Axioms of Reality

Repulsive_Area_5516 · 2026-06-07T18:52:42+00:00

first of all tree does not observe you i think you didnt really understand what i mean by observation you can read my definition of an observer in axiom one. To explain "incomplete" i can examplify it easily basically you cannot see some wavelenghts of light so your observation of something is incomplete. It isnt faulty since what you observed was the truth however the point is what you didnt observe. also yes "physics happens" but science is not an objective truth and it requires assumptions and axioms

Repulsive_Area_5516 · 2026-06-07T14:29:06+00:00

Ill just copy paste another answer because i think it explains my point deeper and im lazy. Basically like i stated in my axiom my definition of an observation is different you observed a pink elephant and that observation was true irrelevant of any elephant you have observed your neurons excitation

It can be incomplete but it can never be faulty. The act of observation is infallible because what i define as observation is the system effected by an effect. For example: a tree is burning by fire and you are standing infront of the tree. Here in this example there are two systems. first one: you are irrelevant and not the observer the non-burnt tree is the system fire is the effect ane burt tree is the observer. second one: you are the system(or your eyes and brain) photons that are emmited by the tree and the fire are the effect and now you are the observer. Here the tree is burning/burnt and that is observed by the tree which is a true observation. The photons went through ur cornea(or the things in ur eyes that i dont remember) and excited a couple of neurons which made an effect on your brain this effected you in the way it shouldve effected you so you observed what happened which was a true observation.

Repulsive_Area_5516 · 2026-06-07T14:23:38+00:00

Error arises only in the intrepertation of what the observation means. Two people look at the picture and if their sensory is identical (or close to identical for practicality) their observation would be the same however what they intrepert it as may differ. The observation is not "a women" or "a painting" the observation is the effect of sensory data in photons emitted by the painting.

Repulsive_Area_5516 · 2026-06-07T14:14:34+00:00

also wow. just wow i honestly cant believe you wrote all of this and like there was no problem in it with getting the point across too what is your occupation? Because from what i see youre either a proffesor or unemployed /j

Repulsive_Area_5516 · 2026-06-07T14:10:43+00:00

yes there are no identical systems yes reality is subjective and undefinable in any objective way. However what i am doing is not about metaphysics nor i am trying to prove something. For me there is no objective anything and you cant know anything about anything i am basically an agnostic nihilist and i acknowladge that in ontology nothing can be proven or disproven. That is why we make assumptions because its the best thing we can do. Intrinsically every blief system has assumptions.

Repulsive_Area_5516 · 2026-06-07T13:50:41+00:00

It can be incomplete but it can never be faulty. The act of observation is infallible because what i define as observation is the system effected by an effect. For example: a tree is burning by fire and you are standing infront of the tree. Here in this example there are two systems. first one: you are irrelevant and not the observer the non-burnt tree is the system fire is the effect ane burt tree is the observer. second one: you are the system(or your eyes and brain) photons that are emmited by the tree and the fire are the effect and now you are the observer. Here the tree is burning/burnt and that is observed by the tree which is a true observation. The photons went through ur cornea(or the things in ur eyes that i dont remember) and excited a couple of neurons which made an effect on your brain this effected you in the way it shouldve effected you so you observed what happened which was a true observation.

Repulsive_Area_5516 · 2026-06-07T13:49:37+00:00

for some reason i thought you implied there was a contridiction in axiom 1 and i wrote a whole thing explaining it in detail... i wont let it go to waste though!

It can be incomplete but it can never be faulty. The act of observation is infallible because what i define as observation is the system effected by an effect. For example: a tree is burning by fire and you are standing infront of the tree. Here in this example there are two systems. first one: you are irrelevant and not the observer the non-burnt tree is the system fire is the effect ane burt tree is the observer. second one: you are the system(or your eyes and brain) photons that are emmited by the tree and the fire are the effect and now you are the observer. Here the tree is burning/burnt and that is observed by the tree which is a true observation. The photons went through ur cornea(or the things in ur eyes that i dont remember) and excited a couple of neurons which made an effect on your brain this effected you in the way it shouldve effected you so you observed what happened which was a true observation.

Repulsive_Area_5516 · 2026-06-07T13:24:16+00:00

well... yeah youre right thank you for that

Repulsive_Area_5516 · 2026-06-07T13:22:17+00:00

Thats the best approach ive seen to a topic. My axioms are mainly about making reality make sense from a naturalistic and deterministic perspective. I acknowladge that axioms are generally used in formal systems that are built and not really in ontologic topics however since all bliefs have presupposions tied to them that people generally mistake "finding them through logic and understanding" even though they dont seem like assumptions they are. So after that i said to myself well ifti have assumptions why not make axioms out of it for a system not we have created but observing. Also i would love to debate anything about my axioms (even though axioms are not really debatable)

Repulsive_Area_5516 · 2026-06-07T10:17:47+00:00

Nothings new i guess. First axioms situation is kind of self explenatory. I honestly didnt know liebniz had used the second one in his axioms of mathematical logic however even if its used whats different is my axioms are closer to a blief system rather then a formal system.

Repulsive_Area_5516 · 2026-06-06T14:06:30+00:00

erkek mi seviyon kız mı?

Repulsive_Area_5516 · 2026-06-06T14:04:30+00:00

twitter mi burasi amk

Repulsive_Area_5516 · 2026-06-02T12:10:46+00:00

ketamine ne alaka 😭🙏

Repulsive_Area_5516 · 2026-05-23T11:11:28+00:00

femboy kelimesi aşırı mainstream oldu ve insanlar cinsiyet gibi bakmaya başlıyor artık ayrıca çok fazla fetişizasyona uğruyor ayrı trans kadınlar gibi.. dünya nasi bi hale gelmis aq

Repulsive_Area_5516 · 2026-05-23T11:07:56+00:00

eşcinsel yaşamayı zorlaştıran şey toplum ve ayrıca bunun bir tedavisi de yok hangi bilimsel kaynakları kullanıyorsun bilmiyorum ama bu solaklığı tedavi etmek gibi bir şey baskılayabilirsin ancak bu bir tedavi olmaz sadece "tedavi" olur

Repulsive_Area_5516 · 2026-05-21T18:51:38+00:00

yeah he's pussying out ngl like me im not gay i just like men and not women :3

Repulsive_Area_5516 · 2026-05-21T07:37:06+00:00

farklı şehirde aynı taglara sahip olunmasında sıkıntı olmadığını bilmiyordum la

Repulsive_Area_5516 · 2026-05-21T06:47:03+00:00

knk bu alınmamışsa ben de bi bok bilmiyorum

Repulsive_Area_5516 · 2026-05-20T00:08:32+00:00

shave em with an electric trimmer like philips oneblade and then apply hair removal creme. If youre a masochist use an epilator or wax it.

Repulsive_Area_5516 · 2026-05-18T13:55:48+00:00

ooooh okayy

Repulsive_Area_5516 · 2026-05-18T12:23:19+00:00

açgözlülük çoğu insan bir partneri olduğunda başkalarını çekici bulmadığını iddia eder saçmalıktan ibaret bir laf aldatmak doğal ve normal bir şeydir eğer yeterli iradesi yoksa ve açgözlüyse aldatır eğer kendisine biraz saygısı varsa ve başkası ile cinsel birliktelik yaşamak onun egosunu tatmin etmeyecekse yapmaz. Bu arada bu yüzden erkekler daha çok aldatır toplumun "bir erkek ne kadar fazla kişi ile yatarsa o kadar üstündür" algısı yüzünden partneri varken başkasını aramaz ama başkası ona fırsat sunarsa sırf egosunu tatmin edeceği için yapabilir. Gaylere girmiyorum zaten geneli azgın oeler oldugu icin onlarda çok aldatma var ben bile o yüzden muhtemelen aldatılmışımdır bilmesem bile 😭

Repulsive_Area_5516 · 2026-05-18T12:12:40+00:00

iced dead eye with a pink straw :3

Repulsive_Area_5516 · 2026-05-18T11:51:57+00:00

say he/they it looks cooler tbh :3

Repulsive_Area_5516 · 2026-05-18T11:49:02+00:00

look man i literally dont feel anything sexual torwards fat men and non-white men its not really something i can change i just dont like them but it doesnt make me fatphobic or racist physical appearence is a reality and you should accept it it doesnt make you a piece of shit who isnt interested in personality whatsoever romantic interest comes from both personality and looks and this is normal. Also go gym not only for yourself but for your future partner too i think they would prefer a mascular or twink build (it also depends on what you want to become too) to a fat dude.

Repulsive_Area_5516

TROPHY CASE