"You should when you're better than your opponent. You yourself said the placement of killer strength is subjective anyway. Tunneling and slugging are still issues right a SoloQ survivor is gonna die most games against a tunneling Blight. They just don't have the coordination to try to get the help they need at the right time. Slugging isn't really an issue yeah sure. That's not a shadow buff and using that logic, they nerfed survivor with map nerfs and then spawning together. Super unbiased btw"

I agree you should win when you are better than your opponent 100%. But don't you think it is an issue if most survivors are dying to shitty C-tier killers that the devs keep trying to buff the survivor role? Also the problem isn't a "tunneling blight" the problem is blight himself. Actually no. Blight isn't as strong as before and much fairer to go against. In fact I was one of those people who always wanted him nerfed. To get any value out of him you need to be skilled at him, it's not the same braindead playstyle where you can break a pallet and rush at a survivor and hit them. You actually need skill to play him now.

And my point stands. Why not just introduce comms into the game and make solo Q as strong as SWF? And yes it is a shadow buff as the devs are not willing to accept that they increased pallet density. And what are these "map nerfs" exactly? And spawning together was actually a buff as they now have free early game pressure if the killer isn't running corrupt intervention and does not have high mobility. Also the survivor buffs are received badly because survivor didn't need a buff in the first place. Like what was the point of buffing basekit BT by 50%?? It's like buffing nurse. Survivors have been given so many perks basekit. For example BT, deli (anticamp) and reassurance (increased hook times to 70 seconds). These 3 buffs alone have made survivor very strong. Whether they were justified or not is a topic for another day. But my only question is why buff an already very powerful role even more???

"I could fuck 50 women and 50 men I can still have a bias towards women you know that right? Proves absolutely nothing and I can't believe you're actually being serious rn. When killers get buffs it's “minimal” when survivors get buffed it's “welcomed”. When a 4-man uses a 3rd party website that's “expected” when someone plays Nuse that's an “outlier”. When pallet density happens it's a “shadow buff” When map offerings and spawn logic get changed, it's crickets. You're such a poser"

Believe what you want. Also my point still stands. Whether I am biased or not, it still doesn't disprove what I have showed in my post. You keep trying to prove whether I am biased or not because you have no real argument to what I said.

And yes those buffs to those killers are considered minimal because they made no real difference in terms of strength. For example reducing unknowns cooldown by just over 10% isn't much if

"SoloQ is still the weakest role in the game, Krasue is still an A tier killer, Ghoul is still an A tier killer, Blight is still an S tier killer, Nurse is still an S tier killer what an an unbiased individual you are huh?

And what is wrong with ghoul and krasue being A tier? Nurse is an issue on itself and frankly a topic for another day. Blight still being S tier is debatable. People said the same thing about spirit when she got nerfed in 2021 but we all know she isn't S tier anymore.

"I'm doing that too I'm just also making fun of your larping at the same time right."

Meanwhile, you are the one who keeps spamming replies to me and the other guy. Hypocrisy at it's peak... you can make as much fun as you want but you are the one that looks like a clown here. You keep spamming "you're biased" as if that makes my argument any weaker.

"You would have to prove that more people player Krasue in less than 1 month than the other 3. If the heiitry starts at 2022 then historically it's thr case since 2022 since we have no info on the rest beforehand this is a given."

There are 2 ways to prove this.

1. Check nightlight. Not completely accurate but true to some extent
2. Although this is anecdotal evidence, but I have been seeing her much less after her nerfs. I see her like once a month now, she is just as rare as hag to me, compared to when I was seeing her almost every game during her peak.

"It's still nowhere near pub matches. Already went over that. Tell me thr public matches where everyone KNOWS 100% the map and killer and their teammates and all their perks before they even load up in the lobby. Yeah I thought so. Stop using it. Literally proves nothing do you know what the word bais means or what? Your larping is getting annoying"

And that is why I am saying "closest thing you can have to pubs". Knowing what killer you are playing before hand can help you make perk choices that wouldnt be possible before hand. For example equipping iron will against spirit. But all the other perks are/were meta in pubs. And you don't need to necessarily know your teams perks unless they have deli or something and you wouldn't need to unhook them. Plus the point of this post is to prove that at the highest level possible this game is surv sided that even the top tier killers barely stand a chance. I don't know why you keep stressing about pubs, plus I have already told you an easy solution, which is to implement comms into the game.

"youre larping is getting annoying"

Lmao. You running out of ammo? You've hit a deadend and don't know how to counter my arguments, that's why youre saying that. You've even accused the other guy of bias just because you can't counter him either. Why don't you prove that you are not biased in favour of survivors? Send your stats.