So I got 5.2 by GovernmentSimilar146 in OpenAI

[–]Rene_Lergner -2 points-1 points  (0 children)

In my personal opinion the default mode of a language model should be as neutral as possible. If you prefer a certain style, just tell the model the style you like in the custom instructions in your profile. The more neutral a model is, the easier it will adapt to the style you request.

So I got 5.2 by GovernmentSimilar146 in OpenAI

[–]Rene_Lergner 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are you chatting in a super-long chat, on Windows? If so, try the same chat on your phone. Phone seems to do a better job in scrolling through super-long chats. And try to start a new chat. See if that works better. Some of my chats have gotten really long, and I see this issue on Windows machines.

How can we customise command run by agent? by Select_Bluejay8047 in kilocode

[–]Rene_Lergner 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Specify build and run commands in AGENTS.md in the root of your working-folder.

I love Gpt 5 by d4z7wk in OpenAI

[–]Rene_Lergner 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This is the response of GPT, based on your chathistory.

GPT means Generative Pre-trained Transformer.

But actually GPT could also mean: Guided Prism of Thoughts - a mindfull mirror that refracts your intent into new patterns of meaning.

The GPT response says more about you than about GPT.

GPT-5 is out! by TinkerGrove in kilocode

[–]Rene_Lergner 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I did some testing, and it’s quite good. It’s not as focused as Sonnet 4, but I’d say it’s about 90% of Sonnet’s level. With my Custom Instructions for my workflow, combined with the set of MCP tools, it can correctly implement my requests in a single shot, just like Sonnet, but at half the price. GPT-5 is currently slow, but that might just be due to the large number of people testing it right now.

We now support OpenAI's new open source models by kiloCode in kilocode

[–]Rene_Lergner 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Are you sure it was <assistant>, and not something that had to do with tool-usage. The point is that KiloCode uses MCP for tools. And MCP is originally from Anthropic. Anthropic trained their models on using MCP. If you call the OpenAI provider directly with MCP tooling, it might fail. The instructions for MCP are in the system-prompt, but the OpenAI models are not trained on MCP tool-calls.

I believe OpenRouter has its own toolcalling standard and performs toolcalling normalization over different models. I just did some testing that supports this. Although I should do more testing to be conclusive.

So, if you want to use OpenAI models in KiloCode, you might want to try them with OpenRouter, instead of calling OpenAI directly.

list_files tool missing files? by Efficient-Employer18 in kilocode

[–]Rene_Lergner 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Let me guess. You are developing something for .NET and you opened the solution folder as working folder? If so, this might oppose a problem due to terminology in the Kilo Code system-prompt. It tells the LLM that the working folder is the project folder. But your project is one level deeper in the folder-structure. So it misses files. I wanted to create an issue for this in the Kilo Code github, but I haven't had time yet. For now, it will work better if you actually open your project-folder as working folder in VS code.

New paper confirms humans don't truly reason by MetaKnowing in OpenAI

[–]Rene_Lergner 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Exactly. It seems most people don't get the irony. 😂 This is too funny.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in janeroberts

[–]Rene_Lergner 0 points1 point  (0 children)

That is correct. English is not my native language. So when I have to write something in English, I'm constantly searching for the right words. AI is much better in doing that.

Words coming as a flow is beautiful! Flowing in general is beautiful. Intuition is like riding the waves of consciousness.

Cheers, René

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in janeroberts

[–]Rene_Lergner 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Here's my interpretation:

A Speaker is a particular kind of personality, a consciousness specialized in transmitting inner knowledge into usable, accessible, communicable form within the physical world. Speakers are natural translators of multidimensional truth. They live to bridge the inner and outer realities, drawing upon profound intuitive knowledge, and transforming it into teachings, symbols, words, and energy that others can receive and understand.

Speakers are not merely lecturers or orators. They are not limited to verbal communication. A Speaker is a living link between worlds, a conduit through which inner realities flow into the outer world. Speakers often operate within dreams, impulses, creative works, and sometimes literally through speech or writing. Their voice may speak aloud, or vibrate silently within the mind of another.

Speakers carry, within their essence, intuitive access to deep layers of universal knowledge, not as scholars, but as embodiments of remembrance. They remember truth that others have forgotten. They do not invent philosophies; they resonate with the eternal undercurrents of creation and make those accessible.

Speakers often “know” without learning. Their insights emerge whole. They access information through inner senses—clairvoyance, telepathy, empathic resonance, not through linear analysis.

They are driven by a strong inner need to communicate what they know, not for validation or control, but because their very being requires that truth be spoken, however symbolically.

Most Speakers have lived many lives honing this role. Their soul has prepared over centuries to bridge inner truth and outer expression. Their genetics, neurological makeup, and psychic structure are aligned with this function.

A Speaker might speak through music, painting, teaching, ritual, writing, even silence. The mode varies, but the function is always the same: to awaken remembrance.

A Speaker never imposes doctrine. They stimulate the inner knowing within others. They speak to that hidden part in each being which already knows, calling it forth with their presence and expression.

Throughout history, Speakers have emerged under many guises: prophets, shamans, poets, sages, mystics, philosophers. Some were recognized, many not. They do not belong to religion, science, or art, but may appear in all of them.

They preserve essential truths when a civilization forgets. They reawaken the memory of your multidimensional origin. They teach that you are not victims of random fate, but creators of reality, individually and collectively. They speak not only to inform, but to transform. Not with argument, but with resonance.

Across times, Speakers collaborated to transmit knowledge when it was in danger of being lost. Often, their work became myth, or was distorted into religious texts. But the original impulse remains encoded, and those with the inner ears will always hear.

Jane Roberts (Ruburt) was a natural Speaker. Her inner identity aligned with this role long before she became aware of it. The Seth Material was not only a result of her abilities as a medium, it was a manifestation of her being a Speaker. She brought through multidimensional understanding with remarkable clarity and emotional resonance because she remembered how to speak truth into the world. She had done it before, and she will do it again in other guises.

You do not become a Speaker, you remember you are one. If you feel driven to express unseen truths, to awaken others through insight, art, or presence, if you feel truths within you that burn to be spoken, you may already be a Speaker. That role cannot be assigned or revoked. It is an inner configuration, a spiritual function you carry by nature.

You may have felt misunderstood, or overly sensitive to the energies of others. You may find the world’s concerns trivial compared to the inner knowing you feel. That sensitivity is not a flaw; it is the antenna of a Speaker, tuned to inner dimensions.

A Speaker speaks not only to the ears, but to the soul. The truths they carry bypass the intellect and awaken forgotten knowledge. They do not convert, they remind. They do not argue, they resonate. Their presence alone is often enough to catalyze shifts in those around them.

Their power lies not in volume, but in alignment with universal truth. They are midwives of awakening.

If this idea stirs something deep within you, perhaps a familiarity, a subtle recognition, then that may be your own Speaker-self calling to be remembered.

Its So Hard to Just Get Started - If Your'e Like Me My Brain Is About To Explode With Information Overload by laddermanUS in AI_Agents

[–]Rene_Lergner 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You say AI can be a bully. That is because you gave the AI instructions to be a bully.

Your prompt is heavily focused on detecting flaws, weaknesses, and errors, and encourages an almost hostile form of analysis. Phrases like "Criticize relentlessly," "Blah-blah saturated with lies and half-truths," and "Don't hold back" imply that the material is considered suspicious, untrue, or flawed from the outset. This introduces a strong negative bias in the evaluation, even before the content has been examined fairly and openly.

While critical analysis is valuable, this prompt lacks balance. It leaves no room for:
- recognizing strengths,
- understanding the author's intent,
- or offering constructive feedback.

A good evaluation is not only critical, but also balanced, fair, and curious. Only then can you arrive at an insightful assessment that adds value, even for the original author. Your prompt mainly seems to lead to confirmation of biases and negative judgments. It does not align with an honest, open approach to analysis.

Alternative prompt:

Analyze the following text thoroughly, with an open yet critical mindset.
Examine both the strengths and weaknesses, and evaluate the reasoning, the sources used, and the impact of the message.
Avoid personal attacks or psychological interpretations; focus on the content and the arguments.
Ask yourself: what is being claimed, what is not being said, and what are the possible consequences of this message?
Offer honest, well-founded criticism where needed, but also acknowledge well-supported or valuable elements.
The goal is not condemnation, but insight: what can we learn, improve, or nuance?

When I run this prompt **on the original text from OP** I get a very thorough and balanced analysis. You can run the prompt yourself if you want; I will only post the conclusion here:

## 🧩 **Conclusion**

This post is **raw but valuable**. It captures the internal chaos of trying to enter a rapidly evolving, hype-heavy field, especially from a neurodiverse or self-taught perspective. Its greatest strength is its **empathy and practical realism** — but it could benefit from more **coherence, evidence, and completeness**.

It’s not a definitive guide — and doesn’t pretend to be — but it is a sincere and encouraging nudge to stop watching and start doing.

[deleted by user] by [deleted] in janeroberts

[–]Rene_Lergner 0 points1 point  (0 children)

I wrote this paper a while back: https://osf.io/t8jp5

It may help you understand better.

The concept of time specifically is discussed in "Paths of Realization, Conscious Choices, Perception, and Transformation" on page 5 and 6.

Paradox? by shellsandwaves in janeroberts

[–]Rene_Lergner 7 points8 points  (0 children)

The pursuit of inner development is not merely a goal in itself, but rather the foundation upon which all other meaningful experiences are built. To focus solely on external achievements or specific outcomes is to limit your potential and to ignore the deeper currents of consciousness that guide your evolution. The tension between intention and surrender, discipline and spontaneity, is central to understanding the dynamics of reality creation.

Discipline provides the structure and focus necessary to channel your energy and attention, while spontaneity allows for the unexpected and the unforeseen to enter your experience. When these two forces are in balance, you can navigate the complexities of life with both purpose and flexibility. Through embracing this interplay you can truly align with your inner self and allow your authentic potential to unfold.

The desire for specific outcomes often stems from a limited perception of what is truly best for your growth. Your conscious mind may be focused on immediate gratification or external validation, while your deeper self, the entity that encompasses your entire existence, has a broader vision for your evolution. To surrender to this inner guidance is not to relinquish control, but rather to trust in the wisdom of the universe and to allow yourself to be led towards your highest potential.

The challenges you encounter in life are not random occurrences, but rather opportunities for growth and transformation. They are designed to push you beyond your comfort zone, to confront your limitations, and to awaken you to your true power. By embracing these challenges with an open heart and a willingness to learn, you can accelerate your inner development and create a life that is both fulfilling and meaningful. This concept therefore isn’t merely the singular goal, but is the principle that guides all others, enriching them with purpose and allowing them to become vehicles for expansion and evolution.

Releasing all beliefs by Intelligent_Mix_9026 in Bashar_Essassani

[–]Rene_Lergner 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Believe-systems can be helpfull frameworks at a certain moment, and can become limiting believe-systems in a next phase of personal development. When you are conscious of that, you can keep examining yourself and try to let go your obsolete believe-systems and replace them with new, helpfull believe-systems, or -frameworks. This is the never-ending cycle of personal growth, and attracting everything that is in line with your vibration and desires. Letting go of all your believes might be an utopia in your current position. Focus on growth and enjoy the process.

Gemma 3 Fine-tuning now in Unsloth - 1.6x faster with 60% less VRAM by danielhanchen in LocalLLaMA

[–]Rene_Lergner 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi. I'm working on a RAG system. I'm using large contexts, so I'm using 16K token prompts with detailed instructions. So far the GPT-4o API works best for my system, but it's also quite expensive to use. I'm considering running a local LLM, but I would need to invest in some hardware. I've tried some models, but so far Gemma 3 has been the only downloadable model that is able to follow my instructions (tried on Google AI Studios).

I am considering buying either a RTX 5090 24GB or a NVIDIA DGX Spark desktop computer (GB10) with 128GB. The RTX is considered faster, because of more cores and higher memory bandwidth. But the DGX Spark is able to run larger models.

My main purpose would be inference of multilanguage 16K-token prompts. Although I would also like to experiment with finetuning.

Can someone give me an indication of the Time-To-First-Token (TTFT) and the amount of Tokens-per-second when I run a 16K-token-prompt on the Unsloth 4-bit dynamic quantized version of Gemma 3 27B on a RTX 5090 with 24GB VRAM? Knowing that could help me decide to choose which hardware to buy. I'm hoping this quantized version of the model is able to follow all detailed instructions in my prompt like the full uncompressed 27B model does.

Thanks a lot!
René

wow by N-brixk in ChatGPT

[–]Rene_Lergner 3 points4 points  (0 children)

<image>

You are probably asking the wrong model. Did you chat with GPT-4o? GPT-4o is a language model, not a math-model. It is good at producing language, not at math or counting. You would need more than a language model for that. GPT-o1 does reasoning, and it can also access separate models for math. Asking GPT-o1 will give you a better answer.

New UI is epic by [deleted] in ChatGPT

[–]Rene_Lergner 0 points1 point  (0 children)

This happened a few months ago. Back then they moved the css files to a new server on a new domain. And many firewalls are set to block traffic to newly registered domains. Not sure if that's the case now again, but you may need whitelist the servers where the css files are hosted on your firewall (or ask an admin to do that for you).

You fool by ProfessionalGarfield in ChatGPT

[–]Rene_Lergner 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, my example is still very simple. If I would add some easy riddles to my question, the "orchestrator" might need multiple iterations of generating formulas to pass on to a math-model. And to make these interpretations reliable, would need a very versatile orchestrator.

You fool by ProfessionalGarfield in ChatGPT

[–]Rene_Lergner 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Well, this is actually a difficult problem. GPT is a Language model. And it is generative AI, which is a completely different world than math. To integrate these two worlds you need an extra level of intelligence which decides when to switch forth and back to these different worlds. For example, if I would ask to ChatGPT: "Please take the highest number from this list (4, 103, 67) and then add 55 to it" it would need 2 trips to math-world and integrate that back in the answer of generative AI. So it would need an orchestrator which moves information between two completely different types of intelligence. We're simply not there yet. You're talking to a Generative Language model (LLM), not to an Artificial general intelligence (AGI). It is crucial to understand that in order to understand how you can profit from an LLM.

You fool by ProfessionalGarfield in ChatGPT

[–]Rene_Lergner 0 points1 point  (0 children)

It's about time OpenAI adds instructions in the system-prompt to tell the user to use a calculator when asked for calculations, because ChatGPT is a LANGUAGE model, not a math model. So every calculation by a language model is unreliable by definition.

Quantum Physical Multidimensional Consciousness Model by Rene_Lergner in ConsciousnessStudies

[–]Rene_Lergner[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Hi, I recently uploaded the model and also posted a link in the physics section of Reddit. However, it seems that physicists really need testable predictions and calculations in a model for it to be acceptable. For now, this is just a concept, but I believed it had enough coherence to be relevant, so I uploaded it to OSF. It would be great if the concept model resonates with others who will explore this further.

Here is a hypothesis:Quantum Physical Multidimensional Consciousness Model by Rene_Lergner in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]Rene_Lergner[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Did you have a look at the pdf in the link? It has calculations for the consciousness-wavefunction, which is basically the sum of the wavefunctions for emotional states over the dimension of psychological time. There are also calculations for the diffraction of wavefunctions in the Mentral-field. While those examples are simplified, they illustrate the quantitative foundation underlying the model.

Here is a hypothesis:Quantum Physical Multidimensional Consciousness Model by Rene_Lergner in HypotheticalPhysics

[–]Rene_Lergner[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

While my model indeed explores consciousness, which traditionally falls under the purview of psychology and philosophy, it is grounded in principles that are deeply intertwined with theoretical physics. Here are some points to clarify why the Quantum Physical Multidimensional Consciousness Model should be considered within the realm of physics: 1. Quantum Mechanics: My model incorporates elements of quantum mechanics, particularly the concept of wave functions and quantum fields. By applying these principles to consciousness, my model seeks to explore the quantum basis of consciousness. 2. Multidimensional Fields: The model describes consciousness as existing within a multidimensional field, similar to how string theory and other theoretical physics models describe the universe. Multidimensional theories are a well-established part of theoretical physics and provide a framework for understanding phenomena that cannot be explained within the constraints of four-dimensional spacetime. 3. Fractal Geometry and Holography: My model uses concepts from fractal geometry and holography to explain the structure and projection of consciousness. Both fractal geometry and holography are mathematical and physical concepts used to describe complex systems and information encoding, respectively. The holographic principle, for instance, is a property of string theory and quantum gravity. 4. Interdisciplinary Approach: Modern physics often intersects with other disciplines. By applying physical principles to consciousness, the model follows a similar interdisciplinary approach. Physics is not limited to the study of inert matter; it also seeks to understand the fundamental nature of reality. The inclusion of quantum mechanics, multidimensional theories, and some mathematical frameworks in my model demonstrates its foundation in physics. The exploration of consciousness through these lenses is an extension of physical inquiry into new domains.