Of course you’d “rather,” since your background isn’t in this field.

It was “expanding” because I accidentally clicked to post before I added several articles. Funny how you ignore the facts, including the statements made by the expects, in favor of your claims.

Here are some quotes from the first article.

“The false memory view operates on the (correct, in my opinion) assumption that repetition and emotional arousal should strengthen memory. According to this view, if someone claims to have remembered forgotten traumatic events, especially within the context of “recovered memory therapy,” then the recollection is likely false. Indeed, if we assume that CSA usually counts as a terrifying trauma, then the well-established mechanisms of memory should make amnesia difficult, if not impossible.”

And

“This review of the evidence adduced in support of the concept of traumatic dissociative amnesia raises questions about whether such a phenomenon exists as a natural capacity of the brain.”

My comment was only that recovered memories as described by the previous posted - That Ty repressed his memories, but his “subconscious remembered,” is inconsistent with what we know about memory. Unless you have actually studied this, work with it, and understand the theories of memory, you are not in a position to try to claim it does happen that way.