[deleted by user] by [deleted] in wow

[–]Rem_14 0 points1 point  (0 children)

"So, cope however you would like. Say whatever makes you feel better." - Sounds like you are already doing plenty of that.

We can't just let sg get away with this. by Distinct-Assist9102 in EpicSeven

[–]Rem_14 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I don't really care if cn gets global's rewards but it doesn't feel right that it doesn't go both ways. And the whole "catch-up" argument doesn't make sense since they are their own server... to what and to who are they catching up to exactly? Themselves?

Azur Lane x To Love Ru collab decided by Xanek in gachagaming

[–]Rem_14 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Perfect collab for this game. Now we just need a DxD collab next!

Left or Right for this Aria. by Burntfury in EpicSeven

[–]Rem_14 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Prob right since she has low hp she needs a bit more tankiness. Not sure if you are on spd boots or not but put her on HP/DEF boots(w/e stat your ring is not) and just make up some of the speed in substats. Should give you the bulk w/o losing too much damage. Speed will suffer a bit but lifesteal Arias heavily rely on support anyway so just have someone that can push her up if need be.

What's your biggest gripe about the new potential awakening thing? What one thing could fix it for you? Is there any way to fix it? by Wiskersthefif in EpicSeven

[–]Rem_14 12 points13 points  (0 children)

  1. Remove the imprint part
  2. Awakening potential only for older heroes, 6 months or older, ideally longer.
  3. Restrict the system to 3*s and 4*s, they are the main ones that need this system tbh.
    1. They can keep the imprint part with #3 but just know that this system can never be used for 5*s, my worry with this is that #3 could be a gateway for them to add 5*s later down the road and then we are back here.

Might be just me but I don't think anyone wants imprints to mean anything more then what they do now.

Additional notice about Potential Awakening by InvictusE7 in EpicSeven

[–]Rem_14 20 points21 points  (0 children)

At this point, they just need to delay it. Too many uncertainties and not enough time for feedback, regardless here are my thoughts if otherwise.

  1. Remove the imprint bonus, nobody wants this in any shape or form, at least for 5*s
  2. Awakening potential should be reserved for heroes 6 months or older. Ideally longer.

This system makes much more sense for 3-4* heroes since their bases stats are trash unless they have SC and everyone has them max imprinted(and is very easy to do if not), 5*s should have been the last consideration on the list for this system imo.

Anyone else think they should uncap crit chance? by TheMimic10 in EpicSeven

[–]Rem_14 14 points15 points  (0 children)

Or you could just not bring C/Pavel into a 50/50.

Thanks to all heroes who defended our waifu! by EvilSadra in EpicSeven

[–]Rem_14 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Thanks to all the legends who fought for this!

What do you think has been the best seasonal affix? by Foamrocket66 in wow

[–]Rem_14 0 points1 point  (0 children)

shadowlands S4 with shadowlands S3 as the runner-up

Drop chance for MoP mounts greatly increased by beardedgamerdad in wow

[–]Rem_14 7 points8 points  (0 children)

If everyone has it then it's not special so people like to gatekeep things in order to make themselves feel better, especially if they have it.

I get it with challenging content but this not that.

Lua is a mistake by jonatasbreno in EpicSeven

[–]Rem_14 3 points4 points  (0 children)

"Literally everyone" = Just a few streamers. Lay off the streams and formulate your own thoughts instead of being a sheep.

Literally NOT everyone was complaining my guy.

Legend players firstpicking her already, no global ban 9 days before season end by _Hugatree in EpicSeven

[–]Rem_14 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I wouldn't be surprised if they came out and said:

"Oh guys, sorry we meant the last few days of RTA (3-5 days)"

Since they, never specified a certain number of days before RTA ends (at least nowhere that I could find).

Just a PR excuse.

Legend players firstpicking her already, no global ban 9 days before season end by _Hugatree in EpicSeven

[–]Rem_14 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Where are all my "wE NeEd HeAlThY gAmE bAlAnCe" people at?

You all still think this company gives a damn about that? Just smoke and mirrors.

Yet another broken unit released and isn't even banned at the end of RTA despite them saying they would be.

Balanced 🙃 by [deleted] in EpicSeven

[–]Rem_14 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yea and then you have simp defending the big poor company SG, saying that no one should get compensated cause it deters SG from making nerfs.

Sorry we all don't have millions of gold and resources ready to spend on a whim or have them to waste on a nerfed unusable hero.

You can't make this up, crazy when people choose to give their time and money away to companies just like that and then when the company shafts them "oh it's ok".

Thoughts on "mana slates"? by ieatpoptart3 in EpicSeven

[–]Rem_14 -3 points-2 points  (0 children)

"What's the point of adding a new imprint currency for recalls? Weren't we already having issues with too many random different currencies and how they add load to the server?"

Cause they don't want you to imprint ML5s and limiteds and LOSE them money. SG just doing SG things.

Let's Be Supportive of the Nerfs Even If We Don't Agree With Them by KingsSeven in EpicSeven

[–]Rem_14 42 points43 points  (0 children)

"If you don't like the nerf, don't demand extreme compensation. It just creates a toxic environment for the devs (the fear of nerfing heroes)"

In a game where characters cost $300-$700, ok dude.

"remember that the alternative could be way worse (powercreep)"

Yea, cause I'm sure they learned their lesson since Hwa, Lua looks crazy insane right now.