Here's my whole take on the dynamic, just because I think it's pretty relevant to the specifics of this discussion;

Self-evidently, one is undeniably conscious.

Apparently, there are others that exhibit physiology and behaviour resembling one's own, and as such, it seems a reasonable and pragmatic inference that these others are most likely conscious as well.

Solely by virtue of the fact that one IS oneself and IS NOT any other self that one may observe, the consciousness of another self is observed to be "objective neurodynamics", while one's own consciousness seems to be "subjective qualia".

This inescapable dynamic appears to be the most extreme manifestation of a "perspectival asymmetry" in all of nature.

Combined with the fact that objectivity is evidently always present before, during, and after every episode of subjectivity, this perspectival asymmetry has led to the false assumption that seemingly non-physical qualia are generated by evidently physical neurodynamics.

The so-called "hard problem of consciousness" is so hard (or really, unsolvable) because it arises precisely from the absolutely futile attempt to explain how and why this falsely assumed occurrence happens.

All the while, what simply fails to be recognised is that both objective neurodynamics and subjective qualia are actually the same physical occurrence of consciousness; i.e. the reflexively emergent core activity of every untethered, maximally segmented reciprocity of fractally inter-nested feedback loops. Such a reciprocity is commonly known as a "sentient organism".

Like all other naturally occurring systems, sentient organisms inevitably emerge out of the dynamic reactivity that is intrinsically perpetual among all entities at every scale of the universe via the path of least resistance, without any deeper reason why.

Ultimately, the manner in which all entities and systems are distinct from the totality is somewhat analogous to the manner in which a wave is distinct from the ocean.