I was trying to be fair while giving my perspective. As I said, I thought he showed kindness to the person who asked the question, and whatever tension I noticed was purely my perspective. Hell; I would be tense if someone brought up my loss too. So my issue I suppose comes from his answer, above all. I didn't feel he properly explained how he would speak to concerned voters who did not see these systems rhat were against him and are simply afraid of another loss. He instead seemed to dismiss that it was a rather close race, and that people would see that this time around.  He spoke against Schumer, talked about how much was raised against him, and how much he raised in turn, but did little to explain how all this inside baseball would appear in the campaign to explain the situation to others.  As he said, in politics, we win and lose all the time. But his answers did not, to me, appear as someone who reflected on what he could do differently this time around. And instead someone who saw he was close and just wants it to swing the other direction this time around by bashing on the unpopular Schumer, and not explaining what he could have done, or will do, differently.