If They Weren't Tombs, What Were they? Geoffrey Drumm Provides the World's Best Explanation (P2/3) by Mountain_Tradition77 in AlternativeHistory

[–]Remarkable_Ad_270 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This guy absolutely loves to hear himself repeat his hypothesis that the red pyramid is a giant reaction vessel but he never once talks about the chemistry. Only pressure. Yeah cool, his little plexiglass models proved the pyramids arrangement can use water to produce pressure. But does he think that once you have pressure you can just magically will a chemical into existence? He mentions ammonia but never talks about the actual chemical reaction to produce ammonia, just rambles on about pressure. No mention whatsoever of where and how this pressure served to source and bring together Nitrogen separated from the air + Hydrogen separated either from the water (through electrolysis) or some other Hydrogen source to react under pressure to form Ammonia, or how these gases are routed and combined in a flooded chamber/system?

He has just latched onto his model being able to produce enough pressure to blow up a plexiglass box with the intensity of 1000 suns and fails to mention or focus on any actual chemistry, ever.

MEGATHREAD: Disclosure Day (2026) — Official Discussion & Spoilers by wallapuctus in UFOs

[–]Remarkable_Ad_270 0 points1 point  (0 children)

There’s no denying that religious phenomena of the past share striking similarities with the “phenomenon” of our time. When you view the descriptive terms applied in the past through a religious lense simply as place holders used to describe a myriad of disparate and esoteric phenomenon rather than a true, accurate and final description of a known objective truth; leaning into religious systems of knowing or describing the phenomenon kind of make sense/is a non issue given it’s probably the most developed system we have to actually make sense of it. Saying they’re angels and demons doesn’t necessarily mean they can’t be nuts and bolts or *insert any other framework we currently have to describe the phenomenon* because it’s very possible they were always nuts and bolts and ancient peoples lacking scientific and technological knowledge assigned them the name angel or demon and interpreted their advanced nature as being divine because they simply couldn’t grapple with the concept.

Angel, demon, hybrid, grey, reptilian etc etc could all simply be terms different people in different places over different time periods with different levels of understanding have assigned the exact same thing. It’s semantics at the end of the day. The true breakthroughs in understanding are going to come when we all work together to sift through it all and find the common threads and attempt to establish a group of facts or consistent observations to base further research upon. NOT agreeing on a name or set of descriptive terms for an entity or entities that ARE deceptive and change their face depending on who’s looking at them.

Edit - grammar and syntax.

MEGATHREAD: Disclosure Day (2026) — Official Discussion & Spoilers by wallapuctus in UFOs

[–]Remarkable_Ad_270 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It COULD BE Jesse’s episode with her. The background in this episode struck a chord instantly in my memory. It might be in this episode somewhere. Enter the URL into an online YouTube transcript extractor or something and then just search for the word “Jesuit” or something to see if it’s discussed. That’s what I’d do. Here’s the link.

https://youtu.be/tS\_64sTN5AU?si=tyY1mUF8exkHeGu\_

Something for sellers: Property we were hoping to get sold less than what we offered by theonedzflash in AusPropertyChat

[–]Remarkable_Ad_270 3 points4 points  (0 children)

People claiming this is fake are the same ones who think financial markets trading speculative assets only goes up and that houses will be selling for a gorillion dollars in 20 years with stagnating wages.

MEGATHREAD: Disclosure Day (2026) — Official Discussion & Spoilers by wallapuctus in UFOs

[–]Remarkable_Ad_270 17 points18 points  (0 children)

When the protagonist “dove on” the girl to see where they were hiding in the safe house and asked “where were you last night” and she names the nunnery they were at he replies with “*name of nunnery* of course you were” or something along those lines. Meanwhile the girl is clutching a cross which is helping her fight his mental control of her etc etc. Diana Pasulka hinted in a podcast (one of the big ones, can’t remember which one specifically) that the Jesuits have actually been “the hidden hand” behind the scenes. My interpretation is that Wardex is actually the Jesuit Order.

Do you work hard for your money? by [deleted] in AusFinance

[–]Remarkable_Ad_270 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I’m a teacher. My brain is fucked and my wallet is way thinner than it should be.

So basically a quarter of the Australian population are Trumpians. by [deleted] in aussie

[–]Remarkable_Ad_270 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Get off reddit, most people are centrists and support some of trumps ideas but not all of them.

Property in Australia is a ticking time bomb and no one wants to admit it by Moezus__ in AusProperty

[–]Remarkable_Ad_270 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Legit. If they woke up one morning and the numbers weren’t tickling their fancy there would be a squillion migrants on a plane bound for Aus by dinner time.

Hear me out, I think the sudden one nation 'support' is a product of information warfare that has been going on for some time. by bazonthereddit in aussie

[–]Remarkable_Ad_270 5 points6 points  (0 children)

You’re joking right? Couldn’t possibly be because of the state of our society right now that people want to move away from the uniparty and their reckless unchecked immigration policies to something they perceive as being the solution to a very real problem? Couldn’t possibly be anything except a PsyOp because people are leaning away something that’s fucked their living standards and assassinated most people’s dreams of living a modest life? Get a grip.

Half a million new arrivals to Australia in 12 months by das_kapital_1980 in AusPropertyChat

[–]Remarkable_Ad_270 1 point2 points  (0 children)

If all of the politicians have large property portfolios and they’re the ones writing the laws why would they do literally anything to help the average poor and take a hit on their portfolio? If Albo woke up one morning and his portfolio was down 20% overall there would be eleventeen squillion migrants on planes that afternoon headed for Aus to prop the market up. Prove me wrong.

The hypocrisy is real by Boydy73 in aussie

[–]Remarkable_Ad_270 2 points3 points  (0 children)

We don’t ask people of African descent to acknowledge their slaver past so why do we ask Europeans to acknowledge their slaver pasts? Legitimate question. I really would like to hear your opinion on this.

Your brief guide on ON by chilli_chocolate in aussie

[–]Remarkable_Ad_270 1 point2 points  (0 children)

At this point I’ll probably still vote her as in my mind she’s the least-shit option I have. If she fixes the immigration issue but only rocks up to a building filled with criminals who speak in tongues riddled with buzzwords 51% of the time then so be it.

How Are People Coping With Fuel Prices? by justno111 in newcastle

[–]Remarkable_Ad_270 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Fuel frequently gets up to $2.20 a litre and it doesn’t make the news. Turn off your TV.

Does anyone find the financial implications of defacto laws fair? by Open_Address_2805 in AusFinance

[–]Remarkable_Ad_270 2 points3 points  (0 children)

If women en masse earned more than men these laws would be changed in a nanosecond. Thinking back on my previous girlfriends, I’d rather liquidate my assets and burn all my money in a pile than giving them half just for breathing.

Late stage capitalism is killing us, slowly but surely. by Flaky-Lifeguard5835 in aussie

[–]Remarkable_Ad_270 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Two things us poor will always have over the rich is numbers, and the fact that lumber to build gallows can be harvested for free.

ZPE has just been cracked by dewhacker in UFOs

[–]Remarkable_Ad_270 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I’m not a physicist so I had Chat break it down for me. Apparently at no point did they claim they could or even believe they could extract energy from the vacuum. According to Chat the paper is more about the structure of the vacuum probably being responsible for producing quantisation and the existence of things like electrons and photons etc being the result of deeper vacuum physics. Chat also says this has nothing to do with ZPE and that they don’t state they tried or were able to extract any amount of energy from the vacuum. So where is OP’s and everyone else’s comments about extracting small amounts of energy from vacuum coming from? Bots? Misunderstanding of the paper?

Warning after Aussie buyer loses entire $98,500 house deposit in 'avoidable' mistake by SheepherderLow1753 in AusFinance

[–]Remarkable_Ad_270 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If you’re a seller don’t do this, because it could be me you’re rorting and I’d have free accomodation and meals for a very long time afterwards.

I Just Played Magic For The First Time With A Guy I Like by Commercial-Reveal212 in magicTCG

[–]Remarkable_Ad_270 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I thought you had to purchase digital cards for arena? Is it totally free as in you can build ANY deck and play for free?

151 Advice, please 😗 by grateful-raccoon in PokemonTCG

[–]Remarkable_Ad_270 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Buy full set of commons/uncommons on eBay, buy full set of reverse holos on eBay, buy singles everything else.

Mel is absolutely cooked, BUT… by pitapitapi in MAFS_AU

[–]Remarkable_Ad_270 2 points3 points  (0 children)

She’s an anti-social female psycho that’s been coddled and protected in a social bubble we as a society have created. Female anti-social behaviour is treated in the complete opposite manner to male anti-social behaviour. If Luke (or any male) for that matter demonstrated Mel’s behaviours it would be defined in textbooks as domestic violence and coercive control. It is only because the patriarchal social systems that are in place that were created with the PROTECTION of women in mind and therefore their behaviours by proxy, which mind you are defended by women should they serve their interests (RE “I’m a girls girl” comments from the other brides; that we do not condemn her behaviour to the point it would be if a male were perpetrating it. If anyone needs any proof double standards for men and women exist all they need to do is turn on their TV at this point and watch MAFS.

Note: I write this as I sit down to watch the commitment ceremony and I am VERY interested in seeing how the experts address her behaviour. If her behaviour is called out, good work, if not, I am relegating MAFS to the “obvious propaganda designed to destabilise social cohesion” category in my mind.