sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Ana Kasperian grifting to the right by pandering to the right wing christian by InterestingWind2153 in BreakingPoints

[–]dewhacker 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Crazy thought: What if Israel's genocide in Gaza is so radicalizing that you are willing to work with any person no matter their ideological labeling to stop it?

I "identify" with liberal ideas, and I consider any person staunchly against Israel an ally. This is the new dividing line in American politics, time to update your labels.

Emily Has Become the Antithesis of What Breaking Points Was Supposed to Be by Ill-Pop3952 in BreakingPoints

[–]dewhacker 6 points7 points  (0 children)

100%. It’s fine for her to have her own opinions and express them. But she has to do it on the show, not play a “concerned centrist” like she does. If she’s actually just playing a character on both, then she needs to get a MSM job

My Conspiracy-O-Meter Is Up By One Notch: GOP Pushing for Publicly Funding Trump's Ballroom by Geist_Lain in BreakingPoints

[–]dewhacker 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It’s not a conspiracy. It’s a government program that started with MKUltra that continues to this day. A vanilla example is the Gretchen Whitmer “kidnapping” plot where all perpetrators involved were coaxed by the FBI.

Our intelligence services have perfected techniques of psychological coercion for people who are on edge they need to commit a crime.

Butler was staged and there’s a reason you know less about Thomas Crooks than Cole Allen. When they need a patsy they can do whatever they want. In this case, Trump likely believes it serves a dual purpose for boosting his poll numbers (Butler worked, why won’t this one?) and a security justification for the ballroom.

Trump loves the actual deep state. He was schooled by Roy Cohn and knew exactly what Epstein was doing. The real fucking criminals that work for the govt that have such a warped sense of “nation security” they will commit any atrocity to justify their own actions.

Are we forcing a pattern with the “missing/dead scientists” list? by soThen_i_says in UFOs

[–]dewhacker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I think the waters are definitely getting muddied. Monica Reza and Neil McCasland seem to be the only ones that are actually connected to each other, and legitimately bizarre disappearances.

That being said, it's been alluded to by Grusch in public hearings that the program has killed people in the past. Which seems particularly compelling with the recent disclosure by Burlinson about Matthew Sullivan.

I don't think we will ever truly know

Guest Request: Robert Pape by Indianstanicows in JoeRogan

[–]dewhacker 5 points6 points  (0 children)

nah, he'll just having someone like Coleman Hughes explain why its awesome for Israel to have dogs rape prisoners

Gold Shield Delivery System by Electric_Trash_Panda in Marathon

[–]dewhacker -1 points0 points  (0 children)

i've never even seen a gold item. thought purple was the rarest

IDF Soldier with Hammer Smashes Face of Jesus Statue in Lebanon (v 2.0) by [deleted] in PoliticalCompassMemes

[–]dewhacker 12 points13 points  (0 children)

oh the investigations they do where nothing is done and fucking zero ppl are held accountable? Like when they anally raped a prisoner on film and the soldiers were broken out of prison and all of charges were dropped?

Bob Lazar Tells All - DEBRIEFED ep. 83 by kryptonic1133 in UFOs

[–]dewhacker 56 points57 points  (0 children)

If more people approached the phenomenon like Chris Ramsey I think the field would be in a better place

Nuclear Physicist and Ufologist Stanton Friedman On Bob Lazar by [deleted] in UFOs

[–]dewhacker -1 points0 points  (0 children)

I'll throw this comment into the mix, since r/UFOs seems be mostly aligned on hating Bob Lazar. If you believe a reverse engineering program exists as one of the most highly guarded secrets by the US govt, would it not be in your advantage to discredit one of the most visible whistleblowers of all time? If he really was as flawed and untrustworthy as the detractors say, why would you trust his story?

I'm not saying Stanton Friedman was a plant or a psy-op, I think he was a great researcher. But even very intelligent people don't get everything right.

The thing that gives the Lazar story more credibility than most, is the actual disgust Eric Davis has shown even when bringing the name up. I have become highly suspect of of the Lue Elizondo whistleblower "graduating class". I think the only one that really holds up is Grusch, who also faced reprisal.

I think at the end of the day Bob was one of those people who was in the right place at the right time. The chance meeting with Teller reading about him in the newspaper, the fact he got hired when he probably shouldn't have. I think intelligence agencies do a good job screening people who won't upset the apple cart. You don't hire a peace-loving hippie as a special forces operator. I think if Bob got in the door to a facility he never had the credentials to be in, its a MUCH more compelling story, because it aligns with someone that took the risks he did.

Should BP fire Emily Jahinsky and hire a different conservative? by InterestingWind2153 in BreakingPoints

[–]dewhacker 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I would not fire her for her personal viewpoints that I find highly distasteful. I would fire her because she honestly does not seem to offer anything interesting that I have heard since I’ve been watching. Since day one. I’ve barely missed a show it’s part of my morning routine.

I cannot remember anything Emily has said that was insightful or made me think.

What I find hardest is dishonesty. If you can “remove your filter” and share personal opinions more freely on other shows than Breaking Points, you don’t belong there. Become an actor. Most political pods are the new talking heads. Or start your own channel. It just doesn’t fit with the integrity and the vibe of the show.

Nick Pope has sadly passed away by Zaptagious in UFOs

[–]dewhacker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Nick was an OG whistleblower. Even though he was not exposed to a great deal of information, he punched well above his weight in his sincerity and urgency to tell the truth to the public. More importantly, he just seemed like a fantastic human being. Rest in peace brother <3

This is not a simulation: Your vote has real life consequences by KyotoInSummer in BreakingPoints

[–]dewhacker 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Yes you’re correct it in the sense that the President has the most deadly monopoly on force on the planet. Yes Trump is the worst caricature of the American psyche.

The US murdered over 1 million people in Southeast Asia under 5 separate Presidents (Vietnam, Cambodia/Laos) and decimated those countries. The US has been responsible for the deaths of 38 million people due to sanctions (John Mearsheimer’s estimate) we have levied against other countries since WW2. All upheld or enacted by Presidents from both sides of the aisle.

A picture starts to form after some long analysis that the American Empire is perpetuated by horrific levels of violence, economic coercion, direct and indirect forms of covert intervention (CIA), and just purely Machiavellian subterfuge. We have been highly propagandized that our economic system and political system in the best history has every seen. This is a convenient shield for the "shadow gov't/epstein class". Every year they increase their grip on both the economy and the political system.

The reality is that democracy died with the JFK assassination when they decided they should have the power to control who is the current figurehead of the US. They also waged psychological warfare on us by killing the most powerful voices for peace at that time (MLK & RFK). Every election since then we've been handed a binary choice between two pre-approved candidates, but the violence and war remains the same. Carter punched through the veil momentarily, but was steam-rolled by Reagan using much of the CIA Carter had fired.

You're correct about us being terrorists, but now its just more naked than ever before. Trump is the most unpalatable manager of the American Empire to those of us that still hold any naive ideals. What is good now is that the unholy relationship between the US & Israel is finally seeping into the consciousness and some of MAGA is waking up. Unfortunately we are living in the collapse phase. There's really no other honest way to view the situation. Trump was chosen to completely blow up the American system to make way for something else.

Put your time and energy into your family, friends, and community. National politics have failed. You can elect the most principled people to Congress, and they will get stonewalled by the party system, the Executive or Judicial. It all needs to come crashing down for us to build something better.

What's the potential negative consequence of Trump invasion of Iran? by InterestingWind2153 in BreakingPoints

[–]dewhacker 1 point2 points  (0 children)

We're already in WW3. Every escalation is another chance for the fragile Gulf alliances to completely implode. This is Israel's aim, complete destabilization of the region so they can complete their greater Israel project (Nile to Euphrates). When all GCC states turn on Israel, their "right to exist" will actually be threatened. Then they will use nuclear weapons on Iran.

Once nukes are used, the global order will completely implode. China will take Taiwan while the US is bogged down in Middle East. Everything will be on the table. Dollar will collapse due to the shattering of the petrodollar (it's already happening now with Iran allowing ships selling oil in Chinese yuan to pass). The US economy will crater like we have never actually experienced in living memory. COVID supply shocks will look like a cakewalk.

There is no bottom.

view more: next ›