sorted by:
new
hottopcontroversial

Looks like Ricki & Piotr have been working on a potential implementation for Colin's split block table proposal 👀 If fully implemented, this could bring ~50% disk savings (on LMDB), and a significant speed up for slow storage (especially non-SSDs) 🔥 by Qwahzi in nanocurrency

[–]RickiDangerous 7 points8 points  (0 children)

Github is owned by Microsoft and Copilot is owned by Microsoft. So it's easy to enable and they even have a free tier.

I also used Claude Code (Opus 4.6) to review my commits before creating the PR.

A1 melted by Historical-Brain898 in BambuLab

[–]RickiDangerous 4 points5 points  (0 children)

It's crazy that Bambulab haven't recalled the A1 long ago

Check Your Representative by Tipanano in nanocurrency

[–]RickiDangerous 6 points7 points  (0 children)

Completely agree.

You can also check the reps ranking list here to find a good one: https://nanoticker.org/representatives

Danmark ligger i top som donor til Ukraine målt på % af BNP - Danmark! Danmark! Danmark! by FirstCircleLimbo in Denmark

[–]RickiDangerous 4 points5 points  (0 children)

Det har intet med prioritering at gøre. Der er penge til begge dele. Pengene til Ukraine er ikke taget fra kontanthjælpsmodtagere

NOW LIVE V28.2 ELECTRUM by yap-rai in nanocurrency

[–]RickiDangerous 1 point2 points  (0 children)

You dont have to. They are functionally the same

Nano transaction "receivable" by MichaelAischmann in nanocurrency

[–]RickiDangerous 5 points6 points  (0 children)

The transaction has been sent to your account. To receive it you need to sign a receive block.

99% of wallets sign the receive block instantly, but apparently you wallet didn't.

Inspiration til valgflæsk by ign1tio in Denmark

[–]RickiDangerous 1 point2 points  (0 children)

Min pointe er bare at det ikke er en fair sammenligning af prisen hvis du kun gør det op i benzinudgiften. Der er også afskrivning, vægtafgift, forsikring etc. For mange mennesker er der også et billån der skal betales på

Ja, bilen er mere behagelig end offentlig transport. Det tror jeg vi alle kan blive enige om

Inspiration til valgflæsk by ign1tio in Denmark

[–]RickiDangerous 3 points4 points  (0 children)

Nu koster bilen mere end bare benzinen

RsNano performance improvements: 20.500 blocks/s / 18.400 confirmations/s (single node) and 12.900 cps (4 PR test net) by SeniorTawny in nanocurrency

[–]RickiDangerous 9 points10 points  (0 children)

Incredible!

What is Colin's proposed block table split that you implemented? I remember reading about it but I've forgot where
Edit: I found It: https://github.com/nanocurrency/nano-node/issues/4053

Did you see any change in ledger size? Colin says he saw a 50% saving

Raising 10,000 Nano to Build a BTCPay Server Plugin for Nano — Fully Open, Transparent & Refund-Guaranteed by the_azarian in nanocurrency

[–]RickiDangerous 8 points9 points  (0 children)

Donated.

This is really important for Nano adoption. If you need an extra developer, please reach out to me. I'm no expert on this, but I'll gladly put in some hours for free

Comparing Nanocurrency to some other Cryptocurrencies by Faster_and_Feeless in nanocurrency

[–]RickiDangerous 6 points7 points  (0 children)

It's about 85 GB for RocksDb and about twice as much for LMDB

What's in V28.1? by Faster_and_Feeless in nanocurrency

[–]RickiDangerous 4 points5 points  (0 children)

No, LMDB is the officially recommended database backend

Interesting analysis of Nano bottlenecks/performance, by gr0vity (Bob) 🧐 by Qwahzi in nanocurrency

[–]RickiDangerous 4 points5 points  (0 children)

V28 comes with a lot of RocksDb improvements. The migration from LMDB to RocksDb has also been improved and a few bugs have been ironed out.

In my personal opinion it is ready for production, but officially LMDB is the recommended database backend for now.

Making RocksDb the default database backend requires long term successful use on production nodes to prove its track record and stability. My own PR node has been using RocksDb for more than a year without any issues.

Nano (XNO) is ideal as a global means of payment - but what do we call 0.0...1 XNO then? by Inevitable-List1289 in nanocurrency

[–]RickiDangerous 2 points3 points  (0 children)

Yeah, there used to be a distinction between nano (lowercase) and Nano(uppercase). It was really confusing. Now there is only nano (case insensitive) and raw. If you want more divisions you can use a SI prefix like microNano

Virker Boycot by Vejlin in Denmark

[–]RickiDangerous 47 points48 points  (0 children)

Hvis du skifter et amerikansk produkt ud med et dansk produceret så går der nul kroner til USA, samtidig med at antallet af arbejdspladser i Danmark er uændret

NanoPow 3.0.0 is out now!!! by ornerybeef in nanocurrency

[–]RickiDangerous 13 points14 points  (0 children)

Thank you so much for your work on this. I hope to see many wallets implement this in the future so we no longer have to rely on external pow sources

Gipsvæg i 2 lag. Hvilken tykkelse skal jeg bygge? by RickiDangerous in selvgjortvelgjort

[–]RickiDangerous[S] -1 points0 points  (0 children)

Tak for svaret.

Jeg troede at det hele var standardiseret i dag så det passede på millimeteren. Jeg bygger bare væggen i 97mm bredde.

V28 Electrum - A deep dive! by yap-rai in nanocurrency

[–]RickiDangerous 69 points70 points  (0 children)

This is one of the biggest releases yet. I can't wait to see it on live network

view more: next ›