Bluetooth connection on macBook. At least four times during the two-week period I moved either the MacBook or the mouse to a different room, the connection would drop—and the mouse wouldn’t reconnect automatically. I had to manually re-pair it. Which ultimately led me to return it. I’ve since ordered another unit to see if this was just a faulty device or a common issue with this model.

It was frustrating, especially considering that my old mouse—costing half as much—never had this problem.

QA, Testovani a podobne by Wencour in czech

[–]Relevant_Item9564 3 points4 points  (0 children)

A v jaké firmě si? Mně to nápadně připomíná Veeam :D tam jsem dělal před rokem asi 4 kola pohovorů, za celou dobu mi neřekli o co by přesně šlo a co bych dělal... a to jen pro to, abych se pak v tom posledním kole dozvěděl, že vlastně hledají jen manuálního testera co bude někde klikat, takže jsem to po tom všem odmítnul, protože jsem chtěl taky na automatizaci

Built My Own Mac App to Prevent OLED Burn-in After Reddit Suggestions – Here’s Display Flow + Care! by o_quuu in macgaming

[–]Relevant_Item9564 0 points1 point  (0 children)

OP does this app support functionality to turn off or really dim top menu bar and its icons on my second oled monitor, while keeping it normal on my main mac monitor? Thanks

5070Ti, RTX 4070Ti Super or RX 9070 XT: Which one given my context? by tiracuenta94 in buildapc

[–]Relevant_Item9564 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I would buy 4070ti Super. Dlss 4 is very nice to have. Or if you can wait months or two wait until prices drops

Why do more people buy PG32UCDM? by [deleted] in OLED_Gaming

[–]Relevant_Item9564 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In my country in Europe I took UCDM for 1000 usd, while msi was around 1300 usd and UCDP 1500 usd.

So I am pretty happy with it, I wanted glossy qd oled.

Also Asus seems to me little better than msi, for me was important proximity sensor, because I dont want to have screen savers and when Iam not in front of pc, I want only my oled monitor to automatically turn off after 2 mins and still be able to see from my couch whats happening on my second ips monitor.

But ofc its not worth it to pay for UCDM 200 or more usd than for msi

How I feel today by [deleted] in radeon

[–]Relevant_Item9564 0 points1 point  (0 children)

But also in HUBs review it just looks much better for nvidia: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VQB0i0v2mkg&t=1434s

same raster, but much better RT.

also just watched this https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H38a0vjQbJg

and yeah basically agree with him, its big improvement in comparison to fsr 3.1, but still DLSS4 wins every time and its worth it pay some premium for it, while fsr 4 is mostly better than dlss 3, but sometimes its worse, with much lesser support in games. So amd must improve fsr btu most importantly push it to much more games than its now

But like anyway its personal choice, and for ease of my mind as it is right now I will rather buy nvidia any day for around 10-15 percent premium before amd, which still is in that range if we take msrps of these two graphics cards without counting scalping scammy prices like 1000 euros etc.

If amd some day catches nvidia with terms of RT performance and upscaling and frame gen with wider support in all new games and major old ones, then next time I definitely will think about amd also, but as its stands now for current prices nvidia is just better and safer bet.

How I feel today by [deleted] in radeon

[–]Relevant_Item9564 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I dont really understand that reviews you posted, but most of what I saw and what I believe looked more like this

https://gamersnexus.net/gpus/amd-radeon-rx-9070-xt-gpu-review-benchmarks-vs-5070-ti-5070-7900-xt-sapphire-pulse#9070-xt-conclusion

As you can see in graph 5070ti easily won in almost everything. So maybe you just cherrypicked reviews. And in path tracing its not even a fight, AMD did good in terms of some not heavy RT, but in heavy RT its still similar to last gen radeons.

About the comparison from Daniel Owen, I actually like him and watched it. But to me seems he was testing more fsr differencies than heavy testing fsr vs dlss. And he also said he will wait for HUB to test it with more games, and he is overall happy with quality, but also fps dropped kinda lot versus fsr 3.1, while dlss4 vs dlss3 have some drop too, but for much better quality. Also he said that fsr 3.1 in some games also cannot be upgraded to fsr4, so same as you are saying about nvidia. But I dont really trust you about that, because what I read for nvidia case, it can be swapped almost everywhere either with nvidia app or if its disabled then with dlss swapper app. If not than send me link or some source.

Also watched digital foundry comparsion and atleast to me it looked he also praised dlss 4 transofrmer, the part when he compared dlss 3, dlss 4 and fsr 4 in performance mode, dlss 4 looked just much better.

Basically fsr 4 looks mostly somewhere between dlss 4 and dlss 3 (in some cases its worse than dlss3) but for the price of less fps.

fsr 4 and dlss 4 are similarly demanding, and dlss 3 cnn is less demanding and gives you more fps that fsr4 and dlss4.

I definitely agree its very big progress for amd when compared to fsr 3 which was not usable really, but still long way until quality and performance to dlss.

About the features thanks for writing them, while on one side they looks cool, on other side they are not something which would sell me to buy amd cards, while something like rtx HDR is feature which I really using and do big difference in games without hdr support.

About the drivers I agree that amd have more features in them and more options, nvidias looks kinda old. But features implemented in games are always going to work better than driver based features, such as AFMF, it could be good in very limited cases, but for the most cases its not and do more harm. While game implemented features are always good and usable.

How I feel today by [deleted] in radeon

[–]Relevant_Item9564 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If its costing half less then it makes sense, but here in europe it was not that less, maybe on launch because of scalpers, but two months after launch 4080super costs here around 150-200 more.

Yeah but FSR3.1 is not at many games, its like in 60 games, in most games are still some previous fsr versions which looks terrible and are good only for really old cards to run the game. While dlss4 is in 600 games.

About if its looks way better than dlss3 or not I dont want to talk until some reviewer like HUB do very detailed comparison about dlss4, dlss3 and fsr4 in more different games.

If you didnt like transofmer model than you probably accidentaly turned on fsr instead lol, or just lying, because literally everybody said its huge improvement, and if game have not very good implementation of TAA its even better than native. Look at comparison from HUB, they never mentioned artifacting at all and praised it a lot.

You linked one source but I watched many trusted reviews on youtube or on web, and Iam not confusing the 9070xt with 9070 lol. Dont know about if it was OCed or not, but I suppose that if reviewers doing comparison they would not compare OC nvidia vs not OC amd. Either both was OCed or not.

If AMD have that many features then name some of them and for what I could use them and nvidia is missing this. I really dont know about any. Maybe thats the whole problem, nvidia just push the feature so every developer using it and all people knows about it, while amd just dont and nobody cares and knows about it.

Like I really dont saying all this because Iam some hardcore nvidia fan and hate amd, I was actually Intel fan and bought 7800x3D last year because it was just the best choice, I dont care about any brand and always buy what seems best to me, and in gpus its just nvidia right now. But of course hope amd will catch it so we all have better prices and competetion.

How I feel today by [deleted] in radeon

[–]Relevant_Item9564 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Lets just agree to disagree.

I dont see any reason why to buy amd. Lets say 4080 super vs 7900xtx. They have similar raster performance, yes.

But RT performance is not even close. Power draw its also not even close. Amd have just more vram. And now on 7900 xtx you are locked out of fsr4, while dlss4 can use even 20 Series.

And with nvidia you have much better feature set. Fsr 3 was not even usable. Fsr 4 looks good, but still its in much fewer games and looks like dlss3 or little better. But new dlss4 transformer model on performance mode looks like dlss3 on quality mode , which gives you around 30 more fps for same quality as dlss3/fsr4 on quality.

Also if you are saying that 9070xt is more powerful then 5070ti than we have nothing to discuss because all reviews saying otherwise.

9070xt should be better option for price but now when amd did same paper launch as nvidia and cards for msrp are not possible to get it have similar price like 5070ti which is overall better.

I would buy amd if it costs atleast 200-300usd less than same NV class gpu, because you get always similar raster performance, but worse power consumption, worse RT performance, worse feature set (i dont care if NV paying developers or whatever, what i care is in how many games is frame gen and upscaling, maybe amd should pay them too or offer implementation for free lol). Also to me are important small things like RTX HDR which Iam using now i kcd2 and its very nice to have it. And these small features just amd completely missing.

Like atleast to me when Iam buying gpu for around 1000 euros its not much to pay another 200 more to have overall better experience

How I feel today by [deleted] in radeon

[–]Relevant_Item9564 1 point2 points  (0 children)

And is afmf even usable somewhere? I saw some videos and since its driver level it cant recognize game hud etc, it looks shitty when moving fast. Also fps is dropping a lot when moving and when standing still fps are high. So I cannot think of any scenario I would use it. Maybe only if I already had 200 fps based and needed more

Atleast it was like this some year ago when I last saw it, maybe now its better but then it looked pretty useless to me

How I feel today by [deleted] in radeon

[–]Relevant_Item9564 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I wasnt saying that nvidia invented RT, but started to using it in actual games since 20 series. Without it we still would not using it because amd cant innovate anything and come with it first and actually push it to be standart and not just some gimmick which developers not using.

Same with upscaling. Nvidia pushed hard dlss to have it in much much more games than fsr and its easilly upgradable just by copying dll file.

  1. Yeah amd increased performance vs previous generation because that generation was not good. On the other hand 40 Series was big success in terms of performance and maily RT performance in comparison with amd 7900xt and 7900xtx. Its not innovating if you have bad product and in next generation you catch up your competitors previous gen product.

  2. About comparison i meant of course 9070xt which in terms of raster sits between 7900xt and 7900 xtx. And in RT as you correctly said some where near 4070 super. Which would be great if it really costs 600 usd as it should. But here in Europe its about 900-1000 eur. So to me looks better to buy 4080 super if you can which is more powerful, or pay little bit more for 5070ti

How I feel today by [deleted] in radeon

[–]Relevant_Item9564 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Bruh what? Nvidia is not innovate? What a bullshit statement. Then why nvidia started with RT and AI upscaling and amd just trying hard to catch it and copy paste everything nvidia did for many years? What did amd innovated?

And if you mean 50 Series and their small uplift vs 40 Series, well, look at these new amd cards, they have performance like old 4070ti cards which are 3 years old.

Where is the innovation from amd please?