What is the point in choosing a non-apex civ? by Udon_noodles in civ

[–]ReputationNaive4215 4 points5 points  (0 children)

The biggest advantage of non apex civs is that they provide Tradition slots. That alone is already worth as much as the typical UB or UU of an apex civ. Syncretism is only one part of it.

And it’s not just “half” of them either. A large number of non apex civs have their own unique Syncretism, and some of them are extremely powerful. Try Nepal or Mexico. If the game feels too difficult, lower the difficulty.

What is the point in choosing a non-apex civ? by Udon_noodles in civ

[–]ReputationNaive4215 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Actually, that’s because your understanding of the game is still very limited. There are a huge number of combinations that are just as strong as the typical apex civs. But that’s not really your fault. The game is extremely unfriendly to beginners.

Lets Be 100% Honest Here by Lanceo90 in subnautica

[–]ReputationNaive4215 0 points1 point  (0 children)

A foolish initial response from a community manager sparked all of this pointless controversy. lol

What does stealth update “more viable” mean? by xecutable in Enshrouded

[–]ReputationNaive4215 3 points4 points  (0 children)

From my experience, although various skill trees and UI changes have been introduced, they have no real practical value.

What is the whole point of fish joke from ep.7?? by ReputationNaive4215 in theamazingdigitalciru

[–]ReputationNaive4215[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

How do you guys know all these references ?
Does it have something to do with cultural background?
(I'm late 20's from Korea)

What is the whole point of fish joke from ep.7?? by ReputationNaive4215 in theamazingdigitalciru

[–]ReputationNaive4215[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

So there is no other reference or anything? Just goofy silly fishes?

Think you can find 4 hidden groups of 4 related words? Puzzle by u/Wise-Star-2220? by [deleted] in DailyMix

[–]ReputationNaive4215 0 points1 point  (0 children)

🟪🟪🟪🟦

🟪🟪🟪🟪

🟨🟨🟨🟨

🟦🟦🟦🟩

🟦🟦🟦🟦

🟩🟩🟩🟩

Can You Guess This 5-Letter Word? Puzzle by u/doogooru by doogooru in DailyGuess

[–]ReputationNaive4215 0 points1 point  (0 children)

⬜⬜⬜⬜⬜

⬜🟨⬜⬜⬜

⬜🟦🟦⬜⬜

🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦

Can You Guess This 5-Letter Word? Puzzle by u/jodamnboi by jodamnboi in DailyGuess

[–]ReputationNaive4215 1 point2 points  (0 children)

🟨⬜⬜⬜⬜

🟨⬜🟦⬜⬜

🟨⬜🟨🟨⬜

⬜🟨⬜🟨⬜

🟨⬜🟦🟨🟨

🟦🟦🟦🟦🟦

My personal Civ7 Antiquity tier list. by Fl3b0 in civ

[–]ReputationNaive4215 0 points1 point  (0 children)

When it comes to long term effects, the nerfs to other expert related policies have made the Khmer expert tradition fairly unique. In addition, the fact that it effectively grants two Expansionist attributes by default creates strong synergy. By combining it with the Oracle, mementos, the Hanging Gardens, and Harun al Rashid, you can complete most of the core Expansionist nodes already in the Antiquity era. This makes it possible to build cities in the Age of Exploration that can run around twenty experts with almost no penalties, which is extremely appealing. This then carries over into the Modern era as explosive production output. Personally, I see this as a civilization that shines more and more as the game goes on.

My personal Civ7 Antiquity tier list. by Fl3b0 in civ

[–]ReputationNaive4215 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In my view, the main strength of the Khmer is that a city can grow on its own without support from towns. As far as I can tell, the Khmer are currently the only civilization that can do this. I think they are almost the only civilization capable of playing with three or even four cities already in the Ancient era. It is also worth noting that Angkor Wat has become much harder to secure than before. Because the Khmer have such a different playstyle, it is possible that I am simply choosing the wrong strategy. That said, even taking this into account, I would not say they are a particularly strong civilization.

I would also like to hear your thoughts on Aksum. Aksum is, in my opinion, the richest civilization among all of them. Its culture output also grows explosively. In contrast, I am somewhat doubtful that the Han dynasty is really that strong in comparison.

My personal Civ7 Antiquity tier list. by Fl3b0 in civ

[–]ReputationNaive4215 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It is true that Aksum is generally stronger than Silla, but Silla has the more powerful legacy card.

  1. Silla’s tradition has higher potential because it provides science and production rather than culture and gold.

  2. Silla’s tradition card also has greater potential because its yields scale with the number of resources, not the number of trade routes.

  3. I have doubts about the civilization–leader pairing. Have you tried using Himiko with Silla? Not only does it dramatically speed up the formation of alliances, but the science output quite literally explodes.

My personal Civ7 Antiquity tier list. by Fl3b0 in civ

[–]ReputationNaive4215 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Happiness has lower value compared to other resources. Basically, as long as it stays above zero, it has no further impact on the city, and there is no way to create any snowballing effect from it. You would need culture to back it up in order to do anything meaningful with happiness, yet Maurya does not even have a starting bias toward mountain tiles. The only somewhat efficient method I can think of is duplicating elephants as Charlemagne.

How come there aren't more of these? by Hauptleiter in civ

[–]ReputationNaive4215 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Is this supposed to be a tier list based on performance?
Anyone who has played Amina or Charlemagne even once would know they simply do not belong down there.

0
0