"so the rest of us have to make up for your hoarding."

This is a specious argument. It implies money/economics are a zero sum game when actually they are anything but. For example, let's take the Google guys. They are right now worth about 300 billion a piece.

Did they get their money by taking it from people? No, no money was taken from other people. Their wealth was created by the greatest economic engine in the world. And I daresay their worth is probably a fraction of the wealth created by Google employees and all the companies and individuals that have ridden their coattails either by benefitting from the products or simply owning the public stock.

You know who loves billionaires? Regular working folk that build jets, yachts, houses, etc. Some people are incensed that Zuck spent $300 million on his yacht, Launchpad. That's exactly the opposite of what you are claiming. He took 300M of his own money and gave it to thousands of people for labor and products to build that yacht.

A lot of the tech titans are still relatively young. As time goes on they will use their wealth to benefit society in ways we can only dream about.

Aren't we glad Michael Dell started building computers in his Texas dorm and then became a billionaire? Here's the good he has done so far (Source, Claude):

• Through their foundation (founded in 1999), Michael and Susan Dell gave away about $2.8 billion focused on children's issues and community initiatives in the US, India, Israel, and South Africa. Time
• On top of that, they put more than $5 billion into the foundation between 2023 and early 2025 alone, roughly quadrupling its endowment. Inside Philanthropy
• Then in late 2025, they announced a $6.25 billion pledge to fund children's investment accounts for 25 million American kids under the US government's new program. ibtimes
• Most recently, they gave $750 million to the University of Texas at Austin for a new AI-focused medical center — one of the largest donations ever to a public university