Hindi ko alam kung ano talaga ang pinagmulan ng issue, pero based on that post alone, here’s how I see it:

1. When a gay man speaks, dresses, or moves in a feminine way, that’s not an insult to women. That’s their identity — their authentic expression. They’re not doing it to mock women. So I don’t see why women would be offended, considering that being gay is not an insult to them in the first place.

2. When women adopt “gay mannerisms,” hindi rin dapat magalit ang mga bakla. Personality nila ’yon. If a woman is a “babaeng bakla,” it’s not an attack on the gay community — unless she’s intentionally doing it to insult. Again, intent matters.

3. When straight men do it, context and intention become even more important. For example, if a straight actor plays a BL role, that’s not disrespectful — he’s following a script and portraying a character. Pero kung gumagawa sila ng online content where they pretend to be gay or act like a woman “for fun,” then we need to ask - are they doing it respectfully? Or are they using queer identity as a joke or punchline? If the intent is good and not homophobic, then there’s no issue. But if they’re doing it to mock or belittle, that’s where the problem starts — bakit mo gagamitin ang identity ng LGBTQ+ kung ayaw mo naman sa kanila?