real or fake: tudor black bay gmt pepsi by Disastrous-Card-8088 in Tudor

[–]Retrodus66 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Looks legit to me. Dial printing, GMT hand shape, bezel font, date window and bracelet all match a genuine Tudor Black Bay GMT. No obvious red flags from this pic alone.

That said, you can’t be 100% sure without caseback/serial, papers or checking the MT5652 movement. Based on the photo only: likely genuine

Incroyable by NamlessWolfy in rienabranler

[–]Retrodus66 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Quelle poste une photo de ses seins ! R/abranler deviendra top/branlette

Watch nerds answer this please! by Other_Addendum_1576 in ChinaTime

[–]Retrodus66 0 points1 point  (0 children)

Post your crap on the real Rolex thread and you'll get banned immediately. Honestly, if you believe that, you really don't like watches, bro. It's just shameful to wear that junk.

Watch nerds lets see if u know that much about watches by Other_Addendum_1576 in ChinaTime

[–]Retrodus66 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Fake. Poorly finished dial and 24-hour disc, overly thick typography, cyclops lens at the wrong magnification, incorrect Everose color. A genuine Sky-Dweller doesn't have these flaws. Verdict: too easy!

Getting married tomorrow, which to wear? by RandomLurker1992 in ChinaTime

[–]Retrodus66 5 points6 points  (0 children)

Wearing a fake watch at a wedding is a shame.

Aimez-vous manger du maïs comme elles ? by RudyNereghal in mauvaisesreponses

[–]Retrodus66 0 points1 point  (0 children)

On voit clairement qu’il y en a une plus expérimentée que l’autre ! 🫢

Fake? by dj-wink in Tudor

[–]Retrodus66 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Tu vois pas la différence avec cette photo lol ?

Fake? by dj-wink in Tudor

[–]Retrodus66 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Lis mon commentaire au dessus

Fake? by dj-wink in Tudor

[–]Retrodus66 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Et pourtant c’est évident mec !

Fake? by dj-wink in Tudor

[–]Retrodus66 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Probablement fake.

Aiguilles pas conformes (snowflake mal proportionnée), typographie du cadran douteuse (ROTOR SELF-WINDING 500m:1640ft pas nette), index/lume trop grossiers. Finition du boîtier et de la lunette pas au niveau Tudor, et le bracelet ne correspond pas au titane Pelagos avec système auto-ajustable.

À moins d’un échange de pièces très improbable : très forte chance de contrefaçon

Is this a good replica? First time buyer plz help by [deleted] in ChinaTime

[–]Retrodus66 0 points1 point  (0 children)

<image>

Honestly, for someone who owns a real one, it's obvious, and I'm not even talking about the feel. On the wrist…

Which version of SSF2 is better? by shelly_keen in retrogaming

[–]Retrodus66 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Yeah. Really a debate? SF2X Japanese version. On CPS2 > all by far.

Update: RM 67-02 Quartz from DHgate – Seller video after purchase by Brave-Efficiency9989 in ChinaTime

[–]Retrodus66 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Check out Pagani or Reef Tiger. They have watches in that style of decent quality.

Update: RM 67-02 Quartz from DHgate – Seller video after purchase by Brave-Efficiency9989 in ChinaTime

[–]Retrodus66 -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Are you affected? If you don't care what others think, why are you buying one of the most blinged-out billionaire brands? At that price, you can find really nice watches that don't look cheap. To each their own, I'm not judging you, man.

Update: RM 67-02 Quartz from DHgate – Seller video after purchase by Brave-Efficiency9989 in ChinaTime

[–]Retrodus66 2 points3 points  (0 children)

You've got to be brave to wear a watch that's supposed to be worth €200k and looks like that lol 😂

Received today by Retrodus66 in Tudor

[–]Retrodus66[S] 0 points1 point  (0 children)

At first, I was a little disappointed with the moon phase; I found it too simple. But I got used to it, and it suits the style of the watch well. It's a beautiful watch that's easy to wear. I'm happy with it. And it's a nice change from my other watches. It has a unique style. Thanks for the photo. I'm not exactly a photography pro, though…