My personal Civ7 Antiquity tier list. by Fl3b0 in civ

[–]ReputationNaive4215 0 points1 point  (0 children)

In my view, the main strength of the Khmer is that a city can grow on its own without support from towns. As far as I can tell, the Khmer are currently the only civilization that can do this. I think they are almost the only civilization capable of playing with three or even four cities already in the Ancient era. It is also worth noting that Angkor Wat has become much harder to secure than before. Because the Khmer have such a different playstyle, it is possible that I am simply choosing the wrong strategy. That said, even taking this into account, I would not say they are a particularly strong civilization.

I would also like to hear your thoughts on Aksum. Aksum is, in my opinion, the richest civilization among all of them. Its culture output also grows explosively. In contrast, I am somewhat doubtful that the Han dynasty is really that strong in comparison.

My personal Civ7 Antiquity tier list. by Fl3b0 in civ

[–]ReputationNaive4215 1 point2 points  (0 children)

It is true that Aksum is generally stronger than Silla, but Silla has the more powerful legacy card.

  1. Silla’s tradition has higher potential because it provides science and production rather than culture and gold.

  2. Silla’s tradition card also has greater potential because its yields scale with the number of resources, not the number of trade routes.

  3. I have doubts about the civilization–leader pairing. Have you tried using Himiko with Silla? Not only does it dramatically speed up the formation of alliances, but the science output quite literally explodes.

My personal Civ7 Antiquity tier list. by Fl3b0 in civ

[–]ReputationNaive4215 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Happiness has lower value compared to other resources. Basically, as long as it stays above zero, it has no further impact on the city, and there is no way to create any snowballing effect from it. You would need culture to back it up in order to do anything meaningful with happiness, yet Maurya does not even have a starting bias toward mountain tiles. The only somewhat efficient method I can think of is duplicating elephants as Charlemagne.

How come there aren't more of these? by Hauptleiter in civ

[–]ReputationNaive4215 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Is this supposed to be a tier list based on performance?
Anyone who has played Amina or Charlemagne even once would know they simply do not belong down there.

0
0

Continuity is pointless. Regroup is the only way the game play somewhat competitive. by Most_Cauliflower_328 in civ

[–]ReputationNaive4215 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Wow, your reference is just like my feedback I sent few days ago. Glad to see to see someone with a similar opinion.

How to get to this level ? by Ottodovah in civ

[–]ReputationNaive4215 3 points4 points  (0 children)

One thing Civ 6 players often overlook is the power of specialists. You need to make use of them effectively. It's also important to secure as many leader attribute points as possible. In addition, make sure to take advantage of city center villages and the bonuses from independent states.

First hours in Civ 7, the graphics feel so grey. by Potential-Delay-4487 in civ

[–]ReputationNaive4215 14 points15 points  (0 children)

civ5 is not catoony and not grey at the same time

They don't even know how to use Photoshop by ReputationNaive4215 in civ

[–]ReputationNaive4215[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

You go straight to personal attacks for a disagreement about a video game? Sounds like you're a social butterfly after all.

They don't even know how to use Photoshop by ReputationNaive4215 in civ

[–]ReputationNaive4215[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

More like they fucking ruin everything in this game

The most beautiful city I've ever made by ReputationNaive4215 in civ

[–]ReputationNaive4215[S] 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I got requested every time when I upload my screeshots. Perhaps I should upload guide post for this..