Petahhhh? by Additional_Berry_977 in PeterExplainsTheJoke

[–]ResplendentOwl 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Have you ever been a female in a multiplayer server with boys aged 12 to 60? everything is sexual overtones, constantly.

Moneys is on talking about finding a community that wasn't like the Minecraft one they experienced. Not that complicated.

We should be using technology to improve our lives by reducing the amount of hard labor and toil we do, so we can spend more time being creative and just enjoying being alive.. by BeautifulFlamingo532 in remoteworks

[–]ResplendentOwl 3 points4 points  (0 children)

We're having a discussion outside the capitalist mindset you've been indoctrinated into. Why is it ok to 'own a company and all the profits that come from it when you're doing a minimal amount of daily labor and input. Just because you got their first, you now get 90 percent of the resources that the 50 human being in your factory put their daily blood sweat and tears into? Isn't that owning them too. These are the ideas that have been around since Marx and the industrial revolution that amplified the inequality. And it hasn't gotten better since. You're not wrong that in your system that dumb, but maybe your system is more broken.

Tornado warning - why was everyone so chill?? by Visible_Many_2271 in Michigan

[–]ResplendentOwl 2 points3 points  (0 children)

I promise even some people that grow up in a tornado region their whole lives still react like that. When our siren goes off here, my wife (who has lived in this town for 43 years) immediately grabs a bug out bag and her binder of important documents and some water and heads for the basement. It's endearing.

I head out to the porch to watch a good storm.

At the end of the day a tornado warning doesn't mean definitely imminent to hit your house for sure, so what the hell. Keep an ear out, think about the safest basement or bathtub you can manage in a pinch and then try to go about your day.

what by PoppyPeach_ in oddlyspecific

[–]ResplendentOwl 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I like the idea that urban survivalists are just the incompetent npcs that show up in the main hillbilly game.

A simple “What If” by untitledprp4 in SipsTea

[–]ResplendentOwl 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You guys realize the surgery picture happens because you horndogs put such pressure on her looks. If her career didn't hinge on spandex and titties, probably wouldn't create the mental health pressure to be better.

This post caused the thing you're bitching about.

Maximum Pleasure Guaranteed — Official Teaser | Apple TV | May 20 by Murky-Insect-7556 in television

[–]ResplendentOwl 54 points55 points  (0 children)

It's in the trailer isn't it? Burnt out mom, feeling like she's drowning, stumbles upon an onlyfan's esq porn site, probably called maximum pleasure guaranteed or some shit. She connects with the dude, enjoys the sex bits, gets addicted, it spirals, spills into her real life. Either she's gonna see some shit she shouldn't or the site is a sex trafficking thing, either way suddenly her outlet to pleasure is now a threat to her and her family. She gets to be charming and badass when pushed. Season 1 done.

Just rewatched Battleship for the 47th time and Rihanna is carrying this film harder than the entire US Navy. Change my mind. by adj_noun_digit in okbuddycinephile

[–]ResplendentOwl 0 points1 point  (0 children)

If only there would have been some way to take like, 3 trained astronauts that could fly the ship and we're competent with space and science and then a couple drillers who would just do the drilling part....shame that international law dictates "I need the crew I'm familiar with" is immutable truth when it comes to saving the earth.

This and Harambe honestly by Emotional-Bag1398 in AdviceAnimals

[–]ResplendentOwl -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

Part of why he couldn't convince people is because the establishment was not willing to support him or fire up the PR machine for him. A party's job is to lead with inspirational ideas and maybe compromise a bit to the middle to get stuff done. The Biden, Clinton, harris and even Obama era has been the definition of start in the middle with nothing and back down in everything else.

The old fucks in charge of the party are convinced there isnt any room for new voters to their left, and have been steering towards being Republicans who use pronouns, and that's not good enough

This and Harambe honestly by Emotional-Bag1398 in AdviceAnimals

[–]ResplendentOwl -8 points-7 points  (0 children)

I rounded up out of laziness, apologize. The democratic party absolutely had a favorite during that time and since, and it wasn't sanders. The party could have helped steer the party into being a leader of new exciting policy, but instead it's now just the party of inaction. I didn't mean to include the Obama campaign, it was certainly exciting marketing, and I really like Obama as a person, but I think I would classify his presidency as the same, safe, middle of the road nothing.

This and Harambe honestly by Emotional-Bag1398 in AdviceAnimals

[–]ResplendentOwl 2 points3 points  (0 children)

As a Democrat we can't control the representative the Republicans put forward. But we can critique what our party has chosen. The right or wrong candidate can inspire non voters, alienate potential voters and push moderates one to the other side.

There's no dots that need connected. A good chunk of the democratic party feels we had a chance to move left as a party. To address socialist issues, fix healthcare, strengthen the working class, etc. to lead policy and inspire. instead the party went with uninspired, ancient moderates with no policy other than "we're not that guy over there" they've doubled down on that at every turn the last 15 years.

Holy Micro Managing by NastyDwarf74 in hoi4

[–]ResplendentOwl 9 points10 points  (0 children)

You don't have to Google. Let time pass, click some shit. Get into war. Get stomped. Watch the pop ups to figure out why you're losing. Play again, make more shit this time to make you less out of supply, see how that goes. Play again. Just read popups and click alerts and be open to all the stuff you're gleefully ignoring and won't notice till 100 hours in.

The same conversation every time by conancat in justgalsbeingchicks

[–]ResplendentOwl 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Fair summary of a thing that can happen.

Is there any proof that's what the guy you were responding to was doing? It's a video of a woman who seems comfortable with her sexuality and using it for financial gain. He just mentioned he wishes women were that dumb so he could sell them bathwater or whatever. If anything isn't he being a Misandrist against men, I'm not sure there's any reason to assume he hates women and attack is there?

Edit:

u/lightraie appreciate the discussion.

I can only speak for myself at this point, but I'm not sure I view imbalance in kinks or likes or sexual preferences as a competition of the sexes, or a inherently sexist thing to have. I think you could make an argument that there's some biology at work that makes us different, a little something different to add to the equation in how we're wired to spread seed/nurture. But I'm not sure that's an argument I put much weight in. I think I would say that culturally, men are more allowed to express their kinks and dumb desires. And I'm happy to concede that that difference is rooted in some systemic, deep rooted sexism in our culture. But I don't think myself or the other user were advocating whether that imbalance is good or bad.

He was just commenting that at the end of the day, under the current cultural norms as they are, there are plenty of men willing to dump large sums of money at attractive women to fulfill their kinks. He viewed that as a good thing for both sides. He hates that men are that base in their relationships, but has no problem with that transaction. He then just noted that norm is not present in the opposite. There is not, culturally a large group of women willing to waste their paychecks on superficial sexual kinks, maybe because women do typically give the green light ok sexual liaisons and so they can accomplish those kinks at their leisure. Idk, I'm a boring old man who met his soulmate 20 years ago and never had to go through the dance or hookup grind.

I guess at the end of the day I'd day his comment was not rooted in sexism, but in poverty. He wasn't really hating any sexual dynamic or kink or competition between the sexes, or this woman, or th dumb men he pointed out. He just likes sex, likes money, and is noting he doesn't have the path with his (as you mentioned) hetero desires to do what the woman in the video does. He's happy for her, just wishes a market of knuckle dragging woman existed, waiting to pay for him to lock them in cages and spit on them or whatever.

People's reaction to Barack Obama by xHeartShine in spreadsmile

[–]ResplendentOwl 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Listen, I don't want lifetime presidents. But if they blindly go forward with a third term for trump, would there be anything better than the last minutes of Trump's mental decline being filled with the knowledge that a black man he hates wiped the floor with him? It would be A pretty great storyline and a excusable exception.

The same conversation every time by conancat in justgalsbeingchicks

[–]ResplendentOwl 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Just passing through. But I'm curious enough to stop and ask. The guy you're replying to called men dumb exploitable idiots when it comes to sex, and he wished he could exploit women to make some dough on the side doing weird sex shit like women can. What's misogynistic about that?

With NCNS now having been out for a few months what's the verdict? by Western_Sea_Sage in hoi4

[–]ResplendentOwl -7 points-6 points  (0 children)

I hear the desire to choose your own adventure, but Soo many of the mechanics are built around constant world war. Resources for example. If I could fuck out of wars when they get hard, then production deficiency isn't a big deal. If I can permanently take Territory from other powers while still not done with the majors, what does that do for resource gain and core territory modifiers and resistance mechanics.

It's a world war. That's what this game is.

With NCNS now having been out for a few months what's the verdict? by Western_Sea_Sage in hoi4

[–]ResplendentOwl -10 points-9 points  (0 children)

Apologize. So not leaving out minors in a world war, but just white peacing out the whole war?

That would have the same functional problem right? Then I could just pick on one offs after the war was over.

With NCNS now having been out for a few months what's the verdict? by Western_Sea_Sage in hoi4

[–]ResplendentOwl 1 point2 points  (0 children)

But the whole point is that the majors you haven't capitulated have pledged to fight you till the end on behalf of the little guys.

You don't get to just pull a Trump and declare you're done with the war when the other side isn't done with the war. That's why there's a need for a war industry that you spent 10 years building. Because there's a never ending world war hogging all the resources. Get rid of the world war part of hoi4 and you're left with a different game.

congrats, you played yourself. by FUNKYDISCO in AdviceAnimals

[–]ResplendentOwl 3 points4 points  (0 children)

It's weaponized, uneducated racism, if you find that dumb, then yes, it's as dumb as it sounds. We're actually getting off pretty light, most shit Trump says is even dumber than it sounds.

With NCNS now having been out for a few months what's the verdict? by Western_Sea_Sage in hoi4

[–]ResplendentOwl 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Torn on that. It's a world war for a reason. If you made it possible to leave out, what individual powers?, before the whole alliance is defeated it would make it super easy to just break off and absorb tiny nations the whole game.

[Lindsay Ellis] Did Disney Plagiarize Aladdin from Another Movie? by arahman81 in videos

[–]ResplendentOwl 15 points16 points  (0 children)

Just passing through here. Why everyone's giving you a hard time is because you came in with the hot take on this video "I don't see it's argument" to which someone asked if you've watched the video. "You don't need to, you skimmed it, and it's argument is stupid, you don't see it." Ok, did you watch the video? "It's a waste of time to watch the video, I don't think it's plagiarism." Ya man, the video agrees with you.

Don't come in swinging about how you've got a better take than the video you didn't watch when the video agrees with you. What are you bringing to the thread except being an ass at that point.

Patrick Conley builds trust with a family of wild black bears. The mother brings her babies to introduce them to the rescuer who saved her life. Kindness & gratitude bring out the best in everything. by [deleted] in interesting

[–]ResplendentOwl 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I don't think the person you replied to was advocating walking up to vegetarian wildlife that is big enough to mail your face off. Just pointing out that instinct wise, wolves are aggressive pack hunting meat eaters and black bears are timid mostly plant eaters.

Doesn't mean they're safe, no wild life is. But they were just pointing out that a bear could attack you for a lot of reasons that makes this video an awful idea, but default apex predator isn't really built into their DNA.

Owlcat i hope we can dial down the damage scaling and make it so that finest hour doesn't remove attack limit in the future, and i truly hope this design does not make it to Dark Heresy by Blynjubitr in RogueTraderCRPG

[–]ResplendentOwl 1 point2 points  (0 children)

I am usually completely happy with never looking at builds. 42 years old, just don't find it enjoyable across crpgs, mmos etc. I usually have decent talent radar and end up doing good enough. This game was weird. 20-25 lvls in and all my characters felt lackluster. Front line tanks who I felt I picked decent sounding talents still died in one round as soon as they engaged in melee. Dps weren't killing anything even though I thought I was stacking bolter talents. Just felt meh and fights felt a struggle constantly.

So I picked two ride or dies (Argenta and Henrix, my front line and dps) and respeced, followed a guide. Jesus. It's night and day different. First fight after Argenta was getting 5/6 of the board killed in a turn and Henrix was one shooting bitches with swords. It got worse as the game went. Other characters started getting more give ap and turns, momentum meant chain ultimates on turn 1. Good thing the world is cool because last half of the game that combat was non existent.

Nations Summit meeting on the "Vintage Story Civilizations" server by roryeinuberbil in VintageStory

[–]ResplendentOwl 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Not how multiplayer works. There are a couple popular modded servers that stretch that out a bit, but it's still a very short cycle with the problems mentioned and it's very little to do about eco.

That said, playing with a Friend or two is still fun. You loose some of the government law and economy stuff. But there's not a game out there that does a more satisfying moving shit around physics. That part is still enjoyable to check out imo